my first wedding shoot

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

my first wedding shoot

Postby ajo43 on Sun Jan 09, 2005 9:09 am

Sorry I can't give you lots of nice pictures of the bride and groom but I didn't get their permission to put shots on the web.

Image

Weddings are hard. I learned heaps by watching the professional photographer. A couple of interesting things he did:

- used angles heaps. He always tried to get a different perspective on a shot by crouching, holding the camera above his head etc. Ie, anything but normal eyesight
- used a quite long zoom for many shots (I'm not sure what it was but it looked to be up to 200 or 300mm (there is a shot of the camera below so some of you may be able to tell me)
- he was running around like a mad man - in front, behind etc etc
- took film, not digital (not sure why - he was a photo journalist - maybe that was a personal preference of his or the bride and groom asked).

Here is one of the cameras he used (Canon EOS1 with 28-70)


Image

This is the other camera he had (can anyone identify the lens)


Image

The photographer in action:

Image

In the picture you can see another guy squatting down taking photos. I sat opposite him at dinner and it turns out he is a fashion photographer. Shoots for Vogue and all the top mags (has done Elle, Claudia etc). Does Beckham's shots. He was using a little tiny Contax film P&S.

Mental note to self - good photographers crouch down lots.
Regards

Jonesy
User avatar
ajo43
Member
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 1:55 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby atencati on Sun Jan 09, 2005 10:05 am

Well done ajo. When I shoot people I like to crouch to show more sky and or natural scenery. I don't care for shots of people, couples, etc in front of buildings, signs, roads, doesn't seem intimate. It also lends the feeling of confidence to the subjects to look slightly down at the camera. Conversely, children shot from above looking slightly up tends to show their vulnerablility and youtfulness. Eye level isn't always the most appealing shot. Would love to see the comparison between your shots and the "pros"

Andy
D70, 70-200VR, 18-70, 50 1.8, SB800
Blackberry PIN: 2029497E
User avatar
atencati
Member
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:37 pm
Location: Sacramento, California, USA -D70

Postby ajo43 on Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:14 pm

If I can get some of the pro shots then I'll certainly put them on the web to compare.

One more thing that I learned about my D70. WB Shady gave me the nicest skintones. WB Cloudy was OK. WB Auto was too green. The day was kind of overcast with patchy clouds and sun so hard to choose the correct setting.

I'm a JPEG shooter so not as much ability to correct WB afterwards (I find NEF too slow and too much PP).
Regards

Jonesy
User avatar
ajo43
Member
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 1:55 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Mj on Sun Jan 09, 2005 12:46 pm

Just for your info, that lens is most likely the Canon 70-200L.
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}


Return to General Discussion