Have you ever made a "bad purchase"

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Are there any purchases(camera related) that you reget now?

yes
17
65%
no
6
23%
neva! no bad buys here
1
4%
ebayed them alreadly
2
8%
 
Total votes : 26

Have you ever made a "bad purchase"

Postby redline on Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:14 pm


so what have you purchased and regetted later having wish you didn't
buy them?

me: tamaron 28-200 xr lenses, it was replaced my carl jenis 28-200 which got stolen by some theives.
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:33 pm

2.5 x Teleconvertor (not the kind most of your are thinking off)
Image
Takes shitty photos like Image

Hmmm, I also got a lot of sub-par stuff bundled with my camera... tripod for example... while it has served me well I would of prefered to go straight to a decent one.. but in hindsight the tripod was better then nothing...
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Onyx on Mon Nov 28, 2005 2:57 pm

Not so much bad purchases as in later regret having bought them, but more why did I buy it as I haven't gotten much if any use out of them - the ML-L3 remote and ND4 2-stop neutral density filter.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Greg B on Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:01 pm

Yes indeedy.....

My Velbon tripod. Useless, but now replaced with the fabulous Benro. The Velbon will be moderately useful, however, as a stand for the SB800

I bought a couple of Lowepro bags, Nova 2, (nowhere near big enough although it was mainly for the G3 plus lens attachments), the Nova 3 (No Greg , No). Now have the Mini Trekker AW, good, but already full :shock:

I'll post again when I think of more
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby losfp on Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:13 pm

Hmmm... don't know if this counts, but "back in the day", I bought my Sony Ericsson T610 partly because it had an onboard camera.

Of course, in hindsight, the tiny plastic lens and 352x288 resolution weren't so great as selling points.....

Most of my camera purchases have been pretty damn good, if I do say so myself.. Mostly because I spend hours researching on dpreview and online messageboards first :) Although I am sure that I will start to get a couple of lemons now that I'm going to get involved in SLRs.
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby Raskill on Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:20 pm

Yeah, but you live and learn.

My Sigma 70-200mm got me a couple of paying jobs, sold for more than I bought it for and allowed me to buy a 70-200 VR.

It's all about what you can afford versus what you want versus what you really need.

Best purchase, Nikkor 50mm 1.8 for $60 U.S.

Worst, either my Lowpro Trekker (No room) or my tripod (which I still have :( )
2x D700, 2x D2h, lenses, speedlights, studio, pelican cases, tripods, monopods, patridges, pear trees etc etc

http://www.awbphotos.com.au
User avatar
Raskill
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2161
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2005 12:26 pm
Location: Rockley, near Bathurst, Home of Aussie Motorsport!

Postby owen on Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:39 pm

Kodak every day picture paper... flimsy thin pieces of garbage.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby MHD on Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:44 pm

My Kit...
Ie stuff bundled with camera...

Only using the camera and kit lens from it now..

I have:
*70-300G = paperweight
*Elcrappo tripod
*256mb CF card which is used for file transfer only
*crap camera case...
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby MHD on Mon Nov 28, 2005 3:45 pm

Best:
umm... that is harder...

I love my 105/2.8 micro
it would be a close call between that and the 50/1.4
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Zeeke on Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:34 pm

My D70... :o Just Joking

but the accessories that came with it were a joke..(got it from Ebay)... the tripod was a 3 legged desktop deal that was so flimsy and weak it couldnt even support the weight of my lil silver P&S.. the camera bag was so small that it couldnt even fit the d70 body.. the P&S just fits...

everything else ive been pretty happy with

Want a 80-200 VR... but the sigma 70-200 sigma will do me for now :)

Tim
D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent

My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net
My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com
User avatar
Zeeke
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1318
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:38 pm
Location: Sunshine Coast, Qld, AU

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:39 pm

Triumph TR7 and three wedding licences :wink:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Nnnnsic on Mon Nov 28, 2005 4:40 pm

sirhc55 wrote:Triumph TR7 and three wedding licences :wink:


Triumph make cameras now do they? :lol:
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Killakoala on Mon Nov 28, 2005 5:40 pm

I have a Tokina 100-300mm F5.6-F6.7

Sure, it's old, but it was crap when i bought it and it's still crap now.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Dug on Mon Nov 28, 2005 7:53 pm

1966 i bought a Diana 120 camera for $2.

