D200 Problems

A place for us to talk about Nikon related camera gear.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

D200 Problems

Postby pharmer on Sun Aug 06, 2006 6:26 pm

Here we go, - I knew that I'd eventually get this and it seems to pop up pretty routinely these days.

Any shot over ISO250 and blown highlights or deliberate high key effect induces banding around the highlight.

My D200 was brought in June (grey import) and my friends D200 in June (Maxwell stock) - his does the same (and told by Maxwell thats its acceptable and all D200's short band and it cannot be fixed

An example - straight RAW file to JPG conversion

The Full image:
Image

The banding: (100%)
Image

Is this acceptable and in-spec? I hope not, considering no other DSLR I've ever used (D50, D70s, 30D, 5D) does this with blown/highkey shots

Thoughts or opinions. Am I been too picky with a $2100 camera?
Last edited by pharmer on Mon Aug 07, 2006 2:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby shutterbug on Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:18 pm

I had banding in both my D200 but they are fixed now via Maxwell.

Also does it show up on print?
User avatar
shutterbug
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1853
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2005 11:32 am
Location: A Pub in Sydney / Bankstown

Postby birddog114 on Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:19 pm

Pharmer,
You asked and I reply:
No, not accepted as I mentioned few times here.
The early batches of D200 were not good and pls. try to stay away and have your money in your pocket till the latest batches of D200 available.
Nikon ignored it and Maxwell don't fix it.
I have three D200 sold to one of my Coporate customers in Dec. and returned to Maxwell in January, but there was no resolution :twisted:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:20 pm

shutterbug wrote:I had banding in both my D200 but they are fixed now via Maxwell.

Also does it show up on print?


Depend on what type of banding, not all will fix or fixed.

Yes, depend on, it may appear on print.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby pharmer on Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:25 pm

Its a very new one - QC'd in late May. I thought the issue should be solved by now.

If I can't get a resolution from my dealer - Canon here I come.
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby gstark on Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:30 pm

Barrie,

What I'm seeing is more of an artefact of the extreme contrast you're trying to capture in this image - it's beyond the scope of the sensor to process this.

Given the scene, I'd call it acceptable.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby pharmer on Sun Aug 06, 2006 8:43 pm

gstark wrote:Barrie,

What I'm seeing is more of an artefact of the extreme contrast you're trying to capture in this image - it's beyond the scope of the sensor to process this.

Given the scene, I'd call it acceptable.


Well - why not render it blown only then. Banding is an out of sync channel issue. The D50/D70 and 30D/5D (i've used them in exact situations like this) - don't do this

I also presume the D2x does not do this either

Photographers have been shooting high contrast scenes like this for years - and living with the blown areas. Thats fine, but then banding on top of that - no way
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby Steffen on Sun Aug 06, 2006 9:56 pm

Barrie, have you tried different RAW converters? Maybe it's a bug in the way the D2000 RAW data is interpreted?

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby Steffen on Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:00 pm

Barrie, have you tried different RAW converters? Maybe it's a bug in the way the D200 RAW data is interpreted?

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby terminator on Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:21 pm

I definately think it can and should be fixed.
I have had my d200 since April (grey Japanese stock) and taken close to 1800 shots.
Not one image with ANY hint of ANY banding whatsoever.
I agree with you that it`s not good enough.
Nikon should be accountable and either fix it or refund you.
Termy,
http://www.glennlegge.com
"There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs."
Ansel Adams (1902 - 1984)
User avatar
terminator
Member
 
Posts: 164
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2005 1:23 pm
Location: Woody Point QLD

Postby Matt. K on Sun Aug 06, 2006 10:39 pm

Is this the only instance where you have the banding or does it happen all the time? Under extreme lighting conditions the rare ocurrence is acceptable.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Postby pharmer on Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:18 am

Matt. K wrote:Is this the only instance where you have the banding or does it happen all the time? Under extreme lighting conditions the rare ocurrence is acceptable.


Any situation with backlighting or highkey and ISO250 and over - banding everytime. eg An ambient light wedding shot next to a very bright white window - a very common type of shot.

Some you can see even at 2/3 enlargement on screen, others you have to look at 100% crop.

I'll see what happens this week with regards to warranty and go from there.
pharmer
Member
 
Posts: 476
Joined: Sat Jan 28, 2006 11:21 pm
Location: Tauranga, New Zealand

Postby gstark on Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:33 am

pharmer wrote:Well - why not render it blown only then.


If you're shooting beyond the expected parameters within which the sensor is expected to perform, all bets are off, as far as I'm concerned. You cannot really say it should do this or it should do that,can you? You've already broken the rules, and you should therefore expect the unexpected.

Banding is an out of sync channel issue. The D50/D70 and 30D/5D (i've used them in exact situations like this) - don't do this


So what? This is not one of those cameras. They will exhibit different problems trying to render that part of the scene in question, and the comparison is not valid.

Likewise for the D2x.


Photographers have been shooting high contrast scenes like this for years [//quote]

Using film, not digital, technology. They're two very different mediums.

I really think that what you're seeing is an expected outcome. I'm not for a moment suggesting it's good. What I am saying is that when you really stretch the limits as you have in this instance, you don't really have a right to expect results that you would expect from a simple, low contrast scene.



- and living with the blown areas. Thats fine, but then banding on top of that - no way
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby gstark on Mon Aug 07, 2006 12:41 am

pharmer wrote:Any situation with backlighting


This is not simple backlighting or high key though.

Look at the whole image: it's an interior of a an older style arcade: a dark area at the best of times. Your exposure for the shot was 1/20 and f/5.6 at ISO 400.

While I don't know what the exterior conditons were like, we're looking at the sky, outside, and my guesstimate would be overcast, f/16 and 1/125 at the same ISO.

You need to reconcile and accept that this is a very signifcant exposure descrepancy, and it's that discrepancy that you needs to deal with, not any problem with the camera.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Michael on Mon Aug 07, 2006 1:03 am

I bought My d200 before pharmer and haven't got any banding at all, must be the luck of the draw.
Are we there yet?
User avatar
Michael
Senior Member
 
Posts: 685
Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 8:48 pm
Location: Toowoomba QLD

Postby whiz on Mon Aug 07, 2006 8:19 am

I think it's an early adopter problem. Even though, I'd be pissed if mine still did it.
I've not shot enough images in odd situations to see if my new baby does it, but I'm convinced already that it's a better camera than my D70.
People put way too much rubbish in signature blocks.


Image
whiz
Member
 
Posts: 203
Joined: Thu Apr 28, 2005 7:28 pm
Location: Richardson, Canberra

Postby Reschsmooth on Mon Aug 07, 2006 3:52 pm

Pharmer - I took almost exactly the same pic with my D200 about a month ago (I have since thrown out the many Haigh's wrappers!). I will have a look at mine tonight and see if there is any banding. We had a pretty overcast but not a very dark day, so there maybe highlights in my photos.

Cheers

P
User avatar
Reschsmooth
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4164
Joined: Tue Aug 01, 2006 2:16 pm
Location: Just next to S'nives.


Return to Nikon