2 more 12-24mm shots

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

2 more 12-24mm shots

Postby sirhc55 on Fri Jan 07, 2005 4:42 pm

The mustang was so shiny that I can be seen in the reflection and the other was shot for one of our revered forum members:

Image

Image

Chris PS 1st shot 12mm and the 2nd 24mm
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Glen on Fri Jan 07, 2005 4:49 pm

Nice shots Chris, doesnt seem much distortion at the wide end (joking as if I could tell in that shot) must be because you made the same call as me on the 12-24 front.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Very nice!

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:22 pm

Hi Chris
These shots seem particularly sharp - well done!

There is no shortage of quality in your Sigma 12-24, as demonstrated in this and your other posts.

Speaking of W/A photography generally (not lenses specifically) do you find that you almost need a different mind-set using W/A lenses?

Maybe it's just me, but I have always felt that I have to get into W/A mode. Today, for example, I went out with just my D70 & the 12-24. No camera bag. In fact, I had to buy the CPF at a camera store just before using it.

I find that if I have W/A lens just as part of my kit, I don't seem to find many W/A opportunities. Obviously, the photo ops don't simply disappear - it is all in attitude.

I love unusual perspective shots - that's why I find W/A so appealing - but I can't say that it comes naturally to me.

What are the thoughts of other photographers here?
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Re: Very nice!

Postby sirhc55 on Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:33 pm

cricketfan wrote:Hi Chris
These shots seem particularly sharp - well done!

There is no shortage of quality in your Sigma 12-24, as demonstrated in this and your other posts.

Speaking of W/A photography generally (not lenses specifically) do you find that you almost need a different mind-set using W/A lenses?

Maybe it's just me, but I have always felt that I have to get into W/A mode. Today, for example, I went out with just my D70 & the 12-24. No camera bag. In fact, I had to buy the CPF at a camera store just before using it.

I find that if I have W/A lens just as part of my kit, I don't seem to find many W/A opportunities. Obviously, the photo ops don't simply disappear - it is all in attitude.

I love unusual perspective shots - that's why I find W/A so appealing - but I can't say that it comes naturally to me.

What are the thoughts of other photographers here?


Absolutely spot on with your assessment cricketfan - I just love the opportunites that WA gives - I look at everything as a different perspective with this lens and the lens has only come off the camera in the past week to do work pics.

You only have to look thru the viewfinder to see another world and this weekend coming I am going to try and get some more abstracts.

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Glen on Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:38 pm

Cricketfan, I know what you mean. When I had a 20mm (still do, just looks 30mm) I would mainly use it for landscapes and otherwise only occasionaly pull it out of the bag. Your mindset idea is spot on, I am taking the 12-24 to Thailand and intend to spend whole days with it. Your shots from this morning look great.

Re the two lenses, I think they are both compromises either side of a fence, just depends which side of the fence you spend more time on. Mine was easy, I take property shots so less distortion is better. Not so easy for others making the choice
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Horses for courses (now there's a cliche!)

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:44 pm

Glen wrote:Cricketfan, I know what you mean. When I had a 20mm (still do, just looks 30mm) I would mainly use it for landscapes and otherwise only occasionaly pull it out of the bag. Your mindset idea is spot on, I am taking the 12-24 to Thailand and intend to spend whole days with it. Your shots from this morning look great.

Re the two lenses, I think they are both compromises either side of a fence, just depends which side of the fence you spend more time on. Mine was easy, I take property shots so less distortion is better. Not so easy for others making the choice


Thanks Glen.

Yes, you are right. Most of my W/A shots are landscapes - a bit of distortion is not usually too much of a prob. I also wanted to make sure that I could mount a CPF, so that confirmed Nikon for me.
But the quality of the shots I've seen (on this and other sites) from the Sigma can't be denied IMHO.

Cheers
Trevor
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Raydar on Fri Jan 07, 2005 5:57 pm

Nice shots Chris :wink:

The last one I like, I spend half my life sitting in one of them & enjoy every minute of it :mrgreen:

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

Postby sirhc55 on Fri Jan 07, 2005 6:06 pm

Raydar wrote:Nice shots Chris :wink:

The last one I like, I spend half my life sitting in one of them & enjoy every minute of it :mrgreen:

Cheers
Ray :P


Shot just for you :wink:

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques