some band photography *Now with pictures

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

some band photography *Now with pictures

Postby Thommo on Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:51 pm

hey guys, some of you may have seen my thread in which i was asking about how to effectively take live band photos. well my trial gig was on friday night and i had a ball, got to enjoy the best of both worlds, listening to a band i love and taking some cool photos...

anyway i dont know how to judge these so i will let you guys, most have been cropped and colours and brightness played with a bit, but here they are.

Pics are now up at http://www.pixspot.com/thumbnails.php?album=73


a big thanks must be said to all the guys who gave me some pointers, esp gary helping with flash settings. most of the photos were taken on shutter priority at about 1/50 with the flash dialed back to between -1and2
Last edited by Thommo on Sun Jan 16, 2005 6:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby Thommo on Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:52 pm

ergh cant get the image tags to work
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby birddog114 on Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:53 pm

thommo,
I couldn't see the pics! sorry!
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Thommo on Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:54 pm

ahh crap i thought ug box worked on here....
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby gstark on Sun Jan 16, 2005 6:05 pm

Says I'm disallowed.

Sounds to me as if they have a problem.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Thommo on Sun Jan 16, 2005 6:08 pm

yeh im just in the process of uploading to pixspot, what is the maximum pixels though
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby Thommo on Sun Jan 16, 2005 6:38 pm

should work now
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby MHD on Sun Jan 16, 2005 6:48 pm

Such a hard subject to capture!

What apetures did you use? Were these taken with the 50/1.8?

I (not knowing the full story) would have opened the lens up a bit more, tried to get closer and get head shots with a blurred background...

But I have never shot a band before :)

Where was it (looks like ANUbar)
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Thommo on Sun Jan 16, 2005 7:21 pm

was taken at the ground floor in belco, i think most of these were taken at f1.8-2
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby MHD on Sun Jan 16, 2005 8:45 pm

Kewl... Were you as close as you could get?

This is where a zoom like the 80-200 would be nice... or for true money the 80/1.4
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby W00DY on Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:04 pm

Not bad photos of the band but they all look a little to dark for my liking.

This is probably how the actual stage looked ( :?: ) but maybe a little more lighter would have done the trick.

W00DY
Andrew
Nikon D3 and lot's of Nikon stuff!!
User avatar
W00DY
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1541
Joined: Wed Aug 18, 2004 6:44 pm
Location: Sydney - Hills District

Postby birddog114 on Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:18 pm

W00DY wrote:Not bad photos of the band but they all look a little to dark for my liking.

This is probably how the actual stage looked ( :?: ) but maybe a little more lighter would have done the trick.

W00DY


Thommo has the 50/1.8 and he tried to capture the full body, it's imposible to have a great capture like the way he want, half body shoot will look nicer. IMHO the 50/1.4 will do more for this type of shooting than the 50/1.8, or the 85/1.4 or 70-200VR and shoot in distance.
Last edited by birddog114 on Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Greg B on Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:20 pm

Thommo, I know how hard it is in that environment, I reckon you have done well.

I think they are a bit dark too, I took the liberty of tweaking one a bit to show what I mean, also a bit cropped. Hope that's OK - PM me if you want it removed.



Image

cheers
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Postby Thommo on Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:52 pm

no thats fine greg...

as you said birdie i was trying to capture the full body, to me it just looked better but it also was a pain int he butt to try and pull off successfullly
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby Thommo on Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:55 pm

W00DY wrote:Not bad photos of the band but they all look a little to dark for my liking.

This is probably how the actual stage looked ( :?: ) but maybe a little more lighter would have done the trick.

W00DY


yeh woody the stage lighting was worse than usual, it was all the most basic lights that didnt even cover the stage, it was a nightmare trying to get a shot of nick (the drumme) also as i said before i thought it was harder having so many people on a small stage... also the trombone player had practicly no light on him...

i know the lighting at their next gig will be better
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby MHD on Sun Jan 16, 2005 9:57 pm

If it wasn't hard everyone would be doing it :)
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby Thommo on Sun Jan 16, 2005 10:01 pm

MHD wrote:If it wasn't hard everyone would be doing it :)


well i dont mind, i had soo much fun. and i found that knowing the guys made it easier to know when to shoot and when they will do something funny or cool, if this was a band that i had never heard before i think it would be even harder....

next thing on the cards is a SB800 though... but will have to wait until after big day out
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython

Postby gstark on Mon Jan 17, 2005 6:26 am

Thommo wrote:[yeh woody the stage lighting was worse than usual, it was all the most basic lights that didnt even cover the stage, it was a nightmare trying to get a shot of nick (the drumme) also as i said before i thought it was harder having so many people on a small stage... also the trombone player had practicly no light on him...


Without knowing the specific venue, I'm inclined to say that no, the lighting was not worse than normalk, and that no, it won't be better next time. From these images, it seems to me that this is a typical pub venue, probably the sounbd guy - who has no concept of what the sound should really be like - doing the lighting.

Given that he has no concept of what the sound should be like, you're well behind the eight-ball when it comes to lighting. Wait until they figure it's cool to turn the red lights on and off in time with music. :)

Good work nonetheless, Thommo. You can see what I mean by the contrast range - you have massive dark backgrounds to deal with, and they should be ignored from the exposure perspective - centre or spot only.

Given that you're using 50 and trying to shoot full length, you're going to be forcing yourself back away from the stage when compared with using the kit or 24-120 lenses. That's going to increase your flash to subject distance, so the -1.3 that I use is probably a little too much, and you may be exceeding the capacity of the gun.

I've found that the FEC I need varies from location to location, and yes, you have to pay attention to what you're shooting and from where. Given you're shooting at an increased distance, reduced FEC may be the go here; certainly, experiment and play.

Your comments about the 'bone player not being illuminated at all and the similarly the drummer are not at all surprising, and very typical. But the D70 should be able to focus and shoot with no major issues at all. Again, adjust the FEC for those subjects to compensate.

And don't forget - you can also play with ISO; bump it to 400 ... 600 ... 800 ... see what results you get. You'll have heaps of noise in the dark regions at 1600, but you'll be surprised at what you can pull out as you become more comfortable with the venue's lighting and how it affects exposure.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Thommo on Mon Jan 17, 2005 1:28 pm

thanks heaps for you help gary, will have to try it out next week
User avatar
Thommo
Member
 
Posts: 467
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2004 12:31 am
Location: Canberra, Bonython


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques