who uses adobe?

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

who uses adobe?

Postby diver_neil on Wed Jul 19, 2006 12:46 am

I am really fascinated on the pictures posted by other members here…vivid colors , sharp etc…I just wonder if they use adobe apps such as photoshop cs, elements etc. to produce awesome output? :wink:
diver_neil
Newbie
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:04 am
Location: Philippines

Postby DStrom on Wed Jul 19, 2006 1:35 am

the only adobe product i currently use is Acrobat ... :lol: :lol:

However, I use Nikon Capture for my photos ... :wink:
User avatar
DStrom
Member
 
Posts: 273
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 1:38 pm
Location: Erskineville, Sydney - Nikon D300 / D70

Postby Nnnnsic on Wed Jul 19, 2006 2:55 am

You should be able to get pretty much any decent photo editing program to push colours in a photo.

That said, a lot of it will always come down to the shot and the photographer's skill (or luck in some cases).
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby diver_neil on Wed Jul 19, 2006 4:23 am

so most of the shots taken are edited from the softwares thats why most of the pixs are awsome, i was thinking that its just on the camera settings aperture and shutter. do we really need to do edit it just to make it nice...what happened to photographers skills? most of us are not graphic artist like i do. :wink:
diver_neil
Newbie
 
Posts: 14
Joined: Tue Jul 18, 2006 4:04 am
Location: Philippines

Postby stubbsy on Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:10 am

The real answer to your question depends on how you shoot. If you shoot jpeg then in camera settings will make your image look different to if you took the same image bit saved it in a RAW format (Nikon NEF or Canon CRW).

If you shoot jpeg and have set your camera up to meet your needs, you may not need to post process the image. If you shoot raw (and there are a lot of reasons to do so - just search for more on that) then you WILL need to post process the image in a graphics package.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby mark on Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:23 am

diver_neil wrote:.....do we really need to do edit it just to make it nice...what happened to photographers skills? ......


Good photographers made many prints in the darkroom varying exposure time, dodging/burning/croping, coloured filters ect... to obtain the best possible print of their image.

Surely it could be said that the modern digital photographers darkroom would be post proccessing :) So IMHO if your not pp'ing your shots then your only doing half the job. Take the time to learn some form of pp program, they are not that hard to use... :wink:
User avatar
mark
Member
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:56 am
Location: Byron Bay | Northern NSW

Postby DaveB on Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:47 am

Was the question regarding people using PP or not?
I thought it was regarding whether people used Adobe apps for PP or whether they used something else.

Personally I use some Adobe apps (Photoshop CS2, Lightroom [a bit], and InDesign CS2 [for book layouts]) combined with non-Adobe software (e.g. iView MediaPro for file/image management). But that's because I've found a workflow that works for me. It's efficient, allows me to cope with thousands of images per shoot if necessary, and provides a consistent quality I'm happy with.

That's not to say that non-Adobe won't do a good job: before I moved to the Apple platform, GIMP and ImageMagick were my workhorses on my BSD machines.
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby stubbsy on Wed Jul 19, 2006 10:55 am

DaveB wrote:Was the question regarding people using PP or not?


Yes, and no Dave. It was originally, but then diver_neil came back and asked another question :wink:
i was thinking that its just on the camera settings aperture and shutter. do we really need to do edit it just to make it nice.
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions

cron