Noise Reduction Software....

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Noise Reduction Software....

Postby TonyH on Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:48 am

Is there any particular Noise Reduction Software which is head and shoulders above the others or perhaps particularly tuned to Nikon?

A trial version might be useful to evaluate prior to buying.

Any settings that you find works particularly well for most scenarios or do you constantly need to adjust the settings?

Any recommendations?

Regards

Tony
All I know, is that I don't know enough.....
TonyH
Senior Member
 
Posts: 856
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2005 7:39 am
Location: Brisbane, QLD Nikon D200 & D70

Postby Michael on Sat Oct 22, 2005 11:56 am

When I used to have the E-300 olympus it having a very noisy kodak sensor I used to use neat image I used a few others before neat image with limited succes but neat image imho is head and shoulders above the rest.

I hope this helps!
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby stubbsy on Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:03 pm

Tony

I don't actually use any denoise software, but the one that seems to get the best rap is Neat Image. Do a search here and you'll find some reports on it. One example is this thread. Noise Ninja is another popular program
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby kipper on Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:18 pm

I swear by Neat Image for Noise Reduction. I've used both packages and I have found that Neat Image worked the best for me.

Also one thing that I did notice when using Noise Ninja and might have just been the version is when selecting areas for noise reduction (eg. subject or background) and then processing that area the area would be reduced in noise but the area not selected would have artifacts introduced. Hence why I started using Neat Image. I'll have to revist both again soon.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby mitedo on Sat Oct 22, 2005 12:38 pm

Ive used a few also, and keep going back to Neat Image its always worked the best for me
Kevin
User avatar
mitedo
Member
 
Posts: 465
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 11:02 pm
Location: Noosaville .

Postby MattC on Sat Oct 22, 2005 1:03 pm

I have had a good run with Noise Ninja for the worst of it, and the noise reduction plugin in CS2 for lesser. Blur tool is sometimes useful for small areas.
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby avkomp on Sat Oct 22, 2005 2:16 pm

I have tried quite a lot of these including noise ninja and neatg image and performed side by side tests
Neat Image stands out head and shoulders above everything I have tried.
Comes with a stand alone program and a photoshop plugin.

I have stopped looking for a better program now because it just works.

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby glamy on Sat Oct 22, 2005 3:36 pm

Hello,
Same here, Neat Image is the prefered one. I also tried a few (Fred Miranda's DRI was one) but always go back to Neat Image.
Cheers,
Gerard
User avatar
glamy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X

Postby Matt. K on Sat Oct 22, 2005 7:46 pm

Noiseware is free and works very well. I use it when I need to.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby mudder on Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:44 pm

G'day Tony,

I've been using Neat Image on high ISO shots, found it very powerful and convenient using it within feather selections with Photoshop, haven't noticed and ill effect other than the expected slight loss of fine detail in the treated areas. Works well within Photoshop.

Haven't worked out how to get the best performance from it yet :oops: Just need to spend more time playing with it I suppose, but it's able to treat the different noise spectrums (like the fine, high frequency noise Vs larger low frequency noise) independantly and can use profiles for specific cameras if you wish (which you can either make yourself with your camera or download from their site). Seems quite spiffy :)
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby redline on Sat Oct 22, 2005 8:53 pm

i used noise ninja, but i used profiles from a d100( are there files profiles for d70 now?) it seems to "blur" out the noise. kinda makes thing loses sharpeness as well. works well for the sony though.
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne


Return to General Discussion