Nikon D2X or Canon 5D

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Nikon D2X or Canon 5D

Postby mic on Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:21 pm

Which would you go for :roll:

Mic. :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby bloop on Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:23 pm

D2X of course! Why? Because my Nikon lenses don't work on a 5D.
User avatar
bloop
Member
 
Posts: 128
Joined: Wed Jun 22, 2005 12:06 am
Location: Chipping Norton, NSW

Postby phillipb on Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:29 pm

They could with a nikon to canon adapter
__________
Phillip


**Nikon D7000**
User avatar
phillipb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2599
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**

Postby Alpha_7 on Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:43 pm

Well I've only every played with Wendell's D2X, the only canon I have played with is the 300D. Not fair to compare the two as they are at opposite ends of the spectrum. But from my limited experience with the two, I'd go the D2X.
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Michael on Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:49 pm

I used the 5D with the grip thingo one day, didn't like it one iota!
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby shutterbug on Tue Mar 28, 2006 9:59 pm

Hi mic,

Get D2X for fast focus and nikon flash system.

Get 5D for its smooth high iso images.

i am think about going "Bi" later this year.

Vince
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby kipper on Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:11 pm

I really don't see how you could really hate Canons over the fact that they feel alien to use. Of course they would, you've been used to one type of system for a while. It's like going from a mac to a pc or vice versa, or from normal mouse to inverted (for all the fps gamers out there). If you were brought up on Canon you'd probably say the same about Nikon. To convert your going to have to use the system for a while to get the other out of your blood.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby mic on Tue Mar 28, 2006 10:34 pm

Yeah, I'm not as Evil as Stubbsy :twisted: Going to use a Canon :roll: but I just can't for the life of me know why you would fork out $6700 on a D2X and not have a full frame sensor like the Canon and smooth ISO above 800. I think the D2X would have to be pretty close to the perfect camera but why can't they give us super smooth images for forking out such a shitload of money :roll:

Mic :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby nito on Tue Mar 28, 2006 11:06 pm

darryl, but its true. Some key meshing combos on a canon system are totally illogical or awkward to perform.
nito
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1109
Joined: Sat May 14, 2005 11:24 am
Location: Gladesville, NSW

Postby Nnnnsic on Wed Mar 29, 2006 1:05 am

While I've played with both the 5D and the 1DsMk2, I still find that Nikon's are better built and designed, as well as faster. I go the D2x, but I'd probably take the D2h. :)
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Grev on Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:38 am

This is a tough, even when I like Nikon better... :wink:
Blog: http://grevgrev.blogspot.com
Deviantart: http://grebbin.deviantart.com

Nikon: D700 / D70 / AiS 28mm f2 / AiS 35mm f1.4 / AiS 50mm f1.2 / AiS 180mm f2.8 ED / AFD 85mm f1.4 / Sigma 50mm f1.4 / Sigma 24-70 f2.8 macro / Mamiya 80mm f1.9 x2 /Mamiya 120mm f4 macro
User avatar
Grev
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1025
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 4:10 pm
Location: 4109, Brisbane.

Postby birddog114 on Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:01 am

mic,
Get the D2x for Dx
or Canon 1Ds Mk II for full frame.

Ditch the D200 or Canon 5D.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:34 am

kipper wrote:I really don't see how you could really hate Canons over the fact that they feel alien to use. Of course they would, you've been used to one type of system for a while. It's like going from a mac to a pc or vice versa, or from normal mouse to inverted (for all the fps gamers out there). If you were brought up on Canon you'd probably say the same about Nikon. To convert your going to have to use the system for a while to get the other out of your blood.


kipper,
I used to have two systems Nikon & Canon from day 1, and I selected Nikon as my main rig, they're both excellent systems but then there're pros and cons.
At the end of the day: I'm owning Nikon gears coz Nikon is more and easily to use, one lens fits all bodies, and soon there will be with Canon gears in my inventory, I don't hate Canon.

Are you going to switch to Canon soon? nothing loose on your side, the Nikkor 500/ AF-S will bring you a windfall once you're in Europe, the D70 and kit lens or 50/1.4 also can add more $$$ to your new venture, that's and all you have atm, I guess so. Off load them overthere and convert to Canon. I'm looking forward to welcome you on Canon board.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Killakoala on Wed Mar 29, 2006 6:53 am

How about neither. I'm happy with the combination i have right now. A D2H for digital and an F5 for film. The D2H gives me the varsatility of digital while the F5 and a negative scanner gives me a Nikon camera and full frame capability, plus all the benefits of film and I can use my nice glass on both.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby LostDingo on Wed Mar 29, 2006 7:27 am

Birddog114 wrote:mic,
Get the D2x for Dx
or Canon 1Ds Mk II for full frame.

