Before

After

More practice PPModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
More practice PP
back to basics...... very over done...... colors are washed out and now lack a lot of detail........
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Tend to agree with couple of posts up on the overdone part.
Lighting in the original is where the problems began.
The original has a moodiness and sense of mystery that the PP'd version lacks.
Sometimes it's tough to get it right. ![]() g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
The retouched version is slightly too bright for my liking, but I can see what you were trying to do... The first version is more moody, but lacks colour...
I couldn't resist having a crack at it Craig - what do you think??? ![]() For the record: Saturation +45 Hue -15 Contrast +15 Shadow +5% Highlights +20% Maybe I overdid it a little on the saturation, but you can play with that... Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
Better....... but you need to add a touch of cyan and green.......as your reds are a bit over done
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Agree with the above.
The lighting on those rocks didn't come from the lighting in the rest of the pic. Still overdone and clearly been digitally fixed. Can you tell I still shoot analog??? ![]()
Hi Craig
I'm not sure if everyone is trying to PP them far too much, but as mentioned previously, they are looking quite obviusly photoshopped. Had a 30 second play and perhaps just doing a basic levels, curves and slight saturation bump will keep the photo looking "realistic" whilst improving the look of the scene. Perhaps give it a go and see what you think. Unless this was taken in the outback of NT, they are some fairly outrageous red tones that have been introduced into the rocks. I'd refrain from using the HUE tool too much, on this (but that's my personal opinion) ![]() If you do re-PP, I'd be interested to see the outcome... Dave
Nikon D7000 | 18-105 VR Lens | Nikon 50 1.8G | Sigma 70-300 APO II Super Macro | Tokina 11-16 AT-X | Nikon SB-800 | Lowepro Mini Trekker AWII Photography = Compromise
Thanks for all the feedback, when I woke up this morning the PP'ed version appealed to me a lot less, I had another go (didn't touch hue).
Only modified contrast, shadow and highlights... so the colour should be a lot closer to the real thing. ![]()
You're getting their Craig and the original image stands on its own merits in ways. Sometimes the more you fiddle you can end up convincing yourself that something else is better. It's good to walk away, get a cuppa and do something different with your eyes and come back after 10-15 mins to have another look at before and after shots.
![]() ![]() cheers marco
Hi Craig.... I hope you don't mind but i gave it a quick 5 minute process to try and bring some details out without blowing highlights and making it feel washed out. Holla if you want me to remove the post
![]() ![]() Processing: PSCS2 1. convert to lab 2. adjust levels 3. adjust contrast 4. adjust curves colour, a & b 5. slight sharping (smart sharpen) 6. slight adjustment to hues 7. slight dodge and burn All done on the original jpg image you posted, hence some of the artifacts. cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
Thanks Mark and certainly no need to remove the shot, anyone's welcome to play with my shots, especially when I can learn a thing or two...
I think you've done well to bring out the detail but keep or add to the mystery of the orginal shot. I'll ask my Newbie question for the week, what is the different of converting to LAB ? Is it just another colour space, I've seen it mentioned a fair bit, but have no real understanding of why some do it and others don't... - Thanks!
Craig.. I'll let Sir Big Pix answer the LAB question.... personally I find LAB to give me more pop when processing and enhance detail.
cheers http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
These 2 images have been done using Lab Color with basic A and B channel correction....... The first image is correct on my profiled monitor but when uploaded to smugmug the shot has lost a lot of saturation and contrast and what you would call flattened out. To correct this I increased the saturation for the second image and got a little closer to what I wanted to post, but still with a lack of colour and contrast but lot closer........ I will be looking into this as the beer post made today the image there is also flat and lacks color when compared to the original..........
![]() ![]() Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer.... Removing objects that do not belong... happy for the comments, but .....Please DO NOT edit my image..... http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
Previous topic • Next topic
17 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|