Adventures with reversing rings

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Adventures with reversing rings

Postby Hyena on Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:25 pm

Hey guys,

I just recieved my 52mm lens reversal ring (12.95 US delivered from ebay :) ) and started playing with it using my nikkor 50mm f1.8

So far I've noticed a few issues, I don't know if these are the norm when using reversing rings - maybe Yi-P or others who've used them can comment.


- there seems to be an incredibly shallow DOF. At f1.8 it's around 1mm and f5.6 only about 5mm.

- the images are really dark. Even at ISO 800 with the exposure comp at +5.0 I have to use a shutter speed of < 1/100 to get a semi-decently exposed pic at f1.8 and at f5.6 1/50 is too dark, and obviously a bit blury being hand held. Using a tripod is the obvious answer but with such narrow DOF it'd make it tough trying to get the focus right moving a few mm closer or further away.

- It won't take a shot with the flash activated, although I suppose it's probably getting too close to the object anyway.



Image
f1.8 1/125

Image
f5.6 1/50


Any comments/suggestions would be apprectiated :?

Cheers,

Jay
Jay
---
Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
User avatar
Hyena
Member
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: Cronulla, Sydney

Postby Glen on Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:50 pm

Jay, spot on with the DOF. Most macro shots are taken at very small apertures. I would suggest f22 for that lens and the DOF will still be small
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Hyena on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:11 pm

Glen, I tried it just now at f22 and I needed a 1 sec shutter speed at ISO 1600 to get a reasonable exposure. Surely that can't be right...
Jay
---
Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
User avatar
Hyena
Member
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: Cronulla, Sydney

Postby greencardigan on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:13 pm

Yes, dof will be ridiculously small unless you use smaller apertures.

A tripod with a macro focusing rail is handy in this situation. But you should be able to handhold with a suitable flash setup.
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby Yi-P on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:14 pm

My tips for this macro setup:

- Stop lens down to at least f/8 (I will say f/8 or f/16)

- Arm your flash with manual setting. Built in flash (CSM -> Flash -> Manual -- 1/4 or 1/2, depending on your f/stop)

- Take your shutter/flash to control exposure, avoid below 1/250 (extreme closeup magnifies vibration by alot)

- When focusing:
* Hold your camera steady and look deeply in the viewfinder... see your dark VF at f/16? hehe
* now use your left hand, place you index finger on the aperture control lever on the rear of the lens. Should be a very little lever that moves along with the aperture blades...
* press down SLIGHTLY (!!!!) yes, SLIGHTLY!! on the aperture lever
* look in your viewfinder, WOAH! now you can see the light
* release your finger from the lever and squeeze the shutter, repeat back again

Now you've got yourself integrated with the aperture mechanism in the camera/mirror box :P
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby MATT on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:20 pm

Yep they are similar results to what I got, I reversed my 50 1.8 onto a 70-300g .. I'll try to dig out some shots but it was similar to what i was gettting.

MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----

Postby Yi-P on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:29 pm

Why the 50/1.8 on top of the 70-300? You can definately focuse very very close with that setup, but you lose too much light in the process and makes handholding near impossible and needs of a stable platform/focusing rail.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby greencardigan on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:29 pm

MATT wrote:I reversed my 50 1.8 onto a 70-300g

That's the way I usually use reversed lenses too.

The following 2 pics were done like that. Both handheld.

1st one was the 70-300g with a reversed 55mm.

2nd one was the 70-300g with a reversed 28mm.

http://www.greencardigan.com/gallery/d/255-2/furryfriend.jpg
http://www.greencardigan.com/gallery/d/311-2/2620334-lg.jpg
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby Hyena on Fri Sep 22, 2006 4:27 pm

Yi-P wrote:My tips for this macro setup:

I love you Yi-P :D
I knew I must have just been doing something wrong!
I didn't know about the ap lever, I was manually turning the ap ring to try and see enough light to focus, then turn it back to take the shot - your method is much better!

Greencardigan those are some great macros in your gallery! Were they all taken using a reversed lens or a dedicated macro ?
I'm gonna go harassing spiders and insects in the garden when I get home tonight :lol:

In the mean time, here's a shot of my afternoon snack :)

Image
Jay
---
Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
User avatar
Hyena
Member
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: Cronulla, Sydney

Postby the foto fanatic on Fri Sep 22, 2006 4:43 pm

Hyena wrote:[
In the mean time, here's a shot of my afternoon snack :)


Alien V? Or just some salted pistachios?
Good to see you are getting that reversing ring going!
TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present
My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic
Nikon stuff!
User avatar
the foto fanatic
Moderator
 
Posts: 4212
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane

Postby Hyena on Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:21 pm

cricketfan wrote:Alien V?

Heh, funny you should say that, I have a small collection of full size alien models - the Face Hugger is my fave but it's currently in storage under the house because it creeps out my missus :lol:
Jay
---
Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
User avatar
Hyena
Member
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: Cronulla, Sydney

Postby Hyena on Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:58 am

My first and possibly last spider macro :lol:

Image

I was holding the aperture control lever open as desribed by Yi-P but wasn't real comfortable having my hand only a few mm away from the spider, especially when I was hitting him with the flash from on a few cm away it must have been like a bolt of lightning. He didn't seem to move after a few shots, but I didn't want to push my luck :)
Jay
---
Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
User avatar
Hyena
Member
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: Cronulla, Sydney

Re: Adventures with reversing rings

Postby gstark on Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:48 am

Jay,

The issues you raise are quite normal for macro and reversing ring work.

DoF will, indeed, be very shallow.

Tripod is almost a must; use a small aperture, and as someone else suggested, something like a focusing rail on the 'pod is a good idea. Often when shooting macros, the correct focusing method is to move the camera backwards or fowards very slightly in order to acquire focus.

Loss of light is quite normal too; consider the use of a ring flash setup, or the Nikon R1C1.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby greencardigan on Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:31 am

Hyena wrote:Greencardigan those are some great macros in your gallery! Were they all taken using a reversed lens or a dedicated macro ?

Hey thanks. Pretty much all my macro shots are with the Sigma 105mm.
User avatar
greencardigan
Senior Member
 
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
Location: Wollongong

Postby MATT on Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:03 am

greencardigan wrote:
MATT wrote:I reversed my 50 1.8 onto a 70-300g

That's the way I usually use reversed lenses too.

The following 2 pics were done like that. Both handheld.

1st one was the 70-300g with a reversed 55mm.

2nd one was the 70-300g with a reversed 28mm.

http://www.greencardigan.com/gallery/d/255-2/furryfriend.jpg
http://www.greencardigan.com/gallery/d/311-2/2620334-lg.jpg


well I wont be posting any of my crap pics now :oops: :lol: :lol:

But hyena looks like you got control now..Good Work


MATT
User avatar
MATT
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1748
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----


Return to General Discussion