Epson R2400 & Hahanemühle P-Rag 308 gsm

Had a play with something interesting? Got something that we all covet? Found a real lemon? Write a few lines about it, and share your experiences.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Epson R2400 & Hahanemühle P-Rag 308 gsm

Postby Sheetshooter on Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:53 am

I have been experiencing issues with this combination — paper not 'feeding' consistently and ink streaking in both the image area and the margins.

Well, I finally got through to the local Epson Meister and got an answer on these problems concerning the R2400 and Hahnemühle Photo Rag 308gsm paper.

In his OFFICIAL explanation he said that the R2400 is made to take paper up to, and including, 260gsm only. Even in using the front feed slot for so-called 'heavyweight paper' there are issues. The thickness of the paper brings the surface too close to the print head which causes blocking and streaking.

Hope this sheds some light for others. Cheers,
_______________

Walter

"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Sheetshooter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Dec 20, 2005 11:57 am

So what's the R1800 take up to?

I'd be interested to see if the R1800 is identical in paper weight limitations because then... why is the R2400 considered the one to get if you print on art paper?
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Glen on Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:09 pm

Leigh, I remember reading somewhere it was about the same. that is why I had problems with canvas
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Nnnnsic on Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:32 pm

Which is what I expected and begs the question... if the R1800 has similar paper weight limitations, why is the R2400 considered the one for art paper is art paper is obviously heavier?
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Sheetshooter on Tue Dec 20, 2005 12:33 pm

The recommendation of the voice on the phone was that for papers of that weight it was necessary to go to the 4800 or bigger.

I still like the idea of the R2400 because of the K3 inks and given that my primary concern is for B&W printing that is a factor that is foremost for me.

All of this is a suck-it-and-see, really. If I am happy with what inkjet can do with regard to my expectations then I would get a bigger machine and possibly use the Piezography K-7 set-up.

Cheers,
_______________

Walter

"Photography was not a bastard left by science on the doorstep of art, but a legitimate child of the Western pictorial tradition." - Galassi
Sheetshooter
Senior Member
 
Posts: 891
Joined: Tue May 10, 2005 8:29 pm
Location: Lushly Latino Leichhardt


Return to Equipment Reviews