A can of worms?

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

A can of worms?

Postby Geoff on Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:25 pm

Lens envy? What if it's a canon lens? These photos were shot on Manly beach last week end when Craig (JordanP) and I went for a walk, we got some shots of this photog shooting a surfing comp..he got a bit perplexed with us watching (and photographing) him! :)

Image

Image

Image

All 3 images taken with the 70-300G lens :) Comments welcome!
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby JordanP on Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:29 pm

No I don't think he was perplexed. He was just jealous 'cause we were packing Nikon Gear (tehehehe) :lol:
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby MCWB on Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:47 pm

I find the last pic hilarious!! :lol: Any idea what that lens is? Petal666?
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby Onyx on Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:48 pm

 ROFL - that last image is like a classic women's magazine celebrity caught by papparazzi look. ;)

Ooh, he's using manfrotto to support his big glass - w00t, boo Gitzo, go Manfrotto! :D

Looks just as mighty as Birddog's 200-400. I wonder what it is... maybe Petal our token Canon guy would know.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby BBJ on Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:02 am

It's Big and even bigger bucks but looks like an EF 600mm f/4L Ultrasonic to me.
D3,D2x,D70,18-70 kit lens,Sigma 70-200mm F2.8EX HSM,Nikon AF-I 300m F2.8, TC20E 2X
80-400VR,SB800,Vosonic X Drive,VP6210 40
http://www.oz-images.com
User avatar
BBJ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3651
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 8:49 pm
Location: Mt Gambier South Australia-D70-D2X

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:07 am

That looks a lot like one of Canon's Super Telephoto 300's.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby JordanP on Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:14 am

I'm with BBJ I thik it is 600mm. Surf photography is left wanting unless you have between 600 - 800mm
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby Onyx on Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:33 am

Is that a teleconverter he's got on?
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby darb on Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:15 am

so often recently when im watching news or any program really where photographers are present, it all seems to be canon these days .. mostly noticeable by the white L glass of course

am I missing something? I mean i dont really give a flying crap coz i love my gear, and have owned canon and nikon ... but just curious
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby Onyx on Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:46 am

Nikon have white glass (well, light grey), Pentax also have light grey glass.

Common misconception: white = canon. That is not the case.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby dooda on Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:01 am

True, it seems that Canon has done very well as of recent, many pros seem to be with Canon, as they seemed to time the digital thing perfectly. When I was doing the photos for Santa a newspaper/stock photographer came by with a Canon D1. He just couldn't wait to launch into this conversation about switching over from Nikon because blah blah Canon this and that. I couldn't think of a more useless conversation. Nikon and Canon users just can't have normal conversations when their cameras dangle around their necks. Every so often on megapixel.net someone asks if they should get a 300d or a 20d or a D70. I always respond with my feelings for the D70 vis-a-vis my experience with shooting with the 300d. I never go about bashing the 300d etc, as it is a good fit for some people, but the D70 is better for more serious enthusiasts. There then inevitably comes a canon user who just can't promote their product without bashing Nikon for some reason. It just makes me wonder. (I'm not stating this on behalf of all Canon users of course, but it seems to happen so often).

There's no doubt that Canon as well as Nikon has some great stuff...it's just that Nikon is better. :wink:
love's first sighs are wisdom's last

Dave
http://www.flickr.com/photos/elton/
User avatar
dooda
Party Animal
 
Posts: 1591
Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2004 11:47 am
Location: Vancouver, B.C. Canada

Postby birddog114 on Tue Dec 14, 2004 5:49 am

That's the Canon 600mm
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby gstark on Tue Dec 14, 2004 6:46 am

BBJ wrote:It's Big and even bigger bucks but looks like an EF 600mm f/4L Ultrasonic to me.


That's what it looks like to me as well.

Geoff, I'm curious: in the full frame original, can you read the Manfrotto sticker on the tripod legs?

Dooda, your observations are spot on. Both Canon and Nikon make excellent products, although in my experience, Nikon products seem to be more solidly built. But the glassware on both fronts is excellent, as is the technology underlying the cameras, as well as the features of their cameras.

The 300D was a class leader, and Canon need to be commended for bringing it to market and paving the way for the D70.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby JordanP on Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:39 am

Not wanting to speak for Geoff.... but we could read the sticker on the tripod legs when we zoomed in to 100%
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby gstark on Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:51 am

Thanx Craig.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby W00DY on Tue Dec 14, 2004 9:59 am

Ahhhh. my life's goal. To become a surf photographer.

