Unsharp mask settings in PS!!!

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Unsharp mask settings in PS!!!

Postby Raydar on Thu Jan 13, 2005 5:52 pm

Just read a thread concerning Unsharp mask in PS.
Thought it would be good to see what settings every one uses & see how many deferent setting there is.

I use.......
Amount: 150
Radius: 1.5
Threshold: Between 0 & 10 depending on the image.

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

Postby digitor on Thu Jan 13, 2005 6:07 pm

It depends on the image, but I use anything from:

Amount : 30 - 200
Radius : 0.4 - 1
Threshold : 1 -5

I have sharpening set to "Normal" in the camera, and shoot raw. If I use NC to convert, I'll leave the NC sharpening setting unchanged, (in other words no USM in NC, just leave the sharpening unchanged in Advanced Raw) and use the lower end of the above settings in PS, but if I use Raw Magick to convert I'll convert the image unsharpened, and use a higher level in PS. Also depending on the purpose of the sharpening, i.e. for a print, for a web image, or whatever. Also I make a point to sharpen as the last step.

Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
User avatar
digitor
Senior Member
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

Postby darb on Thu Jan 13, 2005 6:23 pm

my "d70 defog' action is 20%, 17 pixels, 0 thresh.
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby Raydar on Thu Jan 13, 2005 6:40 pm

I think there’s going to be some different settings in this lot 8)

I’ve got all the image enhancement stuff turned off in Cam.
I would rather have more control over them in PS & try & get as quicker Wright speed happnin with the Cam.

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

Postby digitor on Thu Jan 13, 2005 6:45 pm

darb wrote:my "d70 defog' action is 20%, 17 pixels, 0 thresh.


This seems to work as a contrast booster, similar to Thom Hogan's suggestion at the end of this article: http://www.bythom.com/sharpening.htm

Cheers
What's another word for "thesaurus"?
User avatar
digitor
Senior Member
 
Posts: 925
Joined: Tue Nov 16, 2004 9:53 pm
Location: Tea Tree Gully, South Australia

Postby Onyx on Thu Jan 13, 2005 6:48 pm

Med low or none for sharpening in camera.

Resized to approx 1000 pixels on the long side, my USM setting are:

150-200 amount
0.4 radius
threshold of 5.

On the odd chance I run USM on a full sized (ie. 3008x2000) image, radius gets bumped up to 1.5 or so, judged by eye.

Any image taken with the 70-200VR lens doesn't get the USM treatment, as it's IMHO sharp enough out of camera.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby MattC on Thu Jan 13, 2005 7:10 pm

Amount 70-200 or so.
Radius 0.3-0.5
Threshold 0

Of course these values vary according to the image.

Important thing to remember when sharpening, is not to over sharpen. From my own experience, it is better to keep changes small and if need be, sharpen twice. Nothing ruins a pic quicker than excessive use of USM. Better not to sharpen at all than to over sharpen.

Cheers

Matt
MattC
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1061
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 6:59 pm
Location: Pilbara WA

Postby hillsrain on Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:18 pm

Have a go at 500/0.2/0 The mileage with this will vary per image.
Most of the time I use 100-200/0.3 or 0.4/ 2 to 8.
My "clarify" for sky/weather shots varies between 10/40/0 to 20/50/0 depending on the pic. A good local contrast enhancer.
I have noticed a significant difference in how sharpening looks from an LCD to a CRT. I always look in the USM window at 300% and the image window at 100% when sharpening to keep halos "out of the picture". (Bad pun LOL)
Cheers,
Tim
User avatar
hillsrain
Newbie
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:08 pm
Location: Meadows SA

Postby sirhc55 on Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:21 pm

Normally 180/0.5/0

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby glamy on Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:25 pm

I normally use 170-220/0.3/0
Gearard
User avatar
glamy
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1112
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2004 8:38 pm
Location: S/W Sydney- D70+D2X

Postby darb on Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:27 pm

hmm geez looks like my sharpening is tiny ... i might have to try some of these larger amounts !
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby darb on Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:35 pm

ive just tried like the 150 / 0.8 / 5 (for example) on a few full res images and it creates a bucketload of noise!
User avatar
darb
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1020
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 12:03 am
Location: allll ovvverr (live in perth)

Postby Greg B on Thu Jan 13, 2005 8:50 pm

The differences are interesting.

Threshhold determines how much of your image gets sharpened.

0 means every pixel is processed.

The higher the number, the fewer pixels are affected.

I have read that 3 to 4 is good for threshhold to avoid an over sharpened appearance.
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Matty B on Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:06 pm

I agree with those who say this will be a variable amount. I generally use 75 - 150% / 0.5 - 5 pixels / 1 to 4 threshold. I find it depends on what degree of bright / backlight hightlights I have on the subject in question as to how hard to sharpen without losing a natural appearance. I tend to go (subjective of course) with a lesser un-sharp masked effect than more. I find it an invaluable tool for my hand-held exposures, especially in windy conditions!

I have printed many pics after using the unsharp mask tool and find that lot (and more) practice is required to guesstimate your requirements for this application. Ok- I'll shut -up now! :wink:
Shoot early - Shoot often
User avatar
Matty B
Member
 
Posts: 207
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2005 12:22 am
Location: Birregurra - Garden Paradise, Victoria

In camera settings

Postby leigh999 on Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:14 pm

I wonder how the various settings people are using fit together with the in-camera sharpening. I have read that it is best to turn in camera sharpening to none and then apply all sharpening in PS. So I often use amounts over 200%.

What do other people do with the D70 sharpen settings?
User avatar
leigh999
Member
 
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Dec 05, 2004 2:39 pm
Location: Brisbane

Postby hillsrain on Thu Jan 13, 2005 9:15 pm

Who here sharpens selectively using layer masks?
I find it invaluable especially landscapes where sky and foreground require different levels of sharpening. :D
User avatar
hillsrain
Newbie
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:08 pm
Location: Meadows SA

Postby Raydar on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:30 pm

Yeah some times mate.
Most of the time I just sharpen the flattened image just before I save it.

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW

Postby hillsrain on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:36 pm

Yeah Ray USM is usually the last of the PP'ing tasks. I mostly shoot landscapes where large broad areas of colour such as blue sky or black clouds are a noise magnet. Any USM here is a no-no. I use layering a lot, not only to broaden dynamic range as in this pic - http://www.darwinonline.org/displayimag ... 27&pos=131 but to keep noise out of skies. I do regularly use 10-40-0 on cloudy skies though as a local contrast enhancer.
Cheers,
Tim :D
User avatar
hillsrain
Newbie
 
Posts: 33
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2004 10:08 pm
Location: Meadows SA

Postby Raydar on Fri Jan 14, 2005 5:39 am

Cool I’ll have to try that.
I’ll give anything a go that concerns PS, all ways learning!!!! :? 8)

Cheers
Ray :P
>> All of us could take a lesson from the weather. It pays no attention to criticism<<
User avatar
Raydar
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1366
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 7:57 am
Location: Lismore, Northern - NSW


Return to General Discussion

cron