New lens speculation

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

New lens speculation

Postby antman on Sat Dec 10, 2005 2:25 pm

For what it's worth ??????

http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1021&message=16207748

AF-S VR Zoom-Nikkor 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6G IF-ED

AF-S VR Micro-Nikkor 105mm f/2.8G IF-ED

Would be interesting if true.

(Apologies if posted previously).
Geoff C

My Gallery:http://geoffc.smugmug.com/
User avatar
antman
Member
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Thu Mar 31, 2005 5:41 pm
Location: Frenchs Forest, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Sat Dec 10, 2005 3:22 pm

Hmmm.. must be better then the 70-300G if it exits, but will wait and see.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby losfp on Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:09 pm

Hmmm.. interesting. Will definitely keep an eye out for this one, could bridge the gap between "I want" and "I can afford" :D :D
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby Onyx on Sat Dec 10, 2005 4:34 pm

I certainly hope the Micro-Nikkor makes to beyond speculation - that would be a sweet portrait and macro lens, nice focal length with AF-S, and bonus VR to boot.

Sadly I think it's more a case of wishful thinking - there's been a perceived lack of VR in Nikon's lens lineup in recent past, after Nikon invented the technology and brought it to market first, Canon's IS range grew to surpass Nikon's and I guess this is the overcompensating speculation.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Killakoala on Sat Dec 10, 2005 9:36 pm

A logical step from Nikon but i'll believe it when i see it.

DPreview is not exactly renowned for it's accuracy, there's too many people on there who are pretty good with photoshop. :)

IE: from the same website as the pics
http://www.club-nikon.org/links/digital_f5.htm
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Manta on Sun Dec 11, 2005 12:15 pm

Killakoala wrote:DPreview is not exactly renowned for it's accuracy, there's too many people on there who are pretty good with photoshop. :)

IE: from the same website as the pics
http://www.club-nikon.org/links/digital_f5.htm


What a hoot! Clever stuff.

Back on track... I personally would benefit greatly from VR on the 105mm Micro as anyone who's seen my poorly focussed attempts using BlacknStormy's lens can attest. Getting shaky in my old age... :evil:
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4
http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
User avatar
Manta
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year
 
Posts: 3815
Joined: Tue Nov 30, 2004 10:49 pm
Location: Hamilton Qld

Postby avkomp on Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:34 pm

I drink too much coffee so vr would definitely help me!!

Steve
User avatar
avkomp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2485
Joined: Sun May 29, 2005 8:47 pm
Location: Bendoura NSW - Nikon D5

Postby marcotrov on Mon Dec 12, 2005 7:39 pm

As they say in the ol' ghetto parlance - 'Bring it on !!' :twisted:
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Re: New lens speculation

Postby Steffen on Tue Dec 13, 2005 12:00 am



They're ill-informed, as usual. Here's what I heard:

There will only be one new lens, a lens to end all lens lust. The new lens will be a 12-400 f/1.4. It will only be 18cm long and have a 52mm filter thread. Impossible you say? Well, it uses Nikon's yet to be unveiled quantum-optics technology. Naturally, it'll feature VR and do 1:1 macro. Unlike other AF lenses, it won't draw power from the camera's battery but instead charge it from the light energy it would have gathered by now if it had been produced a million years ago (don't ask me, I don't quite understand that quantum stuff either).

This is an noteworthy departure from their original plan to use conventional optics. The (naturally huge) conventionally constructed lens was rumoured to feature an anti-gravitational device that not only relieved the photographer of it's own weight but carried the whole photo bag for her/him. It is believed that hitherto unnamed sponsors of that technology have withdrawn their approval to introduce it to earthlings, errr, the professional photography market at this stage...

Now, you be the judge, which sounds more believable?

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW


Return to General Discussion