Canon signals that film's day are numbered

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Canon signals that film's day are numbered

Postby Greg B on Fri May 26, 2006 1:19 pm

Article here
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby sirhc55 on Fri May 26, 2006 1:36 pm

I read this earlier Greg and was amused that they changed from will to consider 8)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Nnnnsic on Fri May 26, 2006 2:04 pm

There was a similar talk recently about photography in the art world being in some serious trouble now that anyone and everyone can pick up a camera, maybe Photoshop it a little, and then claim it as art, and as such you have a whole ton of people claiming they're artists by shoving out a whole bunch of crap and leaving those that really do try to make art in the Photographic world

This is just another gunshot because as film moves out of the marketplace, people will find that less effort really needs to go into an image before it has to be considered art.

Then again, it's not just the fault of the people bludging it to have their work considered art.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby birddog114 on Fri May 26, 2006 2:05 pm

Not surprise at all, either now or later.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby leek on Fri May 26, 2006 8:21 pm

"Film's day are numbered" :!: :!: :!:
Greg :cry: :cry: :cry: Surely you didn't mean to write that :!: :!: :!:
Oh and by the way... I'm surprised that you haven't asked the admins to remove the superfluous comma and apostrophe in the forum's site description yet... :lol:

DSLRUsers.com -- News, reviews, and forums for the users of Digital SLR's

:twisted: :twisted: :twisted: :roll:
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby Steffen on Sat May 27, 2006 12:31 am

leek wrote:Oh and by the way... I'm surprised that you haven't asked the admins to remove the superfluous comma and apostrophe in the forum's site description yet... :lol:

DSLRUsers.com -- News, reviews, and forums for the users of Digital SLR's


I thought the apostrophe tick-mark that would appear to be seemingly redundant may be used when forming plurals of three-letter TLA's (and other capitalised acronyms in all upper-case letters), as per explicitly allowed permission.

But then, I'm just a foreigner from abroad, what do I know?

Cheers
Steffen.
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby leek on Sat May 27, 2006 8:01 am

Steffen wrote:I thought the apostrophe tick-mark that would appear to be seemingly redundant may be used when forming plurals of three-letter TLA's (and other capitalised acronyms in all upper-case letters), as per explicitly allowed permission.


Err... No... In the same way that the signs that you see promoting Pizza's and half price banana's are also incorrect... :lol:
Cheers, John
Leek@Flickr | Leek@RedBubble | Leek@DeviantArt

D700; D200; Tokina 12-24; Nikkor 50mm f1.4,18-70mm,85mm f1.8, 105mm,80-400VR, SB-800s; G1227LVL; RRS BH-55; Feisol 1401
User avatar
leek
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3135
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Lane Cove, Sydney

Postby DionM on Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:12 am

Nnnnsic wrote:claim it as art, and as such you have a whole ton of people claiming they're artists by shoving out a whole bunch of crap and leaving those that really do try to make art in the Photographic world


I daresay there are plenty of people out there who think that so-called 'artists' turn out plenty of crap as it is, so what's a bit more :wink:

Canon 20D and a bunch of lovely L glass and a 580EX. Benro tripod. Manfrotto monopod. Lowepro and Crumpler bags. And a pair of Sigma teleconverters, and some Kenko tubes.
http://www.dionm.net/
DionM
Senior Member
 
Posts: 898
Joined: Mon Aug 22, 2005 10:11 pm
Location: Holland Park, Brisbane

Postby Hlop on Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:29 am

Despite all these talks, while air and space espionage exists, B&W emulsions will be on the market. Colour films could be gone but B&Ws will last much longer. Chemicals won't be a problem too 'cause you can always mix your own and there are plenty of recipes and great flexibility
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby macka on Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:41 am

Nnnnsic wrote:There was a similar talk recently about photography in the art world being in some serious trouble now that anyone and everyone can pick up a camera, maybe Photoshop it a little, and then claim it as art, and as such you have a whole ton of people claiming they're artists by shoving out a whole bunch of crap and leaving those that really do try to make art in the Photographic world


It used to be much harder to get literature published as well. Now, practically anyone can do it - you can even self-publish if you have the money for it.

