Use of polariser

Had a play with something interesting? Got something that we all covet? Found a real lemon? Write a few lines about it, and share your experiences.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Use of polariser

Postby glamy on Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:00 am

Did that happen because I was pointing up? Sometimes I have a problem on the sides.
Image
Cheers,
Gerard
User avatar
glamy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X

Postby owen on Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:07 am

Hi mate. This happens because the wide angle of the lens is capturing the un-evenness in the sky. One of the things about using the polariser.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby glamy on Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:31 am

Thanks Owen,
How come that does not show the problem, it has been taken with the same lens.
Image
Cheers,
Gerard
User avatar
glamy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X

Postby owen on Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:36 am

Could be a number of reasons, the sky in the second one looks slightly overexposed; could be a different level of polarisation; the position of the sun could be different, etc...

a polariser works best pointing 90 degrees from the sun. I quite like the effect of the changing tones in some images,, but a lot of people don't.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:49 am

Angle along with the time of day (i.e. sun position) will affect a CPL. I have always found that a polariser is a hit and miss affair 8)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby stubbsy on Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:28 pm

Gerard

The effect in #1 is because you've rotated the polariser too far - once you get the hang of it you can see this in the viewfinder (the image gets VERY dark in the V in the middle). When you see this in the viewfinder you rotate the CP a touch and you're home & hosed. In the second shot you either (a) didn't rotate the CP quite so far, or the orientation relative to the sun was different. In other words you need to deal with both angle to the sun (90 deg being optimal) AND, in wide shots, back off a little with the polarisation to avoid the V effect.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby owen on Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:38 pm

Something I only learnt about a few months ago is that you'll notice a line on the rim of your polariser, if you rotate this to point in the direction of the sun then you'll get the maximum effect.
http://www.ausphotos.com - My Gallery

http://www.doesgodexist.com - a very interesting site.
User avatar
owen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1699
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 3:21 pm
Location: Nowra, NSW

Postby ozczecho on Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:44 pm

Great thread.

I just got my CPL and also have exp. the effect of #1. I always thought that the line on the CPL should match the white line on the lens :oops: doh.
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby daniel_r on Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:54 pm

ozczecho wrote:Great thread.

I just got my CPL and also have exp. the effect of #1. I always thought that the line on the CPL should match the white line on the lens :oops: doh.


As Owen mentioned, the white line or arrow on the rotating ring on most CPLs is supposed to be pointed in the direction of the sun (usually says so in the little paper slip that comes with the filter, as well as other info on how many stops it reduces and so on).

In image #2 it looks like the sun was in front and slightly above the field of view (from a guess).

The polarisation effect is minimised when the sun is infront or behind you, and maximised when pointing 90 deg away from the sun (or light source in other types of shots such as minimising reflection off glass)

Another thing to lookout for is if you're wearing polarised sunglasses, and using a CPL - you'll need to take off / look over the sunnies to get your CPL effect right. As Stubbsy said, the "V" in #1 is caused by overdoing the polarisation in wide angle shots - if you rotate the filter slowly, you'll see a dark band moving slowly across the frame.
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby ozczecho on Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:13 pm

daniel_r wrote:

<snip>
(usually says so in the little paper slip that comes with the filter, as well as other info on how many stops it reduces and so on).


No such beast in my packaging :(

Anyway, great info daniel_r, btw you mention a dark band moving across the frame. I have noticed that aswell and always thought it should be where the sky is. Is that right or is the CPL working when there is no dark band?

TIA

Mike
User avatar
ozczecho
Senior Member
 
Posts: 785
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2005 9:41 pm
Location: Beecroft, Sydney

Postby glamy on Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:31 pm

Thank you all for the infos. As my CPL is not graduated I thought the position did not really matter. I did notice the two marks on the filter after a while and I thought they were supposed to line up with the horizontal...':oops:
I discarded the notice in the box thinking it was useless like in the others. I tend to agree with Chris about the hit and miss affair. I wear glasses that darken in the sun, combined with the view finder of the D70 it makes it a bit hard...
User avatar
glamy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X

Postby daniel_r on Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:39 pm

ozczecho wrote:
No such beast in my packaging :(

Anyway, great info daniel_r, btw you mention a dark band moving across the frame. I have noticed that aswell and always thought it should be where the sky is. Is that right or is the CPL working when there is no dark band?

TIA

Mike


The dark band is actually the "V" you see in image #1, but it's less pronounced in the D70's viewfinder (because it's so small). Say you had a identical filter on say a 20mm lens, and a 105mm lens with the CPL rotated to the same position and focused on the same object in the middle of the frame. If the 20mm was showing the "V" in the middle of the frame, you probably wouldn't be able to see it with the 105 as it has a much narrower angle of view, and the the middle of the "V" is filling the frame.

The "V" mainly shows up with wide angle lenses as they capture such a large angle of view, and polarisation varies across a given scene in reference to where the sun is.

For example the angle of view of a 20mm lens on a 35mm body is 83 deg horizontal, while 105mm is 19 deg horizontal. Essentially with the 105 you're cropping (eeek, I hate using such a term but cant think of an alternative) down to the middle of the V.

What you're aiming for when figuring out where the CPL should be rotated to comes down to and/or:
* minimise the presence of the dark band (the "V") in the viewfinder in a scene that has a large amount of sky
* maximise the contrast / minimise the amount of reflection in glass or scenes with lots of foliage (leaves will go very green with a cut in the white washed-glare.

Good experiment for figuring out your CPL and how it works is car windscreens on sunny days.

Hopefully I've got all this right from memory, been a while since my physics days and wave properties of light (slit polarisation and wavelengths)
:lol:
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.

Postby Potatis on Thu Apr 13, 2006 4:05 pm

sirhc55 wrote:I have always found that a polariser is a hit and miss affair 8)


Me too! :) Like the rest of my photography. :lol:
Doug C.
Potatis
Senior Member
 
Posts: 512
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2005 11:04 am
Location: Mosman

Postby SteveGriffin on Thu Apr 13, 2006 5:00 pm

I think that this thread is the most educational thing that I have read on DSLR. Thankyou
Steve
-------------------------------------------------------
So many things to do - so little time.
User avatar
SteveGriffin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 815
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2005 6:52 pm
Location: Rochedale Brisbane

Postby glamy on Thu Apr 13, 2006 8:59 pm

Thank you very much for the info, I'd better practice!
Cheers,
Gerard
User avatar
glamy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X


Return to Equipment Reviews