Which lense to take?

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Which lense to take?

Postby kipper on Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:16 pm

Just a little delima. I have the Nikon 70-300G and the Sigma 70-300 APO I Super Macro. Which one should I take, can't really see the point of taking both.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby phillipb on Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:20 pm

I would be happy with either one, as a matter of fact if you decide to sell one let me know.
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby Greg B on Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:25 pm

The Sigma will give you the macro option, where the other one won't. Otherwise, no differences in focal lengths etc. I would take the sigma.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby kipper on Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:34 pm

But you love the Sigma Lenses :)

Well I'm taking the following:

50mm 1.4D
18-70mm 3.5/4.5

And I have a set of closeup filters so I can use these lenses for macro.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Greg B on Fri Dec 10, 2004 9:41 pm

Actually kipper, I don't own a sigma. I went for the Tamron.

I just think that deciding between the two 70-300 lenses for taking on a trip, the sigma gives the extra option of the macro.

So aren't you going to take either of them?
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby kipper on Fri Dec 10, 2004 10:51 pm

I'm getting quite anxious because of the weight restrictions. My camera bag is currently 4kg, I have a satchel which is about 1.5-2kg plus I'm carrying a rice cooker.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby MattC on Sat Dec 11, 2004 12:11 am

How about leaving the rice cooker at home??

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby kipper on Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:26 am

:o

While I might enjoy recieving a Sigma or Nikkor lense for christmas, I'm sure my sister won't.
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby fozzie on Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:33 am

kipper,

Get rid of the rich cooker, and some clothes and take all the lenses, old and maybe new!.
Bon Voyage for this afternoon. :D

Cheers,
fozzie

When people ask what equipment I use - I tell them my eyes.
User avatar
fozzie
Key Member
 
Posts: 2806
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2004 9:19 pm
Location: AUADA : Nikon D3/D2x - JPG Shooter

Postby bwhinnen on Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:37 am

They don't weigh that much :P And I'd take which ever lens you feel gives you the best results, if they are similar go for the Sigma. But take at least one, you'll kick yourself later if you don't have it and find that special shot that you just can't get with the shorter focal lengths ...

Cheers
Brett
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby birddog114 on Sat Dec 11, 2004 6:42 am

kipper wrote::o

While I might enjoy recieving a Sigma or Nikkor lense for christmas, I'm sure my sister won't.


kipper,
forget those lenses, the 24-120VR will bring you more happiness and successfully with your entirely trip.
We have couple members got them and enjoyed their trip as Vic and Gary.
And only take one 70-300 with you.
As mentioned earlier, the Computrekker will hurt your back if you try to do the hard packing it, cos you always see it with more room and can't limited yourself. The minitrekker has its own limited.
The weight of the bag won't give or harder at the earlier of the day but it will torture you once you worn out.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby kipper on Sat Dec 11, 2004 7:18 am

:wink:

Think I'm leaning towards the Nikkor glass, mainly because I've seen some awesome shots taken with it. Aperture wise they're identical, not sure about the elements. If I need to do macro, I can always use the lenses I've got with closeup diopters or even splash out on a reversal ring.

As for the VR lense Birdy, as much as I'd love to have the 24-120VR and the 70-200VR to go with me on this trip, I don't think it'll be happening.
Definately can see myself having the 70-200VR though not far into the New Year :)
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Raydar on Sat Dec 11, 2004 7:25 am

I have the Sigma & am happy with the images that come out of it.
The macro is quite sharp about half way between 200 & 300 mm.
Focusing is a little slow compared to the kit lens but not enough to worry me to much.

I think you will be happy with what ever lens you settle on but I think the Sigma with the macro opens up a little more to experiment with.

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

Postby kipper on Sat Dec 11, 2004 7:30 am

You got the APO I or II ?

Seen quite a few shots taken with the APO II but not the I
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Raydar on Sat Dec 11, 2004 7:31 am

kipper wrote:You got the APO I or II ?

Seen quite a few shots taken with the APO II but not the I


I have the II mate.

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

Postby kipper on Sat Dec 11, 2004 8:35 am

Yeah, I've seen quite a few photos with this lense and it looks quite crisp. Haven't really had much of a play with the APO I on the D70, however I've seen some good photos with the D70 with it
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Raydar on Sat Dec 11, 2004 8:41 am

The lens is a little soft at full zoom but not alot to get Concerned about.
This image was taken at full zoom.

http://www.users.bigpond.com/r.s.mullen ... kprm01.jpg

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW


Return to General Discussion