I fell in love with photography and have spent the rest of my life chasing the perfect photo.

No regrets really. I have had so much fun, seen so much, been to so many amazing places and met such wonderful people.


I have just been given a Diana 120 flash camera I must get out and use it soon.
User avatar
Dug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1082
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 7:58 pm
Location: maroochydore Q

Postby Oneputt on Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:08 pm

Chris how can you put a TR7 and three wedding licences in the same sentence? :lol: Come to think of it I cannot remember a TR7 :wink:
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Glen on Mon Nov 28, 2005 8:12 pm

Oneputt, the ad for a TR7 had a leggy blonde and asked the question "can a 6ft blonde find happiness with a 5'2" accountant?". The car was yellow. Having met Chris I can confirm he is not a 5'2" accountant. The TR7 was like a swiss watch compared to their Stag, that was a real POS.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby LOZ on Tue Nov 29, 2005 7:51 am

a SOFT 24-120 VR LOZ
User avatar
LOZ
Senior Member
 
Posts: 615
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2005 6:47 pm
Location: Hills

Postby Geoff on Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:31 am

Haven't really had any bad buys, but as Scott said the crappy bag that came with my D70 was practically useless - so it was ebayed.

Best buys..whoa..hmm..thats a tough one. I'd have to say the 50mm 1.4 and the 70-200VR!

Next on my purchase list is a tripod! :D
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby birddog114 on Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:38 am

LOZ wrote:a SOFT 24-120 VR LOZ


LOZ,
Sorry to hear that! but you can fly back to Japan and return the lens for service while you there.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby gstark on Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:49 am

sirhc55 wrote:Triumph TR7 and three wedding licences :wink:


TR7.

Three marriages ...

Sigma lenses ....

Anybody else seeing a pattern here? :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:51 am

Oneputt wrote:Chris how can you put a TR7 and three wedding licences in the same sentence? :lol: Come to think of it I cannot remember a TR7 :wink:


A few years ago they used them for the parade lap before the Melbourne F1GP.

But they could only find 21 that were able to make it around the circuit under their own power; the final car (1 for each driver) was not a TR7. :)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:53 am

My cat ??

:)
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Re: Have you ever made a "bad purchase"

Postby horstflotow on Tue Nov 29, 2005 1:41 pm

Sigma 70-210 f2.8 great lens when new, now has foggy rear lens element which Sigma won't repair/replace.

A few of the "kit lenses" that came with various cameras and other accessories like camera cases that would require a shoehorn to stuff a Minox in and tripods that even Ebay cannot remove from your storage area.

Ah well, it's live and learn (and get what you pay for).
horstflotow
Newbie
 
Posts: 30
Joined: Wed Oct 27, 2004 4:20 pm
Location: Singapore

Postby tasadam on Tue Nov 29, 2005 2:47 pm

Hhmmm "regretted" - strong word. I suppose I am happy with all I have owned and do own camera-wise.

Even tho my Olympus C750 broke down 3 timeswithin a year so they replaced it with the C770,
and the batteries for that are sh!tty and don't last, and it broke down too and had to be repaired,
and having an instant digital like that made me realise I couldn't do enough with my photography with it so I had to go get a D70,
and now my D70 is off for repairwith a stuck shutter,
and I currently have on loan the 80-200 f2.8 which makes me realise what a POS the 70-300G kit lens is,
and then there's my F80 which is 5 years old and hasn't been used for 3 years and isn't worth spit now,
and all my other film gear that will never be used again - including 2 bodies and various lenses that go with,
and my Metz 45-CT4 flash that makes a greatly bright flash but compared to what an SB800 will do really makes it obsolete,
oh and then there was that 110 film camera when I was a kid...

No regrets, only lessons...
Share what you know, learn what you don't.
Wilderness Photography of Tasmania http://www.tasmaniart.com.au
User avatar
tasadam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 631
Joined: Thu Dec 16, 2004 10:57 am
Location: Near Devonport, Tasmania

Postby Potatis on Tue Nov 29, 2005 8:32 pm

I've outgrown my camera bag. I should have got a bigger one. I thought I'd never need more than 2 lenses. Then I met you lot! It won't go to waste though, Genista will use it when she (or I) buys her camera, whenever that is. Otherwise I'm happy with all my camera gear and wouldn't part with any of it.
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby Steffen on Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:11 am

Not really anything I regretted getting, but some stuff I got rid of:

Back in the 90's I had one of those 35-80 f/4-5.6 AF-D zooms. I sold it, I guess because I don't like slow lenses and I'm not too fond of zooms. In hindsight I must say this was a pretty good lens (it was the earlier metal mount version with aspherical element, not the later crappy all-plastic one), great colour and contrast.

