Optech straps secure enough?

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Optech straps secure enough?

Postby Matt. K on Sun Dec 19, 2004 8:40 pm

Anyone else starting to wonder if their Optech straps are really secure....at the loop-over end that attaches to the camera? That cord looks awful thin and I'm wondering if some some drughead grabs my camera and tugs...will I be left holding only the strap?
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Greg B on Sun Dec 19, 2004 8:56 pm

It is a fair question Matt, maybe you should leave your camera at home when you go to rave parties.

Alternatively, I wonder whether Optech has any specs available on skinny cord strength.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Onyx on Sun Dec 19, 2004 8:58 pm

Time to stop visiting Maroubra and other "fully sik" neighbourhoods methinks.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Killakoala on Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:00 pm

I too was thinking that but then i thought that if i carry my heavy Manfrotto monopod in my other hand, then any druggy that comes near me will have second thoughts.

Then again, they are more likely to seek easier targets than me anyway such as an unsuspecting Japanese tourist.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Matt. K on Sun Dec 19, 2004 9:11 pm

Greg
I kinda remember seeing this question asked on other forums but I can't recall seeing an answer. I think I'd like to be reassured that it could hold the weight of ...say....a Volvo?
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby MattC on Mon Dec 20, 2004 12:38 am

My concern is not with the end loops, but with those quick release clips. They make me real nervous.
The loops are one of those things that just need to be watched. When they show signs of wear they get tossed. Simple really.

If the strap were tested under the weight of say... a Volvo, I would bet that the loops would not be the point of failure.

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Greg B on Mon Dec 20, 2004 5:55 am

I do not disagree, however I can't help but think that if there were any issues with the loops or the quick release clips, we would have heard about it.

I would assume that only enthusiasts would buy these straps and replace what came with the camera, so if anybody's beloved gear had plummeted groundwards due to a strap failure, the word would be out there.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Raydar on Mon Dec 20, 2004 6:03 am

Good point mate :wink:

There using those clips on everything these day’s including Para shoots & climbing gear so I don’t think the wait of a cam will force them open.

But there’s always exceptions to the rules so if one fails it will be mine :cry:

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

Postby MattC on Mon Dec 20, 2004 1:29 pm

My concern about the clips stems partly from the manner in which I destroyed my last camera. In that case I caught the strap on something as I was walking and the camera was ripped out of my hands. That strap acted as a bungee cord, propelling it into a solid object.
Now my number one rule is that the strap remains around my neck. I do not much like the idea of losing my camera because I caught the camera or strap on something forcing the clips, having the clips interfered with somehow, or inadvertently not locking the clips properly. It is not the weight of the camera, but other influences that would concern me.
While I agree that the probability of those clips giving up is low, I think that there is more of a chance of losing the camera to those clips than the loops - providing that the loops are maintained in good condition and are binned when they show wear.
When it comes to my electronics, I live by Murphey's Law. If it can happen, it will, and it will happen to me.

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Greg B on Mon Dec 20, 2004 1:59 pm

mattco6974 wrote:My concern about the clips stems partly from the manner in which I destroyed my last camera. In that case I caught the strap on something as I was walking and the camera was ripped out of my hands. That strap acted as a bungee cord, propelling it into a solid object.


If it wasn't for the critical fact that this resulted in the destruction of your camera, it would be a very funny story. Or maybe its the way you tell it.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby MattC on Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:14 pm

Definitely not funny at the time - it almost had me in tears. That little incident left me with no camera for a couple of months until my tax return arrived. That is when I bought the D70. In some ways I am thankful that it did happen, because I ended up with a much better camera. It is a pity that it cost me a $2400 camera.

It would be a very funny (funny now) to see a sequence of shots showing what happened and my expression. BTW, the culprit was a tow ball, and the solid object was the inside of the right rear wheel of a.... Volvo 240!

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Onyx on Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:21 pm

Murphy is a b4stard sometimes... ;)
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby MattC on Mon Dec 20, 2004 2:46 pm

Or at least has one very sick sense of humour

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Matt. K on Mon Dec 20, 2004 7:44 pm

If it were any other type of car your camera would have survived and the car would have come off second best....but a Volvo 240! You had no hope there.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby MattC on Mon Dec 20, 2004 7:57 pm

After spending 5000+ hours in a tractor seat I feel right at home in a 240!


Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby Glen on Mon Dec 20, 2004 8:19 pm

Mattco, have you accustomed yourself to the slower speed of the 240 yet?
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby MattC on Mon Dec 20, 2004 8:28 pm

In comparison to what??? A '68 Masey Ferguson perhaps!

Seriously, it does cruise comfortably at 140km/hr between Tennant and Alice Springs, doing the 500km in less than 4 hours.

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA


Return to General Discussion