300mm f/4D ED-IF AF-S

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

300mm f/4D ED-IF AF-S

Postby dk on Tue Feb 14, 2006 4:33 am

I wasn't sure exactly where to post this topic.

I am still considering which telephoto to purchase (weeks now). It hasn't been an easy process. I keep going back and forth between the one listed in the subject line and the 80-200mm f/2.8. I'll be shooting more sports; races, equestrian events. I'll mostly be outside, lots of light (makes me lean toward the 300mm f/4). I've read hundreds of reviews and just this morning learned about the 39mm drop-in filter on the 300mm. I can't seem to find any info on the specifics. My question to the forum is this; under what circumstances would I use this filter or is it something I would use in every instance? I can't remember what the filter are made of, but are they expensive?

Thanks a million.

dk
"Do more than belong, participate. Do more than care, help. Do more than believe, practice. Do more than be fair, be kind. Do more than dream, work." -W. A. Ward
User avatar
dk
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Spanish Fork, Utah, USA

Postby gstark on Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:10 am

The filter is a part of the optical system and must be in place all of the time. You can replace it with other 39mm filters if you wish.

Being 39mm, no they're not overly expensive, but it is included with the lens when you buy it.

So, just forget about it. it's there, and it's not a concern.

What is your need in terms of reach? Will the 200 be enough? do you have, or are you considering getting, a TC?
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby dk on Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:26 am

Thanks Gary. I'm leaning toward the 300mm f/4 and when I look at sample images on pbase I find the reach will be more than adequate. I am also considering a TC to extend the reach to 420mm. Please forgive my ignorance on this subject; is the drop-in filter glass?

dk
"Do more than belong, participate. Do more than care, help. Do more than believe, practice. Do more than be fair, be kind. Do more than dream, work." -W. A. Ward
User avatar
dk
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Tue Nov 29, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Spanish Fork, Utah, USA

Postby gstark on Tue Feb 14, 2006 9:47 am

I've not subjected mine to a Wendelling (tested it till it breaks) but I believe so: Nikon optical glass, even.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW


Return to General Discussion