I also got rid of my 50 f/1.8 AF-D. A fine little lens, but I rarely used it. I found myself reaching for the 35 f/1.4 Ai or the 85 f/1.8 AF instead most of the time. For close range/indoor shots I already had the (hefty) 50 f/1.2 AiS.

A Tamron 70-200 f/4-5.6 zoom. Blech! But no regrets, I sold it for as much as I bought it for...

Wait, there maybe one regrettable purchase: I got a 135 f/2.8 AiS quite few years ago. Tossing up between that one and the 105 I decided to get the 135, since I already had the 85. Great performer, very compact, nothing wrong with it whatsoever. That was in the 35mm age. Today, after the 1.5 inflation, I wish I had gone for the 105. Then again, maybe I just have to rediscover it for the new format...

Cheers
Steffen
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby mchampio on Wed Nov 30, 2005 2:41 pm

A few people in this thread have commented on camera bags that ran out of room.

I have just spent a frustrating lunchtime trying to replace my 20 year old Lowepro mini mag deluxe.
I have a D70, 18-70, 70-300G and an SB-600. This isn't much gear, compared to a lot of the more wealthy (or poorer) members of this group.
My only requirements were: all the stuff fitted and I wanted to be able to lift the D70 with 18-70 in and out of the bag

I tried to stuff this gear into the Lowepro AW 2, AW 3, Off Road, Off Trail and the new Mini Mag AW, just like it shows in the pictures on the Lowepro site.
I came to the conclusion that the camera, flash and lenses in the pictures on the Lowepro site are definitely not made by Nikon!

So I walked out with my trusty old bag, which at least presents a less tempting target for theft.
User avatar
mchampio
Member
 
Posts: 50
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2005 12:36 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Steffen on Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:17 pm

mchampio wrote:I came to the conclusion that the camera, flash and lenses in the pictures on the Lowepro site are definitely not made by Nikon!


I've been hunting for a combined photo/laptop backpack for the last few weeks, and came across the Lowepro CompuTrekker series. The marketing blurb promises room for "pro SLR's with battery grip", but the backpacks simply don't have enough depth for my D2H. I ended up ordering a Tamrac, that has the full 6 inches, and still comes with a laptop pocket. Expecting delivery any day now... :D

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Mal on Wed Nov 30, 2005 3:51 pm

Nikon CP5700 - I tried to convience myself that this was a DSLR, mainly because I could not come up with enough money to buy the D70.

Well it only took six months with the CP5700 before I realised my mistake and took the plunge and bought the D70. Thankfully I was able to offload the CP5700 to someone who thought it was the bee's knees and was willing to pay a good price for it!
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby birddog114 on Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:35 pm

Mal wrote:Nikon CP5700 - I tried to convience myself that this was a DSLR, mainly because I could not come up with enough money to buy the D70.

Well it only took six months with the CP5700 before I realised my mistake and took the plunge and bought the D70. Thankfully I was able to offload the CP5700 to someone who thought it was the bee's knees and was willing to pay a good price for it!


So another victim with your CP5700 :lol: he/ she might off load it for the D200 soon :lol: :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby MattC on Wed Nov 30, 2005 5:51 pm

Mal,

You are lucky. You managed to sell yours. My CP5700 died before the arrival of my D70. Great little camera but the shutter lag had me howling at times. BTW, my CP5700 cost more than the D70 kit.

My most disappointing camera related purchase is the 70-300G. I learnt real quick that you get what you pay for.
My best bargain is probably the 50/1.8. Great bang for the buck, but unfortunately never used these days. I bought a 50/1.4 only a few weeks after buying the 50/1.8.
My most valued purchase? That would be a toss up between my tripod and SB800 for their ability to open up more shooting opportunities.

Cheers
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA


Return to General Discussion