Now where's my spare $20k for a lens and then another $100k to travel the world.
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby MHD on Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:00 am

Nikkor AFS 600mm f/4 ??
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby MHD on Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:03 am

seems like a crappy tripod+head for such a good lens
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby petal666 on Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:06 am

It looks to be a 600f4 IS with a 1.4x teleconverter attached making it a 840f5.6 seeing as he looks to be using film or a full frame digital.

Image
Canon 1D III
User avatar
petal666
Senior Member
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:17 am
Location: Toowng QLD - 1D III

Postby JordanP on Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:07 am

Ahhhh. my life's goal. To become a surf photographer.


Woody,

That is also one of my passions - we should catch up some time! Would you prefer to just shoot the big lens from the shore or does the thought of some great gear in a quality water housing interest you?
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby JordanP on Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:09 am

It looked like a nice film body - no evidence of digital
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby W00DY on Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:19 am

JordanP wrote:
Ahhhh. my life's goal. To become a surf photographer.


Woody,

That is also one of my passions - we should catch up some time! Would you prefer to just shoot the big lens from the shore or does the thought of some great gear in a quality water housing interest you?


I don't think anything would beat being out in the water at Teahupoo Tahiti when it is on.

It would be pretty intense having that much power around you (with the reef only 4 foot under you!!!) and trying to consentrate on taking photos.
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby JordanP on Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:23 am

oh yeah 8) now you're talking. Have you done any water photography before? I used an old Nikon point and shoot that was waterproof for about 2yrs.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby W00DY on Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:25 am

JordanP wrote:oh yeah 8) now you're talking. Have you done any water photography before? I used an old Nikon point and shoot that was waterproof for about 2yrs.


Yeah when I used to Scuba Dive a lot I bought a minolta underwater camera (you can still buy them know). Can't remeber the model number or anything but it was bright yellow :)

Took that oout a few times down the south coast when we surfed Ulladulla and got some ok photos.

The quality was never that great but it was good enough when we were only 18 and just having fun.
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby JordanP on Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:30 am

exactly - very similar experiences. I remember getting a few ok shots out at the bommie at Ulladulla. I was on a surf trip with a friend and we did the east coast from th QLD border to Phillip Island and Bells. Arrr, those were the days.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby gstark on Tue Dec 14, 2004 10:53 am

JordanP wrote:oh yeah 8) now you're talking. Have you done any water photography before? I used an old Nikon point and shoot that was waterproof for about 2yrs.


And then it started leaking ?
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby JordanP on Tue Dec 14, 2004 12:10 pm

no, then it kind of got destroyed.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby PlatinumWeaver on Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:07 pm

Taken at the cricket ( indoors at the Telstra Dome ).

Image
http://www.platinumweaver.net/images/oddoneout.jpg
PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions
<a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
PlatinumWeaver
Member
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Postby petal666 on Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:37 pm

Look at all those light grey Nikon lenses :D
Canon 1D III
User avatar
petal666
Senior Member
 
Posts: 737
Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2004 7:17 am
Location: Toowng QLD - 1D III

Postby bwhinnen on Tue Dec 14, 2004 1:43 pm

They just look so excited don't they (the sports photographers at the Cricket), are you sure they weren't at the cricket supposed to be played up here last week??

On the Canon V Nikon in the press photographers leagues. A friend of mine works for the Courier Mail (News Ltd) here in Brissie (his green WRX in my other photos...) and he says the photographers in Brisbane use the Canon bodies yet those in Sydney working for News Ltd use Nikon... I think it was a case of who got the best deal at the time.

It's something I found very interesting as it'd make going on an interstate assignment a little difficult if all your colleagues are using a different brand :shock:

Cheers
Brett
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby Raydar on Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:58 pm

I think I could find some thing in the crowd worth shooting rather than just sitting there looking like they do!!!! :wink:

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

Postby darb on Tue Dec 14, 2004 7:39 pm

why have so many pro's turned to using canon SLR's? They seem to be EVERYWHERE, or am i just missing the nikkors. (im not talking about us serious amateurs or semi pro's.)
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)


Return to General Discussion