Old is gold ?

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Old is gold ?

Postby ajax on Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:21 pm

Hi,

While strolling thru Melb cbd, in a shop's showcase noticed a AF Nikkor 70-210 f4-5.6D for sale at A$320 (secondhand). Normally wouldn't have paid attention, but had read about this particular lens on some website -- dont remember which one !

Anyway is it a good price ?

cheers,
ajax
User avatar
ajax
Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:13 am
Location: Glen Waverley, VIC

Re: Old is gold ?

Postby birddog114 on Fri Dec 24, 2004 4:24 pm

ajax wrote:Hi,

While strolling thru Melb cbd, in a shop's showcase noticed a AF Nikkor 70-210 f4-5.6D for sale at A$320 (secondhand). Normally wouldn't have paid attention, but had read about this particular lens on some website -- dont remember which one !

Anyway is it a good price ?

cheers,
ajax


It's OK, reasonable price for a used lens of that type.
But have to test on your camera first, second, please check to see what condition of that.
Edit: or you can buy the Sigma 70-300 APO cheaper than that price.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Onyx on Fri Dec 24, 2004 5:19 pm

You might have come across it on Ken Rockwell's site. Ken is a big fan of that lens, and will sing its praises whilst trashing the current generation's 70-300 in both flavours every chance he gets.

There is also a constant f/4 version of that focal length (made late 80s) which is supposed to be slightly better too.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Kristine on Fri Dec 24, 2004 5:31 pm

I have owned two of theses lenses - both well under the price you have quoted. Check out eBay - I sold one in excellent condition for $224.00 ($1NR auction) another person just sold for one for $150.00.

HTH

Cheers
Kristine
Kristine
Member
 
Posts: 211
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 7:02 pm
Location: Western Australia

Postby ajax on Fri Dec 24, 2004 9:36 pm

Birddog,

It's OK, reasonable price for a used lens of that type.
But have to test on your camera first, second, please check to see what condition of that.
Edit: or you can buy the Sigma 70-300 APO cheaper than that price.


Now I am confused. There are 3 70-300 around same price mark, oz retail ~$220.
sigma 70-300 apo
tamron 70-300
and ofcourse nikkor 70-300G.

Which one to go for ?

cheers.
User avatar
ajax
Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:13 am
Location: Glen Waverley, VIC

Used Nikkor Zoom

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri Dec 24, 2004 10:23 pm

Sorry for butting in on this thread, but I have a similar zoom lens for sale at the moment, having just upgraded to the 70-200 vr.

My lens is:
70-300 AF D Nikkor f4.0-5.6 ED

It is NOT the 70-300 G, it has the aperture ring; and it has the ED glass. I still have the original box and papers, and a Hoya UV filter is on the front; the lens is exactly 5 years old.

I recognise Birddog's point about a new Sigma lens, but this is a NIKON, and it is unmarked. I have been more than happy with it.

Make me an offer. :)
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Matt. K on Fri Dec 24, 2004 10:36 pm

Strongly urge you to test the lens before purchase. My experience is that out of a batch of 12 similar lenses...2 were outstanding, 2 were exceptable and the rest were atrocious. Seemed to be a lot of variation in the quality control. Seem to have read somewhere that these lenses were not even made by Nikon....but have lost the reference to that.
Test the crap out of it before parting with your money. Very sharp lenses are rarely sold second hand.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby Greg B on Fri Dec 24, 2004 11:01 pm

ajax wrote:Birddog,

It's OK, reasonable price for a used lens of that type.
But have to test on your camera first, second, please check to see what condition of that.
Edit: or you can buy the Sigma 70-300 APO cheaper than that price.


Now I am confused. There are 3 70-300 around same price mark, oz retail ~$220.
sigma 70-300 apo
tamron 70-300
and ofcourse nikkor 70-300G.

Which one to go for ?

cheers.


One possible consideration ajax - the Tamron and Sigma lenses have a 1:2 macro capability. I have the Tamron, and although I am now lusting a more serious macro, it has been nice to have that capability as a virtually free extra :) It probably depends on what you have and what you plan to get.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Glen on Tue Jan 04, 2005 10:28 pm

Ajax, heres one for a $100 on ebay if you are still thinking that way

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll ... 52684&rd=1
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Onyx on Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:45 pm

Glen our ever so vigilent second hand shopper - you're still browsing ebay and classifieds for lenses even though you've already bought far superior brand new alternatives? ;)
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

lens lust

Postby christiand on Tue Jan 04, 2005 11:54 pm

I'm thinking about purchasing the Nikon 70-200 VR.
This could make available to you a Sigma 70-300 APO Macro Super II.

It is up for sale depending on the offer you would like to make.

It is in pristine condition and has a HOYA UV(0) filter attached.

Cheers
CD
User avatar
christiand
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 1:36 pm
Location: Tuggeranong, ACT - Canberra

Postby ajax on Wed Jan 05, 2005 9:14 am

Glen and Christiand thanks for that.

ajax
User avatar
ajax
Member
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2004 8:13 am
Location: Glen Waverley, VIC

Postby Glen on Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:43 pm

Onyx, first glance in a long while, thought I would have a quick look to see if there were any macro lenses cheap, saw that and remebered Ajax's post. Going to purchase the 12-24 today, the version with the platinum band.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby birddog114 on Wed Jan 05, 2005 12:47 pm

Glen wrote:Onyx, first glance in a long while, thought I would have a quick look to see if there were any macro lenses cheap, saw that and remebered Ajax's post. Going to purchase the 12-24 today, the version with the platinum band.


Glen,
12-24 with platinum band :?: I only see gold band and gold letter, is the platinum band better than? :o
We're haeding to the Gold bank, gold strap, gold and gold :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby sirhc55 on Wed Jan 05, 2005 1:01 pm

Glen wrote:Onyx, first glance in a long while, thought I would have a quick look to see if there were any macro lenses cheap, saw that and remebered Ajax's post. Going to purchase the 12-24 today, the version with the platinum band.


Glad you are joining the club Glen - 12-24mm rules

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Glen on Wed Jan 05, 2005 1:14 pm

Chris, didn't want to be the last guy on the block with one! :D
The platinum band is very special :wink:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon


Return to General Discussion