Canon 50mm 1.4 vs 1.8

Had a play with something interesting? Got something that we all covet? Found a real lemon? Write a few lines about it, and share your experiences.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Canon 50mm 1.4 vs 1.8

Postby kenny12 on Thu May 11, 2006 3:57 pm

just a few quick shots,

Image
1.8 mk II

Image
1.4

EXIF should be intact both shot wide open

EDIT- Outdoor shots both at 1.8 both shots were taken within seconds of each other.

Image
1.8

Image
1.4
User avatar
kenny12
Member
 
Posts: 136
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2005 8:15 pm
Location: Padstow, Sydney

Postby Trieu on Thu May 11, 2006 4:28 pm

Nice one! I like the bottom one of each.. but I might be abit biased as I am picking up my 50mm f1.4 in a few hours..
Cheers,
Trieu
30D and TWO L's
User avatar
Trieu
Member
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Sydney's West Canon 30D

Postby Laurie on Sun May 14, 2006 12:59 pm

where did you get that model from???
i want one :P

nice shots.
the bokeh in #3 (1st pic 2nd group) looks whack!
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby moz on Sun May 14, 2006 3:57 pm

Trieu wrote:Nice one! I like the bottom one of each.. but I might be abit biased as I am picking up my 50mm f1.4 in a few hours..


Nah, after he'd tried my 1.4 last night Johnno refused to get his 1.8 out for comparison. I suspect it would be an expensive experiment :)
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
User avatar
moz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Coburg, Melbun.

Postby Trieu on Sun May 14, 2006 4:56 pm

Been playing around with my new f1.4 and it so fast. Will be posting some pics up very very soon...

This lens is a keeper!
Cheers,
Trieu
30D and TWO L's
User avatar
Trieu
Member
 
Posts: 351
Joined: Sun Apr 02, 2006 2:36 pm
Location: Sydney's West Canon 30D

Postby stubbsy on Sun May 14, 2006 5:46 pm

WHat strikes me about both pairs of images is the nicer, creamier bokeh in the two 1.4 shots.

I'm looking forward to Trieu's shots with the 1.4 from Vesak day since the few I saw on the camera preview looked damn good.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby dreams on Fri May 19, 2006 4:17 pm

maybe my eyes is not trained for this.
anyone want to point out the spots that are different to each other?

i still cant think of the price jump between the two
dreams
Member
 
Posts: 74
Joined: Sun Sep 11, 2005 2:20 pm
Location: Adelaide

Postby ozonejunkie on Fri May 19, 2006 11:59 pm

dreams wrote:maybe my eyes is not trained for this.
anyone want to point out the spots that are different to each other?

i still cant think of the price jump between the two


IMHO - I don't believe there is THAT much difference. However, the most noticeable difference between lenses is the bokeh (the out of focus point bits). On the 1.8 they are much harsher then on the 1.4, this makes for a much nice OOF background in shots. If you notice the background on the 1.4 is much smoother, and the point sources of light are smoother, then on the 1.8.

Having said that, I love the 1.8. :)
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D

Postby anubis on Sat May 20, 2006 10:52 am

I agree there is not much difference, but the Bokeh on the 1.4 to me looks nicer....whats the price difference between the lenses guys?
Nikon D300, Nikkors 70-200 VR, 17-55, 50 1.4,18-200 VR etc
User avatar
anubis
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Rose Bay

Postby ozonejunkie on Sat May 20, 2006 10:31 pm

RRP Difference: $570
HK Price Diff: ~$330

That is the reason I chose the 1.8. :)

Tristan
User avatar
ozonejunkie
Member
 
Posts: 353
Joined: Sat May 28, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: ANU, Canberra - EOS 30D

Depth of field

Postby Justin on Sat May 27, 2006 10:42 pm

Look at the hand of the wooden doll in the top two shots - it is blurrier in the bottom shot, the wider aperture 1.4 gives you a narrower depth of field.

I've got a Nikon 50 1.4 and it can get ridiculously narrow if you are shooting wide open and close to focus, down to a centimetre or so
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny


Return to Equipment Reviews