Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page
Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
by Alpha_7 on Fri May 05, 2006 11:56 am
Just a quick post, I was wondering (as I've never done it before) if when you hire lenses there are restrictions on where you take them, as in.. essentially.
Can I hire lenses in Australia and take them to Fiji with me ? Kate said we might visit a place with heaps of orchids and gorgeous flowers, so I was wondering if it might be worth hiring a macro lens (...hmmm they do hire those types of lens right, not just big zooms and pro primes?)
The next question I guess if the answer is yes, what should I do about insurance (can I have it covered while I'm over there..?).
Sorry wanted this to be quick and painless and I've already asked to many questions. 
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by phillipb on Fri May 05, 2006 12:09 pm
Sorry Craig, I don't know the answers to your questions, but I get the feeling that by the time you consider all the costs involved (extended hire, insurance etc) you will be very close to the cost of a sigma 105 macro from birddog.
In any case I'm sure that if you were to buy one, use it and then sell it on the way back, it would definetly work out more cost effective.
__________ Phillip
**Nikon D7000**
-

phillipb
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 10:56 am
- Location: Milperra (Sydney) **Nikon D7000**
by Glen on Fri May 05, 2006 1:52 pm
Craig,
Borges charge $264 a week for a 18-35 f3.5-4.5 lens, a lens not too far off the price of a Sigma 105.
Either buy one or you can borrow mine.  Insurance is simple, if you damage it in any way (or take a topless self portrait with it, that is classed as physchological damage  ), you order me a new one from Birdy.
When do you go?
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Marty on Fri May 05, 2006 1:54 pm
Hey Craig, like PhilpB says, the cost adds up very quickly if you want to hire for extended time, at it might be more cost effective to buy a lens.
Unless you are hiring a $10k plus lens...
These guys are good for hiring.
http://lapfoto.com.au/
Give them a call and they will tell you about insurance, etc.
Cheers
Marty
What does that button do....??
-

Marty
- Member
-
- Posts: 436
- Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 7:54 pm
- Location: Queenscliff, Nth Beaches, Sydney
by Alpha_7 on Fri May 05, 2006 1:55 pm
21st of May for 5 or 6 days, I've done some digging hiring isn't a cost effective method at all  When you consider hiring a lens for a week, or owning it for life, the sums just don't add up in the favour of hiring. (other then lower intial outlay).
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by Glen on Fri May 05, 2006 1:58 pm
Craig, my offer still stands. You can borrow mine.
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by birddog114 on Fri May 05, 2006 1:59 pm
My opinion on hiring a small lens.
Most of rental places don't have the small lens and they only hire out the pro glass as 70-200VR, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600. They're not cheap after all costing + insurance etc...
Loan from members on this forum is another alternative but there's a risk if something happens, then you have to keep the damaged unit and force out few hundred bucks to buy a new replacement.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by birddog114 on Fri May 05, 2006 2:00 pm
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
-

birddog114
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 15881
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
- Location: Belmore,Sydney
by losfp on Fri May 05, 2006 2:34 pm
Definitely not worth it for non-pro lenses (hell, I don't particularly think it's really worth it for pro glass either, unless someone else is paying for it).
If you're after quick and dirty solutions, perhaps consider close-up lenses or those extension tube thingies? I do not have extensive experience with them though, so I can't say if THEY are worth it either. 
-

losfp
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1572
- Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
- Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney
-
by Glen on Fri May 05, 2006 2:47 pm
Craig, I also have a manual Tamron SP 35-80 f2.8 -3.8 which has macro capability if you are worried about damaging the Sigma. Not as easy to use as the Sigma but if you damage it you can give me the $70 it is worth 
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by padey on Fri May 05, 2006 2:53 pm
If you want, you can borrow my Nikkor 35-70mm f/2.8 AF-D. It's got a marco switch at 35mm and f2.8 thoughout the range. Best of both worlds.
If you're looking for 1:1macro, i'll throw in some extension tubes.
FYI - http://www.camerahobby.com/Review-35-70mm.htm
Andrew
Canon make photocopiers and stick lenses on them....
-
padey
- Member
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 2:23 pm
- Location: Sydney, Hills Area
by Glen on Fri May 05, 2006 3:03 pm
Andrew, I will raise you a 70-200 VR with 500d Diopter!  No, only joking, very generous of you. Craig, you have 3 good choices now, Andrew's being most adapatable as it replaces a std lens. The Sigma is a great macro, the Tamron is cheap so no risk. Good luck in your choice.
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Mj on Fri May 05, 2006 3:06 pm
Some other options to consider...
extension tubes... about $250.
close up diopter... about $150.
close up filters..... about $100.
All cheap n cheerful and can do the job at a pinch and with a little patience.
-

Mj
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1048
- Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
- Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}
by Alpha_7 on Fri May 05, 2006 5:07 pm
Thanks everyone, I really appreciate the generous offers.
PMs sent!
-

Alpha_7
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 7259
- Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
- Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9
-
by gstark on Fri May 05, 2006 6:00 pm
Glen wrote:Craig, I also have a manual Tamron SP 35-80 f2.8 -3.8 which has macro capability if you are worried about damaging the Sigma. Not as easy to use as the Sigma but if you damage it you can give me the $70 it is worth 
Still worth more than the Sigma!

g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by Glen on Fri May 05, 2006 6:06 pm
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
Return to Absolute Beginners Questions
|