Close-up filters - Effect on depth of field

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Close-up filters - Effect on depth of field

Postby leek on Wed Oct 05, 2005 2:35 pm

Does anyone know how to calculate the depth of field for a given lens and a given aperture when +1, +2 or +4 closeup filters are fitted???
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby ozonejunkie on Wed Oct 05, 2005 3:44 pm

I have never experimented much with it, but a while ago I stumbled upon this:

http://ca.geocities.com/lokejul/jlcalc.htm

Hopefully you can make some sense out of it.

Tristan
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D

Postby moggy on Wed Oct 05, 2005 4:23 pm

What an awesome program Tristan, thanks for the link. :wink:


8) Bob.
User avatar
moggy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 852
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:00 pm
Location: Castle Hill, Sydney. - Fixed D70s

Postby leek on Wed Oct 05, 2005 5:21 pm

Thanks Tristan - Just what I needed... It confirmed my suspicion that I was playing with 0.5mm Depth of Field earlier today - no wonder it was so damned difficult to focus :lol:
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby ozonejunkie on Wed Oct 05, 2005 6:16 pm

leek wrote:Thanks Tristan - Just what I needed... It confirmed my suspicion that I was playing with 0.5mm Depth of Field earlier today - no wonder it was so damned difficult to focus :lol:


Yes, that was the reason that I tried to find this exact program. I bought a +3 close up filter about 3 weeks ago, and whilst playing with it, discovered that focus is really, really touchy. Then I realised how small my DOF was. :|

It took a while to get used to, but I love it these days!

Tristan
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D

Postby Onyx on Wed Oct 05, 2005 11:36 pm

f/22 is your friend. ;)

(and so is a tripod if you're at f/22 shooting macros)
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby xorl on Thu Oct 06, 2005 2:53 am

Flash can also make it possible to use tiny apertures for macro work. You may not need the tripod then..
Mark
User avatar
xorl
Member
 
Posts: 391
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 11:07 am
Location: Sydney, NSW

Postby Aussie Dave on Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:22 am

just curious as to people's thoughts on playing with such a very shallow DOF, with the close-up filters ? Shooting with a DOF of 0.5mm, in my mind, would not be conducive to pleasing photos....leaving foreground/background OOF.

All too often we see people posting amazing macro photos and the comments/critiques that seem to be prevalent in all these is, "nice shot, but it would have been better if the [xxx] was in focus, as well".

Unless you are taking photos of salt grains, I don't see how you could ever expect to have a deep enough DOF to obtain fully pleasing macro photos - using these c-up filters.

I have thought about getting some c-up's but I keep coming back to this same question.

Am I missing something ?
Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII
Photography = Compromise
User avatar
Aussie Dave
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1427
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 1:40 pm
Location: West. Suburbs, Melbourne [Nikon D7000]

Postby leek on Thu Oct 06, 2005 8:39 am

Aussie Dave wrote:Unless you are taking photos of salt grains, I don't see how you could ever expect to have a deep enough DOF to obtain fully pleasing macro photos - using these c-up filters.


Thaddeus and I found this image to be quite pleasing... :lol:
Image

The out of focus areas can introduce nice dreamy effects similar not too dissimilar to the bokeh effect that many strive to achieve in their normal photos...

You only get down to .5mm DOF with extremely long lenses and high magnification... Usually you have the luxury of several mms :lol:

I find that the 52mm Closeup filters work really well on the 50mm and 105mm primes... As you may have seen - I just bought a set for the 80-400VR as well - this was more for the pleasure of experimentation...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions