80-400 VR MACRO? aka; Definition of Macro

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

80-400 VR MACRO? aka; Definition of Macro

Postby PlatinumWeaver on Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:17 pm

What does 'Macro' mean?
What does a lens have to do in order to be called a macro lens?

I have a 70-300 Tamron lens with a macro feature from 180mm onwards and it would seem to me that most of what a macro lens does is focus closer.

So if you took a regular zoom lens, say for example the 80-400VR, and magically made it able to focus closer, would that be considered having a macro function?

The reason I ask is that while drooling over reviews of the aforementioned lens I saw a reference to a.. :shock: Canon :x product, the 500D Closeup Lens. This is basically like a thick filter that you whack on the from of a 77mm lens and it reduces the minimum focus distance, with what seems to be no lack of picture quality. In the case of the 80-400, it apparently reduces the minimum focus distance from 7'6" to 18" or from 2.2metres to 45cms..

I guess i'm just looking for opinions as to how people think this would work out, if they've had experience with this kind of system ( i know I read about people using nikon's system similar to this '6M'? )
PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions
<a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
PlatinumWeaver
Member
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Postby xerubus on Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:22 pm

the absolute basics are how close you can focus to life-sized or beyond... I use a sigma 300 macro with a 6t attached, but that will never give clean results like the tamron 90mm sp macro lens with a couple of extension tubes.

rather than me dribbling on and on (plus the fact i'm at work and a little busy)... take a look at the following article..

http://www.nikonians.org/html/resources ... cro_1.html

cheers
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby Greg B on Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:28 pm

Good question PW. As you know, I have the same Tanron 70-300 that you do, and I must admit I have been wondering what actually happens when the little macro switch is activated to put the lens into macro mode.

Not the same question, but vaguely relevant I think.

:)
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby PlatinumWeaver on Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:32 pm

Of course, one thing I failed to consider is that the mininum focussing distance will be for the 80 end, not the 400..

Does anyone (mudder?) know the minimum distance the lens can focus @ 400mm?
PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions
<a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
PlatinumWeaver
Member
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:33 pm

Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby birddog114 on Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:35 pm

Canon 500D is close up filter not lens
When you talking macro, you have to see macro in 1:1/ 1:/2 or 1:3 etc...
80-400 or 70-200VR can be attached a Canon 500D filter/ 77mm (AU$200) to them to shoot macro in MANUAL mode only.
It works but have to be patience with manual zoom. I have this baby and play around with it a bit.
The monies you're invest in the closeup filter is better to go straight to Nikon 60/2.8 macro or Tamron 90/2.8 macro lens.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby PlatinumWeaver on Tue Jan 04, 2005 3:47 pm

sorry - meant filter, not lens. :oops:

Thanks for the super rapid replies!
PlatinumWeaver / Dean
Asking the Stupid Questions
<a href="http://www.platinumweaver.net/" alt="PlatinumWeaver Homepage">http://www.platinumweaver.net/</a>
PlatinumWeaver
Member
 
Posts: 498
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 3:43 pm
Location: Melbourne, VIC

Postby Kristine on Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:20 pm

Birddog114 wrote:The monies you're invest in the closeup filter is better to go straight to Nikon 60/2.8 macro or Tamron 90/2.8 macro lens.


How much is the Tamron 90/2.8 lens?
Kristine
Member
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:02 pm
Location: Western Australia

Postby birddog114 on Tue Jan 04, 2005 4:37 pm

Kristine wrote:
Birddog114 wrote:The monies you're invest in the closeup filter is better to go straight to Nikon 60/2.8 macro or Tamron 90/2.8 macro lens.


How much is the Tamron 90/2.8 lens?


Kristine,
It's around AU$600.00
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Greg B on Tue Jan 04, 2005 5:32 pm

Further complications :)

Macro possibilities...
Nikon 105
Sigma 105
Tamron 90

Lusting....
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne


Return to General Discussion