You can see this as a good thing in that literature has been democratised - more people have the oppportunity to express themselves through writing, and they have a better chance of getting published.

You can also take the view that is taken by most academics in the field, who no longer have a monopoly over literature as an art form, that the standard of literature is being lowered, and thus, literature as art is threatened.

It's a matter of who you think should have the power and authority to determine what is art - the masses or the intellectuals. :wink:

Personally, I do think there is more total shit being published, but I can't deny its popularity. Also, I don't think that the academics in the field are ever going to give up pushing their own views about what is great literature, the real change is that now this kind of critique is confined to academic circles, one of the biggest complaints of whom is of the low standard of what everyone else is reading.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby rmp on Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:50 am

Film is effectively dead. Debate over. Sure, there may be one or two niche markets for it in the same way I'm sure you can still buy vinyl records from somewhere, but it's dead.

I don't know any pro action photogs who use film. I don't know anyone who has bought a new film camera in the last few years.

Some time soon we'll be calling DSLRs "SLRs" and film SLRs "FSLRs".

I agree with Dion that a lot of "art" isn't really what many would term art, so what does a bit more rubbish matter. BTW an apostrophe is never used for plurals of words like pizzas, Australians, Toyotas and bananas. Modern usage is also that it is not used for acronyms like DLSRs or PCs either.

Steffen, in my experience those learning English as a second language often have a better grasp of these matters than native speakers. This is because the natives learn by osmosis which is unfortunately often incorrect, and speech where spelling isn't a problem, whereas the students who study learn the correct rules.
--
Robert
rmp
Member
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:29 pm
Location: Western side of Melbourne

Postby gstark on Mon Jun 05, 2006 9:54 am

macka wrote:You can see this as a good thing in that literature has been democratised - more people have the oppportunity to express themselves through writing, and they have a better chance of getting published.


Yes.

Although more people still need to learn how to speak and write correctly in theie chosen language.

Including (perhaps especially?) those who self publish. :)

No, I'm being cruel. I see far too many examples of piss poor journalism to simply say this applies mainly to those who self publish.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby macka on Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:10 am

gstark wrote:Although more people still need to learn how to speak and write correctly in theie chosen language.


Was that on purpose, Gary? :wink:

I agree, though, there are two sides of the coin.
Cheers,

macka
a.k.a. Kris
User avatar
macka
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1092
Joined: Sat Dec 31, 2005 4:18 pm
Location: North Rocks, Sydney

Postby Sheila Smart on Mon Jun 05, 2006 12:08 pm

Which reminds me, what happened to Wally? :)

Cheers
Sheila
Sheila Smart
Canon 5D and various Ls
Black and White Spider Award 2005 - Photographer of the Year - amateur
On-line Gallery here
Sheila Smart
Member
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:20 am
Location: Avalon Beach, NSW

Postby Hlop on Mon Jun 05, 2006 1:44 pm

rmp wrote:Film is effectively dead. Debate over.


I'm just wondering if you have attended to the funerals ... You sound too sure :)
Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
User avatar
Hlop
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1355
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 9:27 am
Location: Singapore

Postby Nnnnsic on Mon Jun 05, 2006 6:07 pm

rmp wrote:Film is effectively dead. Debate over.


They say Elvis is dead too, but he's probably sitting in an old Cadillac outside your home with an F5 and a 500mm lens taking pictures of you on film right now...
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby rmp on Mon Jun 05, 2006 8:09 pm

Hlop wrote:
rmp wrote:Film is effectively dead. Debate over.


I'm just wondering if you have attended to the funerals ... You sound too sure :)


Of course I'd sound sure if quoted out of context :-)
--
Robert
rmp
Member
 
Posts: 161
Joined: Mon Mar 27, 2006 8:29 pm
Location: Western side of Melbourne

Postby wally on Mon Jun 05, 2006 10:01 pm

well I just burried my Kodak Ekkychrome boxes down the backyard.

film dead, Kodak dead, Agfa dead, Minolta dead.

now i'm using all digitall cameras, lenses and fillum so no-one can say that i'm a techno-cretin.
Where am I
User avatar
wally
Member
 
Posts: 91
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2005 11:44 am
Location: Adelaide


Return to General Discussion