Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.
Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
by Hyena on Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:25 pm
Hey guys,
I just recieved my 52mm lens reversal ring (12.95 US delivered from ebay  ) and started playing with it using my nikkor 50mm f1.8
So far I've noticed a few issues, I don't know if these are the norm when using reversing rings - maybe Yi-P or others who've used them can comment.
- there seems to be an incredibly shallow DOF. At f1.8 it's around 1mm and f5.6 only about 5mm.
- the images are really dark. Even at ISO 800 with the exposure comp at +5.0 I have to use a shutter speed of < 1/100 to get a semi-decently exposed pic at f1.8 and at f5.6 1/50 is too dark, and obviously a bit blury being hand held. Using a tripod is the obvious answer but with such narrow DOF it'd make it tough trying to get the focus right moving a few mm closer or further away.
- It won't take a shot with the flash activated, although I suppose it's probably getting too close to the object anyway.
f1.8 1/125
f5.6 1/50
Any comments/suggestions would be apprectiated
Cheers,
Jay
Jay --- Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
-

Hyena
- Member
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: Cronulla, Sydney
by Glen on Fri Sep 22, 2006 1:50 pm
Jay, spot on with the DOF. Most macro shots are taken at very small apertures. I would suggest f22 for that lens and the DOF will still be small
-

Glen
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 11819
- Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
- Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon
-
by Hyena on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:11 pm
Glen, I tried it just now at f22 and I needed a 1 sec shutter speed at ISO 1600 to get a reasonable exposure. Surely that can't be right...
Jay --- Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
-

Hyena
- Member
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: Cronulla, Sydney
by greencardigan on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:13 pm
Yes, dof will be ridiculously small unless you use smaller apertures.
A tripod with a macro focusing rail is handy in this situation. But you should be able to handhold with a suitable flash setup.
-

greencardigan
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
- Location: Wollongong
-
by Yi-P on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:14 pm
My tips for this macro setup:
- Stop lens down to at least f/8 (I will say f/8 or f/16)
- Arm your flash with manual setting. Built in flash (CSM -> Flash -> Manual -- 1/4 or 1/2, depending on your f/stop)
- Take your shutter/flash to control exposure, avoid below 1/250 (extreme closeup magnifies vibration by alot)
- When focusing:
* Hold your camera steady and look deeply in the viewfinder... see your dark VF at f/16? hehe
* now use your left hand, place you index finger on the aperture control lever on the rear of the lens. Should be a very little lever that moves along with the aperture blades...
* press down SLIGHTLY (!!!!) yes, SLIGHTLY!! on the aperture lever
* look in your viewfinder, WOAH! now you can see the light
* release your finger from the lever and squeeze the shutter, repeat back again
Now you've got yourself integrated with the aperture mechanism in the camera/mirror box 
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by MATT on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:20 pm
Yep they are similar results to what I got, I reversed my 50 1.8 onto a 70-300g .. I'll try to dig out some shots but it was similar to what i was gettting.
MATT
-

MATT
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1748
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
- Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----
by Yi-P on Fri Sep 22, 2006 2:29 pm
Why the 50/1.8 on top of the 70-300? You can definately focuse very very close with that setup, but you lose too much light in the process and makes handholding near impossible and needs of a stable platform/focusing rail.
-

Yi-P
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 3579
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
- Location: Sydney -- Ashfield
-
by Hyena on Fri Sep 22, 2006 4:27 pm
Yi-P wrote:My tips for this macro setup:
I love you Yi-P
I knew I must have just been doing something wrong!
I didn't know about the ap lever, I was manually turning the ap ring to try and see enough light to focus, then turn it back to take the shot - your method is much better!
Greencardigan those are some great macros in your gallery! Were they all taken using a reversed lens or a dedicated macro ?
I'm gonna go harassing spiders and insects in the garden when I get home tonight
In the mean time, here's a shot of my afternoon snack

Jay --- Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
-

Hyena
- Member
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: Cronulla, Sydney
by the foto fanatic on Fri Sep 22, 2006 4:43 pm
Hyena wrote:[ In the mean time, here's a shot of my afternoon snack 
Alien V? Or just some salted pistachios?
Good to see you are getting that reversing ring going!
-

the foto fanatic
- Moderator
-
- Posts: 4212
- Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2004 7:53 pm
- Location: Teneriffe, Brisbane
-
by Hyena on Fri Sep 22, 2006 10:21 pm
cricketfan wrote:Alien V?
Heh, funny you should say that, I have a small collection of full size alien models - the Face Hugger is my fave but it's currently in storage under the house because it creeps out my missus 
Jay --- Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
-

Hyena
- Member
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: Cronulla, Sydney
by Hyena on Sat Sep 23, 2006 12:58 am
My first and possibly last spider macro
I was holding the aperture control lever open as desribed by Yi-P but wasn't real comfortable having my hand only a few mm away from the spider, especially when I was hitting him with the flash from on a few cm away it must have been like a bolt of lightning. He didn't seem to move after a few shots, but I didn't want to push my luck 
Jay --- Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
-

Hyena
- Member
-
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
- Location: Cronulla, Sydney
by gstark on Sat Sep 23, 2006 8:48 am
Jay,
The issues you raise are quite normal for macro and reversing ring work.
DoF will, indeed, be very shallow.
Tripod is almost a must; use a small aperture, and as someone else suggested, something like a focusing rail on the 'pod is a good idea. Often when shooting macros, the correct focusing method is to move the camera backwards or fowards very slightly in order to acquire focus.
Loss of light is quite normal too; consider the use of a ring flash setup, or the Nikon R1C1.
g. Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
-

gstark
- Site Admin
-
- Posts: 22924
- Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
- Location: Bondi, NSW
by greencardigan on Mon Sep 25, 2006 10:31 am
Hyena wrote:Greencardigan those are some great macros in your gallery! Were they all taken using a reversed lens or a dedicated macro ?
Hey thanks. Pretty much all my macro shots are with the Sigma 105mm.
-

greencardigan
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2005 4:00 pm
- Location: Wollongong
-
by MATT on Mon Sep 25, 2006 11:03 am
well I wont be posting any of my crap pics now
But hyena looks like you got control now..Good Work
MATT
-

MATT
- Senior Member
-
- Posts: 1748
- Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2004 8:24 pm
- Location: Biloela, QLD-----nikon--D700-----
Return to General Discussion
|