Suggestions calibrating monitor

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Suggestions calibrating monitor

Postby Spooky on Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:28 pm

Hello all

I have previously calibrated my CRT monitor by eye comparing results of my prints to what I see on the screen.

When I got my last lot of prints done the prints have a dirty brown tinge in the greens which is quite unattractive and the pinks are a bit subdued.

Using the kelvin temperature and the R G B controls I tried to adjust the monitor to reflect as closely as possible to the prints so next time I print I will get closer to what I see on the screen, however despite fiddling for quite a while I can't even get close to reproducing the brown tinge in the greens.

Any advice?
User avatar
Spooky
Member
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:19 am
Location: Brisbane

Postby big pix on Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:31 pm

you will have to buy a Spyder or Eye One.......
Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby leek on Thu Apr 27, 2006 10:35 pm

While automatic calibration might be the answer, remember that while you can be responsible for your own monitor's calibration, you can't be responsible for or control the printer's equipment... The only way to control the calibration of the whole process is to print yourself... Sorry if that was obvious, but it sounded as if you were getting your prints done externally...
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Spooky on Thu Apr 27, 2006 11:04 pm

Hi Big Pix, I was trying to get away without having to purchase a spyder or similar device.

Yes Leek, I get them done at a lab, in the past haven't had problems, thought my monitor might have drifted out over the past few months since I had prints done last.
User avatar
Spooky
Member
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:19 am
Location: Brisbane

Postby MattC on Fri Apr 28, 2006 3:46 am

Spooky, you will always struggle without decent calibration.

Cheers
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby losfp on Fri Apr 28, 2006 8:15 am

IMO it's really quite difficult to get colours done accurately by eye. OS X has semi-decent calibration software built-in, so I've managed to get by until now, but I still want to get a spyder (or similar), as you can never get it exactly right.
User avatar
losfp
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1572
Joined: Thu Nov 17, 2005 12:45 pm
Location: Quakers Hill, Sydney

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri Apr 28, 2006 9:55 am

If you don't wish to buy a Spyder, an alternative would be to use Adobe Gamma, which will do a calibration based on visual feedback from you.

If you have Photoshop or Elements it is included.
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Spooky on Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:14 pm

I took the shots into the lab this morning to ask them. They say they have seen the issue before and suggested it might be something to do with the camera capturing some green tones in the yellow channel.

Suggested I boost the saturation in the yellow channel in photoshop.

I am going to do a few small images with some adjustments at different levels, get them printed and see what happens.
User avatar
Spooky
Member
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:19 am
Location: Brisbane

Postby JordanP on Fri Apr 28, 2006 5:29 pm

The lab you are working with could be the problem - I wouldn't rule that out. When they print your images are they printing 'as is' or are they applying either automatic or manual corrections as deemed by the printer (person not the machine)?

What do they do, or guarantee regarding their printer (machine not the person) calibration? Labs can change or not monitor their own calibration at any time.

I will not use the local labs in my area (not much to choose from anyway) as they are too inconsistant or just plain off the mark in terms of their equipment.

However I do support the above posts about the importance of calibration.

I would be very surprised if it was your camera and suspicious that the lab suggested that was the problem. If your shots look OK on your monitor then the monitor must have shifted out of calibration the same way your camera apparently has.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby Spooky on Thu May 11, 2006 8:48 pm

I went back to the lab today and the lady suggested I boost the hue in the yellow channel. She says it is a common problem with green because the camera tends to interpret some greens as having too much yellow.

Tried it out on the image and if I go negative about 10 on the hue in the yellow channel my screen image does look like the print.

I imagine if I go plus 10 on the hue in the yellow channel I would get a print near to what the screen shows.

Seems a bit of a pain. I can't adjust my monitor to compensate.


On another point the labs printers need the files in RGB mode and in 8bit. I thought by converting to 8bit you are throwing a large amount of the possible colour variations out.

What to the labs everyone else uses require. Do they print in 16 bit?
User avatar
Spooky
Member
 
Posts: 293
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2005 11:19 am
Location: Brisbane

Postby stubbsy on Thu May 11, 2006 9:46 pm

Adjusting the monitor to match THEIR printer seems a poor solution. If the colour looks right on screen, but comes out wrong and your monitor is calibrated I'd question the calibration at the mini lab. They can just as easily adjust the yellow at their end and you still see true colours when doing PP.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby daniel_r on Thu May 11, 2006 10:17 pm

I'm with Stubbsy on this one.

A couple of things I'd suggest from experience:
* calibrate your display(s) the best you can using perceptual calibration tools such as Adobe Gamma (win) or ColorSync (Mac).

* do the calibration in a low light environment, be careful not to have any strong influential ambient light (ie strong incandescent or fluorescent) sources nearby

* have someone else co-calibrate the display with you at the same time (you may have mild colour blindness and not know it - 1 in 12 males are colour blind to some degree, rare in females due to colour blindness being a recessive genetic trait)

* make your own crappy pantone system (more perceptual calibration, still error prone) - rummage around in your desk and find some coloured Post-it-notes. Hold them up to your screen, open Photoshop, create a new sRGB document 400x400 px and using the colour picker see if you can bucket fill the the square image with the same colour. Repeat for a variety of different coloured post-it notes (or other coloured paper). Save your files, take them and your post-it notes to a mates/work computer with a calibratred display, open the files and compare with your Post-it collection :)

Now to check your prints:

Now with your freshly calibrated display, prepare a 10 image collection of vastly differing styles/colour images (strong yellows, blue, greens, reds and some with graduated midtones) and post process them to your tastes on your display. Save them out as sRGB 8-bit JPEGs.

Take your CD/whatever to a number of different labs, and print all 10 images at each lab (say they're 30c each, that's only $3). See if you can get them printed all on the same finish paper (gloss/matt).

Take them home and do a comparison with the different labs. You'll be surprised. Hint: BigW is prints are so laughable they make you want to cry :) (I got some printed there for entertainment purposes)

edit: found it! A colour blindness page loader http://colorfilter.wickline.org/
D.
Daniel_R's Flickr gallery
I shoot with Nikon stuff.
User avatar
daniel_r
Senior Member
 
Posts: 749
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2005 1:58 pm
Location: Canberra, ACT.


Return to General Discussion