77mm Polariser for Sigma 10-20Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
77mm Polariser for Sigma 10-20What are your suggestions as to Polariser filter to suit my new toy ?
I asked Zeeke this question and he said to just wear sunglasses or squint. UV UV HMC Multi-coated - Super HMC Pro 1 UV Circular Polariser - Super Pro 1 Circular Polariser Others that I have missed? LOZ
the super hmc pro 1 version has the added benefit of not giving you a brownish representation of the polarized effect in the viewfinder
check if this version has a filter thread as rthe cheaper ones dont and you have to use a crappy rubber lens cap that smudges the glass when used the nikon version does the same thing but costs much much more
I have a B&W circular polariser (two actually: one slim and one normal). I had problem with a Pro1 Hoya and won't buy them again. The B&W have brass thread that does not bind like aluminium. On the slim one there is no thread in the front. Very well made...
Cheers, Gerard
Perhaps you bought a cheap version or factory second, they are all excellent filters. Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Laurie,
I think a lenscap would probably work quite well. Seriously, the viewing angle of the lens is greater than what a CPL can really address with any real effect, and thus you will see some parts of the image showing evidence of the CPL, while other parts will not, thus leading to a potentially unsatisfactory image. If the lens has provision for an internal filter, as some Nikkors do, that might be a potential solution - but I don't think I've seen an instance of using a CPL internally - but otherwise, I think that you're stuck. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
I have a slim B+W CPL for my Tokina 12-24, it's a good filter.. But Gary is right, you often get weird effects on ultra-wide lenses.
Barrie, Do you mean how much did they give him to take the lens off their hands? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
So he got the lens + money as payment for removalist Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Hey, im staying out of this conversation.. Ive been blamed already
Tim D70 - D200/MBD200 Coming soon - Too Much Gear, Not Enough Talent
My Site: http://www.digitalstill.net My Fishing Site: http://www.fishseq.com
Yep. Probably comes with a black plastic bag as well. For permanent, off-site storage. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
I have tested a CPL on my 10-20 and it is IMHO a waste of money. The lens does such a good job on skys, clouds etc that you really don't see any benefit and as others have stated it can be difficult to get an even spread.
Cheers
Mark http://www.photographicaustralia.com http://www.trekaboutphotography.com He who dies with the most lenses wins...
If in doubt, blame Tim I use a simple fotar CPL it works well. I like the effect it gives me. Way to much photography gear is never enough!
Previous topic • Next topic
19 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|