Ditch the D200 or Canon 5D.


I would have to agree although I have not used the 1Ds MkII

At the end of the day both are excellent camera manufacturers and there is a alot of personal preference that takes place. Most would stick with whatever brand they started with so hats off to Stubbsy.

How disimilar would this be from saying Ford over GM?
User avatar
LostDingo
Senior Member
 
Posts: 951
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2005 8:18 am
Location: Rozelle

Postby gstark on Wed Mar 29, 2006 8:53 am

Fuji disposable for me.

Water resistant, of course.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Hlop on Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:05 am

I woudn't go Canon - I just don't FEEL it in my hands. Recently I was using mostly two Hasselblad cameras - they are completely different from Nikon but I fell very comfortable with them in my hands and that's something I can not say about any model of Canon cameras I had a play with
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby kipper on Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:08 am

Birddog, I'll have to consider it once I've landed myself a steady job over there. I really like Nikon, probably due to familiarity but as I said in the other forum I think IS is a god send. Nikon seems too slow off the mark to produce a VR large prime or large zoom (bigger than 200-400).

ps. I did read in an old mag that the 1Ds MKII was fullframe but didn't believe it for some reason.
Last edited by kipper on Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:13 am, edited 1 time in total.
Darryl (aka Kipper)
Nikon D200
kipper
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3738
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 9:23 pm
Location: Hampshire, UK

Postby birddog114 on Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:11 am

kipper wrote:Birddog, I'll have to consider it once I've landed myself a steady job over there. I really like Nikon, probably due to familiarity but as I said in the other forum I think IS is a god send. Nikon seems too slow off the mark to produce a VR large prime or large zoom (bigger than 200-400).


kipper,
You failed to turn up last night in Sydney for the deal we discussed :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby glamy on Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:05 pm

At one stage I was looking at the Kodak 14n, I would like a Canon 1Ds...
Cheers,
Gerard
User avatar
glamy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X

Postby wendellt on Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:11 pm

the d2x can d 12 megapixels
the 5d can do that and the benefits of canons high iso to low noise ratio
and thefull frame benefits

the d2x costs much more than the 5d

so go the 5D

the only thing the d2x is good for is speed and response
but really the end image output would be almost the same from both cameras
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:36 pm

wendellt wrote:
the d2x costs much more than the 5d

so go the 5D


Then force out big sum for your investment a new set of glasses suitable to the 5D, if money is not an object then it's a way to go, if not, stay back with your Nikon camp.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Nnnnsic on Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:43 pm

Yes, except for that with the way you treat your equipment Wendell, it would be broken quite quickly.

I don't mean this to have a poke at you by any means but rather am going on what I've seen happen to your D2x and your lenses.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby wendellt on Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:56 pm

Nnnnsic wrote:Yes, except for that with the way you treat your equipment Wendell, it would be broken quite quickly.

I don't mean this to have a poke at you by any means but rather am going on what I've seen happen to your D2x and your lenses.


cool

I already said i can get a 5d because i don't need to invest in a canon lens system, it wil last long enough till the next model comes out
the photoagency i work for has a range of duplicate canon lenses for the crew to use they have nearly every canon L series lens out there even a 600mm and they are willing to lend them out to the crew to get the job done the lenses get replaced quite often.
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby gstark on Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:13 pm

wendellt wrote: it wil last long enough till the next model comes out


When did Canon switch to weekly new model releases??
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby wendellt on Wed Mar 29, 2006 4:18 pm

gstark wrote:
wendellt wrote: it wil last long enough till the next model comes out


When did Canon switch to weekly new model releases??


:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
wendellt
Outstanding Member of the year (Don't try this at home.)
 
Posts: 4078
Joined: Sun Feb 20, 2005 10:04 am
Location: Dilettante Outside the City Walls, Sydney

Postby mic on Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:11 pm

Thanks for all the different points of view, now I know for sure what I have to do NOT ! :roll:

Stubbsy, what the hell have you started, threads popping up everywhere, Canon taking head counts, what is to become of us all :roll: :roll:

I will have to get my tatoo of Nikon scraped off my right bum cheek, I wonder where I could fit the Canon :roll: maybe on ma you know what, but then I would be bragging :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Mic :wink:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC

Postby gstark on Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:13 pm

mic wrote:I will have to get my tatoo of Nikon scraped off my right bum cheek, I wonder where I could fit the Canon :roll: maybe on ma you know what, but then I would be bragging :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Mine normally just says "Nikon", but at certain times it actually reads, fully, "Nikkormat".
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby mic on Wed Mar 29, 2006 9:17 pm

Classic reply Gary :lol: :lol:
User avatar
mic
Retired Egg Flipper
 
Posts: 2167
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 2:33 pm
Location: Glen Waverly VIC


Return to General Discussion