The results of boredom - photoshop!!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

The results of boredom - photoshop!!

Postby rokkstar on Mon Jan 16, 2006 2:59 pm

Well, hmm, what to say about these?
I am off work for two days so have been rather bored. I shot some more self portraits and decided to try putting them into some sort of 'advertising' context.
I don't think many people will like them, but would appreciate C&C on them.

Image
Image

Cheers
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby wendellt on Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:01 pm

Looks like the new Levis campaign, very stylistic and big credit to your trademark lighting it rocks
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:02 pm

Hahahahaha, Matt Love these they really are something special. When I stop giggling I'll come back for a more 'composed critique'. :)

Wish my self portraits came out looking so good.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby rokkstar on Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:03 pm

Alpha_7 wrote:Hahahahaha, Matt Love these they really are something special. When I stop giggling I'll come back for a more 'composed critique'. :)

:lol:
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby stubbsy on Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:03 pm

Matt

these are exceptionally good and show you really have got this thing right. I'd ditch the PP'd in light flare though - it doersn't look real and adds nothing to the image. The colour treatment is spot on as is the font - gives a grungy sort of feel. Get bored more often.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Alpha_7 on Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:05 pm

stubbsy wrote:Matt

these are exceptionally good and show you really have got this thing right. I'd ditch the PP'd in light flare though - it doersn't look real and adds nothing to the image. The colour treatment is spot on as is the font - gives a grungy sort of feel. Get bored more often.


I agree the lighting, presentation, font and advertising lingo are great, but the lens flare not so good!
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby xerubus on Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:13 pm

i really like these shots.. well done.

i'd get rid of the lens flare and perhaps put make up a jeans or mens aftershave logo and put it there with an opacity of around 60%.

in the second shot i'd possibly do a little cloning and try and get rid of the slight reflection in the right hand lens of the glasses... but that's being picky ;)

nicely done... your portrait work is excellent.

cheers
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby marcotrov on Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:22 pm

You have nutted this form of lighting out brilliantly Matt. :) Powerful images, regardless of the 'bird' :wink:
cheers
marco
marcotrov
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2577
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2005 2:21 pm
Location: Cairns, Queensland, Australia

Postby Mal on Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:27 pm

I know others have said that they don't like the lens flare, but I think that it works, maybe would work better if the central point was actually not in shot though, or you were able to show an object that was greating the light source.
Love the images, well done.
Mal
I've got a camera, it's black. I've got some lens, they are black as well.
User avatar
Mal
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1091
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 2:18 pm
Location: Berowra, NSW.

Postby Collingwood on Mon Jan 16, 2006 4:55 pm

Great pics!
I don't like the lens flare because it doesn't belong. The shot doesn't look like it's outdoors so where is this light coming from?
The bird needs more light. It's a err..dominant part of the image, your eye goes straight to it and it's almost completely in shadow. Turn on the light switch! Needs just a touch more front and side lighting.
The feel of these is excellent and very well done.
User avatar
Collingwood
Member
 
Posts: 71
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 3:55 am
Location: Melbourne SE

Postby PiroStitch on Mon Jan 16, 2006 5:56 pm

The lens flare makes it look tacky.

I like the effect and mood you've created through the de-saturation and just the style in general looks awesome.
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
User avatar
PiroStitch
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4669
Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2005 1:08 am
Location: Hong Kong

Postby nito on Mon Jan 16, 2006 7:05 pm

Its cheesey and even cheesier with the flare. But yet I like it. :D
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW

Postby rokkstar on Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:11 pm

Thanks for the comments guys.
So it appears the lens flare is contentious. I ummed and ahhed about it in photoshop but decided to keep it in. I'll try some others perhaps without it.

I mean, they are just a bit of fun - it's pretty much an adaptation of a series of shots I saw with HEAVY lens flare in a magazine. Thanks again guys/
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby Geoff on Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:14 pm

Great shots mate, but get rid of the lens flares :)
Geoff
Special Moments Photography
Nikon D700, 50mm 1.4, 85mm 1.4, 70-200 2.8VR, SB800 & some simple studio stuff.
User avatar
Geoff
Moderator
 
Posts: 7791
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 12:08 am
Location: Freshwater - Northern Beaches, Sydney.

Postby Onyx on Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:20 pm

 LOL, Matt - these should have been posted in the humour section, cos they're certainly worth a laugh. I can see you're not taking yourself seriously so I hope you know I meant no offense by it. ;)

The lighting is gorgeous, awesome contrast across the image - tho I'm thinking deliberate vignetting of the frame might add further impact to this strong contrasty look.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby rokkstar on Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:36 pm

Onyx wrote:LOL, Matt - these should have been posted in the humour section, cos they're certainly worth a laugh. I can see you're not taking yourself seriously so I hope you know I meant no offense by it. ;)
.


Nah mate, don't worry about it. These are very much tounge in cheek shots Chi. Glad you enjoyed them :)
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200

Postby spartikus on Mon Jan 16, 2006 9:44 pm

these are fricken great - love the lighting. What sort of setup did you use? btw nice hat :/
Chris
photoblog
User avatar
spartikus
Member
 
Posts: 192
Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2005 2:43 pm
Location: Perth, W.A. - dee-seventy

Postby blacknstormy on Mon Jan 16, 2006 11:26 pm

Love em Matt - well done !!!!
Dodging and burning are steps to take care of mistakes God made in establishing tonal relationships! -Ansel Adams

http://www.redbubble.com/people/blacknstormy
User avatar
blacknstormy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2745
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Ipswich Qld

Postby rokkstar on Tue Jan 17, 2006 12:05 pm

spartikus wrote:these are fricken great - love the lighting. What sort of setup did you use? btw nice hat :/


Spartikus, the lighting set up was my trademark uber simplicity. SB600 firing through a homemade softbox at 45 degrees to the camera. large white reflector left of camera to reflect back some light.

Thanks for the comments Rel.
Matt
User avatar
rokkstar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1432
Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2005 4:27 pm
Location: Miserable cold wet England - D200


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques