Birds of a feather

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Birds of a feather

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:01 pm

While I was away I had a chance to take some bird shots, it isn't usually my thing but I thought I'd share them and get some feedback from the more seasoned bird lovers. Most of the shots are unfortunately cropped a fair bit, with the 80-200 or the 70-300 I was always wishing for more reach... I tried to get at the wrens level, but it was so skitish it kept flying off.

Image


Image

Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby marcotrov on Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:36 pm

The last shot is a beauty Craig. 2nd shot needs a dash of fill flash. Flash Extender(Better Beamer) will be your next purchase along with 80-400VR to get that reach :)
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Collingwood on Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:46 pm

Love the pelican shot!
I am biased to that one though because I love pelicans and intend to do an entire series on them in the future. Shot 2 ain't bad either but the softness is a bit too much in the first.
User avatar
Collingwood
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:55 am
Location: Melbourne SE

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:47 pm

Collingwood wrote:Love the pelican shot!
I am biased to that one though because I love pelicans and intend to do an entire series on them in the future. Shot 2 ain't bad either but the softness is a bit too much in the first.


Thanks for the comments I have more pelican shots... Batemans Bay always has plenty of pelicans ready to pose.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Re: Birds of a feather

Postby birddog114 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:03 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:.... with the 80-200 or the 70-300 I was always wishing for more reach...


There're 200-400VR, 300VR & 500mm are available at your pursuit :lol: :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby blacknstormy on Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:37 pm

You're evil Birdy :)
Instills lens lust in us all !!!!
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby LittleB on Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:42 pm

Pelican photo is great Craig. :)
LittleB
User avatar
LittleB
Member
 
Posts: 96
Joined: Mon Oct 10, 2005 9:14 pm
Location: Mosman, NSW, Australia

Postby stubbsy on Mon Jan 16, 2006 6:13 pm

Craig. The first one lacks interest for me - it's an odd looking sort of bird. The second shot is my favourite since we're seeing nird + habitat. The pelican shot isgood, but could be better with a little more brightness & contrast to add punch.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby kipper on Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:05 pm

The first bird is a Sooty Oystercatcher. Not sure what the non-breeding pairs do if they travel in groups, but so far I've only ever seen pairs of Oystercatchers whether Sooty or Pied.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:21 pm

kipper wrote:The first bird is a Sooty Oystercatcher. Not sure what the non-breeding pairs do if they travel in groups, but so far I've only ever seen pairs of Oystercatchers whether Sooty or Pied.


There was a pair of them, and your right, I've always seen them feeding in pairs.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Finch on Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:33 pm

Hi Craig,
Birds are great subjects to photograph, but not always easy. I agree with some of the earlier comments. First pic of Oyster-catchers is a bit soft, second pic of wren could do with some fill-flash which will highlight the eye (very important) and third shot of pelican is definitely the pic of the three. Love the bright blue background.

Keep clicking at those birds!

Cheers

Michael
User avatar
Finch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: Keperra, Brisbane

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:38 pm

The first pic appears to be out of focus and I do agree with Peter that the second shot is really good. Pelicans - they are becoming the new duck :lol: :lol:
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Finch on Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:46 pm

I agree with Chris and Peter- second shot of wren is good but needs a bit of fill flash to lighten face. Would be a corker then!
User avatar
Finch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 720
Joined: Tue Jan 10, 2006 3:49 pm
Location: Keperra, Brisbane

Postby Poon on Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:24 pm

Craig,
I like the third one.
It think that it is a make one.
Very attractive.
---
Regards
Poon
User avatar
Poon
The HK Connection
 
Posts: 323
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 9:32 pm
Location: Hong Kong

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:32 pm

Thanks for the encouragement, I actually nearly didn't include the pelican, I thought the angle was a bit funny, and there has been a excess in Pelican shots recently.
I must remember the fill flash something I didn't use at all this last week.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby rokkstar on Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:36 pm

The pick of the bunch would be the pelican shot Craig for me. I think a little contrast boost might give it that extra oomph.
#1 is a bit too OOF for me and #2 doesnt do anything for me I'm afraid.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 10:48 pm

rokkstar wrote:The pick of the bunch would be the pelican shot Craig for me. I think a little contrast boost might give it that extra oomph.
#1 is a bit too OOF for me and #2 doesnt do anything for me I'm afraid.


Thanks for the feedback Matt, here is an adjusted PP'ed version, is this closer to your suggested version ? Click for bigger.

Image
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques