Art or Dreck?Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Art or Dreck?I'm unbelievably unsure about this. Sometimes I love it - other times I hate it. Taken on the long lens workshop @ Blues point with my new Nikon 12-24mm lens. Had the camera set wrong (yup newbie ). The larger version is in my pixspot gallery here
Give me your verdict - I can take it (I call the shot 2001) Last edited by stubbsy on Thu Jan 13, 2005 11:24 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Interesting Stubbsy - Blues Point Tower has to be one of the ugliest buildings on the Sydney foreshore so I like this photo because it does not show its ugly glory. As an after thought you could deep etch out the building to another layer and play with lighting, hue etc.
Chris Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Peter
The sky is stunning! Have you been able to process this in Photoshop? There are a few tricks that might reveal more detail in the building. It won't work for me without a bit of extra PP. But good that you took the shot anyway...that's how we learn and grow. Regards
Matt. K
That's where I have a problem, guys. I'm not sure how to separate out the building & the background in PS to play with the two separately. I figure I need to create another layer (tried selecting a colour range then cutting & pasting but this didn't work). As it stands this has had minimal tweaking (pretty much looked like this to start with). I tried playing with curves & brightness & contrast and either blow out the clouds or bring the building up so much it just looks like a building! Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Drek ?What is Drek referring to ?
If it is German for rubbish or dirt it is Dreck. Regards Old Kraut: regards CD
christiand
Oops. Knew the word, didn't know the spelling. Yes German for rubbish. Now fixed. Thanks. Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Also Yiddish, same meaning. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Stubbsy A trick I would try with this shot would be:
open another image at the current EV level copy the darker image, and paste it over the lighter image use the eraser tool to rub away the "darker" building, exposing the lighter one beneath. The sky will remain the same. You can erase anything that you want to appear "lighter" than the top image. you may have to experiment with EV levels to find the right combination Here are a couple of posts in dpreview describing this technique in greater detail. http://www.pbase.com/nowhereatoll/post_processing_demo1 http://www.pbase.com/nowhereatoll/combining_two_exposures_ Good luck
I love the sky but with the large shadow in the foreground it appears someone has taken scissors to your photo. It just seems flat to me....
Andy D70, 70-200VR, 18-70, 50 1.8, SB800
Blackberry PIN: 2029497E
Here's another way...and a favourite PS technique of mine...it's called a contrast mask and the stepS are pretty simple.
Open the image and create a Second layer...CONTROL+J......go to image adjustments/DESATURATE...this turn the copy into black and white...then...image adjustment INVERT....this creates a negative...then filter/blur and slightly blur the negative...then LAYERS, (FROM THE WINDOW MENU) AND TOP RIGHT HAND MENU..LAYER MODE...CHANGE IT TO SOFT LIGHT. NOW TOP RIGHT HAND...CHANGE THE OPACITY TO SUIT THE IMAGE. See if that works for you. Regards
Matt. K
Matt, interesting technique, I'm going to try it.
Phillip, nice work, good outcome. Greg - - - - D200 etc
Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see. - Arthur Schopenhauer
Using eraser toolor, one that doesn't look like it suffers from the dreaded pf
Previous topic • Next topic
14 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|