Testing 80-400 VR and pics for critiqueModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Testing 80-400 VR and pics for critiqueHi,
Was in Darling Harbour looking for something intersting to test my new 80-400 VR and found Water Skiing Show If you click to "picture properties" at the right top corner you'll see EXIF data. No tripod was used. Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
Re: Testing 80-400 VR and pics for critique
Hilop, Great to hear that you've got the 80-400VR, this event is coming every year during Sydney Festival month in January, also there're so many actions with these group in water skiing and many opportunities to shoot. I hope you'll find the 80-400VR will be your companion in the future and wherever you travel. With the 80-400VR, you can see and feel how flexi it is, cos no required tripod or monopod attached to it, your reaction will be fast and hardly to miss any shot, guess: if it attached with the monopod or tripod, how hard can you handle it with these fast action shoot. They're all tack sharp eventhought the lighting not in your favour 100% That how and why people paid for the two letter VR Last edited by birddog114 on Sun Jan 16, 2005 5:51 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
Hlop
It is not easy to give critique on action photos such as these that are sharp, caught the action, good colour, etc. and bloody good. The 80-400VR in your hands has produced a series of photos to keep Chris PS - by the way the above is critique Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
Critique follows....Firstly, the lens produces crisp, saturated images. I haven't checked all the EXIFs for shutter speeds - as I have a VR lens myself I am aware of their awesome capacity.
The pix that work better in your gallery are the ones where the water-ski action occupies most of the frame. Pic #8 is a great action shot of the skier, but would have been much better with a more blurred background or different viewpoint to eliminate the cluttered background. #7 is better in this regard, but perhaps would have benefited by being able to see more of the tow-boat and having the skier in the upper one-third of the LHS. #5 may be improved if you crop out some of the white marquee and bystanders in the background. Working in such a big arena as Darling Harbour is a challenge, even with a long telephoto, and the photographers vantage point becomes critical. Framing your image so that all of the action is not in the centre of the frame is difficult, but you must do this to have better than average work in this difficult field. Don't be discouraged - you are presenting images and asking for honest feedback, so if you continue to do this and are prepared to listen to the criticism that makes sense to you, you will undoubtedly improve. PS - I looked through the rest of your galleries, and you are obviously quite an experienced, and good, photographer. That's why I didn't waste your time complimenting you on excellent focussing and exposure - I figured you were looking for something a bit deeper. Hope I was right! Trevor
Thanks for your feed back guys!
cricketfan, Many special thanks for analyzing my pics. Definitely, there is no offense at all - I'm asking your opinion to improve my skills so critique helps and I'm really glad to get it About the rest of my gallery .... Actually, before I've got D70 I had Nikon F60 but I was photographing in "point'n'shoot" style and even if I was able to get few good frames it comes of far away past experience (from my childhood) when I had FED-3 Camera And BTW, I still have this camera Mikhail
Hasselblad 501CM, XPAN, Wista DX 4x5, Pentax 67, Nikon D70, FED-2
Previous topic • Next topic
8 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|