18-135mm or 18-70mm?Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
18-135mm or 18-70mm?I am planning to buy a D80(my first dslr) in the near future and I am wondering whether I should go with the 18-135mm or 18-70mm. Because the 18-135 comes as a kit there is only a < 10 dollar price difference.I have to to make the order in the next couple days so I cant really wait around for more reviews.
I've heard decent things about 18-70 but I haven’t heard much about the 18-135 and only seen the Ken Rockwell review at http://www.kenrockwell.com/nikon/18-135.htm I generally have some doubts about KR reviews but he does mention the 18-135mm has significant distortion. However, Ill be getting the 10-20mm Sigma so i wont be using the wide end much. Im guessing few if any of you have used the 18-135mm lens but if you had a similar decision to make which way would you go? I’m also open to suggestion on similar lenses in the same price bracket. Thanks in advance. Last edited by rasice on Wed Sep 13, 2006 3:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Its hard to decide on a new lens that has just been out for quite a little amount of time.
I believe that nobody (if any) in this forum have bough a 18-135 yet. Tho many of us has the 18-70 and will be granted that it is a great value lens. From the pictures, I see the 18-70 is little bit better built than the 18-135, i cant say much about it since I never seen or touched the 18-135. From my PoV, the 18-135 has no focus distance window or scale, so you wont be able to do any focusing using a distance (hyperfocals).
I used the 18-70 as my main lens for a year on the D70 - fantastic lens. So if you want tried and true, the 18-70 is the go.
Otherwise take the leap for the extra length and let us know how you go. But remember you can pick up cheap zooms 70-200 and 70-300 to extend your reach. So it looks like a good coverage there, with a 10-20, 18-70 and perhaps a zoom at some point. D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery "We don't know and we don't care"
Hi, I've not used the 18-135, but have used the 18-70 on my d70 and d200 for over a year. It's one hell of a good lens, especially considering it's "just" a kit lens. I would "guess" that at 18-135, the gymnastics that would be needed with the optics in the 18-135 would make it less good than the 18-70 from an optical perspective. Mind you, in good light around f8 - f11, any lens will probably work well. Unless people are giving rave reviews on the 18-135, I'd go the 18-70 as prices are similar.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
A 70-200 range considered 'cheap' zoom with a 70-300??
Re: 18-135mm or 18-70mm?Where are you getting yours from? Where I'm looking, it's a $100 difference. btw, I'm getting a D80 very soon. I will be getting the 18-70mm lens and have picked up myself a cheap 70-300.
Re: 18-135mm or 18-70mm?I have decided to go with the 18-70mm. Thanks for posting
18-135mm 1909 kit at camerastore, 18-70mm kit 1899 at teds. Where are you planning to get your gear from?
Previous topic • Next topic
10 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|