To sell or not to sell??

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

To sell or not to sell??

Postby Werewolf on Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:53 am

As of today I'm the lucky owner of the 24-120VR (thanks to Birddog). Now this along with other recent lens purchases will render my 18-70 kit lens and 28-200G redundant. I hate to let good Nikon glass go but in order to help finance my next aquisition, a 12-24, should I sell 'em?? :? Would YOU sell 'em?

Secondly, would any forum members be interested in buying IF I can bring myself to let them go?

Decisions, decisions :roll: :roll:
Wollongong Wolves, Manchester City, Newcastle Utd. D70 Freak!
User avatar
Werewolf
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:59 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby MHD on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:03 am

dont sell the kit...
1) you would be missing 18-24
2) you would not get a price that is worth it
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:07 am

I’ll go with MHD on this one Werewolf - the kit lens will always come in handy at some point in time.

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby bwhinnen on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:13 am

Depending on what you ask for the kit price someone with a early Harvey Normal kit would probably buy it...

Cheers
Brett
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby atencati on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:40 am

I agree to keep the kit lens. You may decide on a 2n'd body at some time and need another lens, and they are getting pretty plentiful on E-Bay unfortunately. The 28-200 you could probabl get fair price for, but do you have a lens above the 120vr??

Andy
D70, 70-200VR, 18-70, 50 1.8, SB800
Blackberry PIN: 2029497E
User avatar
atencati
Member
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:37 pm
Location: Sacramento, California, USA -D70

Postby Werewolf on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:50 am

Andy - yes I have the wonderful Nikon 80-200 2.8ED and a Sigma 70-300APO11 Macro. So they cover THAT range and I will be getting my hands on a 80-400VR later this year.

I appreciate what you're all saying re the kit lens, but if I have:

12-24
24-120
70-300
80-200

surely the 18-70 is covered amongst those focal ranges??

Aaaarrgghhh :!:
Wollongong Wolves, Manchester City, Newcastle Utd. D70 Freak!
User avatar
Werewolf
Member
 
Posts: 118
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 9:59 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby JordanP on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:53 am

I'm trying to make the same decision myself and I dont have the same coverage as you - I would end up with gaps .... but I jst never use the lens anymore.

Might wait another few months and see if I use it......
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby xerubus on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:57 am

what's the image quality of the kit lens? what's it's widest ap? (i know i could look on the web.. but i'm a little crook today and feel a little lazy)

if it's okay perhaps i could use it for an interim portrait lens? maybe find someone to swap the sigma 28-300 for a kit lens?
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby MHD on Thu Jan 13, 2005 10:57 am

ok... I didnt know you had the 12-24 (boy your collection is growing fast...)
hmm...

Craig... I'm not suprised yo dont use the kit! With that lovely 17-55/2.8 :)
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby JordanP on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:03 am

Xerubus, Kit lens is 3.5 - 4.5. What is the sigma ??
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby gstark on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:09 am

JordanP wrote:I'm trying to make the same decision myself and I dont have the same coverage as you - I would end up with gaps .... but I jst never use the lens anymore.

Might wait another few months and see if I use it......


I have exactly the same issue, and no (as yet) 12-24.

But in selling the kit lens (we have two, in fact) I doubt I would realise its real value in a sale, thus making the transaction less than a financial success.

It's like my museum of laptop computers; they're all working, serviceable, usable, and very slow and very obsolete. If you sell them, you'll get a pittance, which is simply not worth my while; it's better to keep them in retirement, sitting in their cute little rocking-docks next to the Apples.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby xerubus on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:09 am

3.5-6.3

great lens for macro and landscape/wildlife, but not the best for weddings....
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby gstark on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:10 am

JordanP wrote:Xerubus, Kit lens is 3.5 - 4.5. What is the sigma ??


Opaque ?

:twisted:
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby JordanP on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:14 am

I was wondering how long it would take you to respond Gary (hehehe) - is that your Nikorr badge on your sleeve :)
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby gstark on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:17 am

Craig,

Today is my "be nice to other brands" day.

Hey, I might even say something nice about Telstra.

But of course, you know I'd never tell a lie ...
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby JordanP on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:18 am

gstark wrote:
But of course, you know I'd never tell a lie ...


That's a relief
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby JordanP on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:20 am

xerubus wrote:what's the image quality of the kit lens?


Opps I forgot to aswer this bit.

Quality is great - just not as good as the 17-55 2.8
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby Greg B on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:27 am

Werewolf wrote:Andy - yes I have the wonderful Nikon 80-200 2.8ED and a Sigma 70-300APO11 Macro. So they cover THAT range and I will be getting my hands on a 80-400VR later this year.

I appreciate what you're all saying re the kit lens, but if I have:

12-24
24-120
70-300
80-200

surely the 18-70 is covered amongst those focal ranges??

Aaaarrgghhh :!:


I wouldn't sell it either, but it is up to you WW. :)

If you ever decide to sell the d70 (shock, gasp), it would be a lot easier with the kit lens. How much would you get for the kit lens anyway?
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby xerubus on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:27 am

my apologies... i did not want to hijack this thread... one last question if i may :)

what is the quality of that lens wide open? is it sharp? would you consider it sharp enough for paid shots?
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby nigels on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:33 am

Hi,

Looks like a few of us are in that boat, I just ordered my 24-120VR off Birddog yesterday. I also was wondering about the kit lens as I hope to purchase the Sigma or Nikkor 12-24 early this year.

Think I will keep it though, as it is a nice lens and does have a good range. Then again if someone on Ebay offered me $500 I would have to think about it.

Nige
User avatar
nigels
The Joker
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 5:17 pm
Location: Bathurst NSW D70 and Love it

Postby nigels on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:34 am

Hi,

Looks like a few of us are in that boat, I just ordered my 24-120VR off Birddog yesterday. I also was wondering about the kit lens as I hope to purchase the Sigma or Nikkor 12-24 early this year.

Think I will keep it though, as it is a nice lens and does have a good range. Then again if someone on Ebay offered me $500 I would have to think about it.

Nige
User avatar
nigels
The Joker
 
Posts: 138
Joined: Sun Nov 21, 2004 5:17 pm
Location: Bathurst NSW D70 and Love it

Postby Onyx on Thu Jan 13, 2005 12:00 pm

Werewolf, the kit lens is definitely a keeper. You won't realise its true worth if you sell, and it is a fantastic piece of glass! They can be bought new at ECS for $295, so I'm not sure where the second hand market will price it at (it's worth so much more than that IMHO).

xerubus wrote:what is the quality of that lens wide open? is it sharp? would you consider it sharp enough for paid shots?

Xerubus, I find the kit lens is fantastic used wide open. In fact, my subjective tests have me convinced that at the 70mm end, between wide open at f/8 there's negligible difference in sharpness. Sharpness is surprisingly great IMO. It controls chromatic abberations very well too. The only downside is it's f/4.5 at the long end, which isn't all that fast compared to primes or f/2.8 pro zooms (but compared to the 24-120 is even slower).

It also has fantastic bokeh, and working with the right distances (70mm is not that long), it can be pressed into service as portrait lens if you have no other glass. Works well for lite-macro use too.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby xerubus on Thu Jan 13, 2005 12:04 pm

thanks onyx.... i'm thinking about the lens to cover me ... as i'll have the 50 f1.8 and the 85 f1.4 .... might be nice to have a good quality zoom handy....

cheers
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane


Return to General Discussion