D70 kit lens sharpness when stopped down

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

D70 kit lens sharpness when stopped down

Postby samester on Tue Dec 06, 2005 12:33 am

Hi,

Just wondering if anyone here has any thoughts on the smallest aperture with the kit lens that can be used without sacrificing too much sharpness.

I have run a few quick tests myself with small text at a distance but it really was inconclusive.

I like to always shoot for max DOF in my style of photography and only use shallow DOF in specific applications or if shooting sports.

Just wondering what everyone thinks about shooting at say F22 and smaller apertures with regards to sharpness - in partucular with the kit lens.

Cheers,
Sam
samester
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: Sydney, Penrith Area

Postby MCWB on Tue Dec 06, 2005 2:40 am

Sam, it's been a while since I had my kit lens, but I think it was sharpest between f/8 and f/11. YMMV though, why not just test yours? If you can't see a difference in sharpness between f/11 and (say) f/22 then you should have no qualms about shooting at f/22. :)
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby Onyx on Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:56 am

Systematic testing on my kit lens suggests the sharpest aperture was around f/11. Between f/12 and f/16 there was slight loss of sharpness (likely due to diffraction effects), which become more noticeable on the way towards f/22-f/29.

It's also better at the long end than the wide - 18mm is a blurry as heck (at least for my discerning standards) unless stopped down, and zooming in slightly to about 24-26mm yielded much improvement in sharpness.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Oneputt on Tue Dec 06, 2005 8:14 am

Some while ago I posted some shots here taken at f22, which some people took for shots with a dedicated macro lens. Mine was still sharp at the aperture.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby marcotrov on Tue Dec 06, 2005 9:51 am

Must agree with oneputt I've been very impressed with the overall sharpness of the kit lens. F8 to F11 is best from about 20-24mm (yes the wide end could be better :( ) to the long end no problems. Great value lens.
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby samester on Tue Dec 06, 2005 10:41 am

MCWB wrote: why not just test yours?


have tested mine with varying results - made me go a little cross-eyed :?

seems ok at f22, just wondering when diffraction might kick in.
samester
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: Sydney, Penrith Area

Postby MHD on Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:45 am

Kit lens is a pretty good bit of gear where sharpness is concerned... and good value for the price...

The main issue that will eventually drive my purchase of a new "normal range" zoom will be the speed...

and the kit does vignette when wide
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby owen on Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:54 am

I've got an image at home which I'll post an example of, taken with the kit lens and a polariser and I was blown away with the sharpness of it. It's an excellent lens.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby Onyx on Tue Dec 06, 2005 12:20 pm

More than you ever need to know about diffraction.
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutori ... graphy.htm

Aaccording to the diffraction limit calculator on that page, a 6MP D70 outputting a 10 inch print viewed at standard distance with 20/20 eyesight, becomes diffraction limited crossing over from f/13 and f/16, ie. circle of confusion = twice pixel size, akin to pixel peeping at 100% on monitor.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Steffen on Tue Dec 06, 2005 12:48 pm

I have to agree with Onyx. I don't own this particular lens, but f/22 is usually somewhat past "tack sharp" for any lens in the 35mm or DX formats.

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Oneputt on Tue Dec 06, 2005 1:58 pm

Tech jargon and specs can be quoted ad infinitum but...................it is what the lens produces that counts for everything.
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby Onyx on Tue Dec 06, 2005 3:28 pm

Oneputt wrote:Tech jargon and specs can be quoted ad infinitum but...................it is what the lens produces that counts for everything.


Sure, but know that no matter how hard you try, one cannot bend the laws of physics - and since photography is about light, understanding the properties of light will be beneficial in getting the most out of it.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Oneputt on Tue Dec 06, 2005 5:01 pm

I understand that of course, but sometimes we get so carried away with the tech side of things we forget to see. :D
"The good thing about meditation is that it makes doing nothing respectable"

D3 - http://www.oneputtphotographics.com
User avatar
Oneputt
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3174
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:58 pm
Location: Stuck in traffic Maroochydore.

Postby samester on Tue Dec 06, 2005 5:42 pm

Onyx wrote:More than you ever need to know about diffraction.
http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tutori ... graphy.htm


yep that is more than i ever need to know :)

overcoming laziness i ventured into the garden 10 mins ago for a quick test.

sharpness was measured using my manufacturers spec eye :wink:
quite acceptable at F22, markedly better at F16, best at F8-F11.

little inconclusive though, bit cloudy outside, cam was handheld and i had to bump up the iso to ward off camera shake which introduced noise, detracting from the overall sharpness of each pic.
samester
Member
 
Posts: 122
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2005 10:33 pm
Location: Sydney, Penrith Area


Return to General Discussion