This can't be right?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
This can't be right?I snapped this image on Sunday in Hyde Park with the 80-200mm lens. Look at the guys left foot! It can't be that big, surely. It's not likely that the lens has distorted the image? Perhaps just a weird perspective?
Or just big feet? http://www.pbase.com/matt_k/image/37269309 Regards
Matt. K
yep, that is a very big foot........
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
bush fire brigade ...Back in Kraut Land (that's where I come from) we used to say,
they (big feet) are extremely useful for stomping (stamping ?) out fires.
Hi Matt. Well big feet alright i think someone has been playing with PS. The right foot looks to be on more of an angle and a bit out of proprtion.LOL
but looks different. D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Ian Thorpe?
Someone better call a toe truck. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Ok Matt, I thought it had been played with a bit, yeh well wonder where ge gets his shoes??? LOL
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40 http://www.oz-images.com
Looks like there's a bit of elongation just from the way it's shot, but otherwise, yes, he has big feet.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Wow, you should be able to make millions off of this photo.
You didn't notice these feet when you took the photo? Looks like the other foot (judging by the toe) is just as large. Too bad there isn't a clear shot of his hands. I knew a fellow who was a little below average in size, but had the most enormous hands and feet. It looked like he was wearing baseball gloves or something.
sirhc55
No. This a genuine image. I was simply struck by the perceived size of the feet after I opened the image in PS. The guy didn't look unusual when I took the image...I was thinking how he looked like Max Dupains "the sunbather" and grabbed a couple of quick shots. Regards
Matt. K
"big feet - little" patience for people who constantly talk about how big feet are, I mean seriously, they're just feet... Where's the anecdote for big noses? Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
Previous topic • Next topic
20 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|