Dust on sensor ?

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

Dust on sensor ?

Postby Hyena on Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:41 pm

Hey guys.

I'm still new to the DSLR world so I'm not sure if this is dust on my sensor or not. Learning the ropes and swapping different lenses back and forth and playing with reversing rings I guess it's more than likely I've got a spec or 2 of rubbish in there.

Anyway, just wanted to check before venturing onto the next step.
I took 3 shots, the 18-70mm, 50mm and the 3rd with no lens on.
When the sensor has dust on it is it normal that you don't see the dust with no lens on (as in this case) ??

Thanks

18-70mm
Image
50mm
Image
no lens
Image
Jay
---
Nikon D70 | 18-70mm F3.5-4.5 | 50mm F1.8 | Tamron 70-300mm F4-5.6
User avatar
Hyena
Member
 
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Jul 11, 2006 10:05 pm
Location: Cronulla, Sydney

Postby DaveB on Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:53 pm

Of course you'll see no dust with no lens on: the dust is sharpest at very small apertures. For advice on taking test shots have a look at this page.

Yes that does look like crud on your sensor, but a proper test shot will show you the full extent of the problem.
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby Laurie on Sat Sep 30, 2006 2:54 pm

thats interesting.
im going to say something very stupid, but if the camera has no lens on it it can not focus the light on the sensor properly, so the dust will not show up.
im probably very wrong and have probably given a couple of the pros here a laugh, my job is done
_Laurie
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby DaveB on Sat Sep 30, 2006 3:14 pm

Think of it this way:

With a large diffuse light source (e.g. a wide-open lens mount) the shadow cast by the dust onto the sensor will be very diffuse.

With a point source of light (well, something like f/22 is small even if not a point) the shadow cast by the dust will be fairly well-defined.
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby Yi-P on Sat Sep 30, 2006 4:14 pm

You cannot form an image without any sort of lens.

You can see because your eyes are the lenses.

Without a lens, the sensor will only pickup the scattered lights in the ambient, and no light is converged/concentrated into particular areas which can form an image. So without a lens, you cannot define the actual shape of lights that lands on the sensor and so as the dust will not show up.
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Gordon on Sat Sep 30, 2006 6:18 pm

Yi-P wrote:You cannot form an image without any sort of lens.
...


Not quite true- a pinhole or small aperture will form an image with no lens!
Look under a tree during a partial solar eclipse and you will see hundreds of small crescent images of the Sun. There are small round images of the sun normally with no eclipse, but the effect is not so obvious then. A hole the size of a 50c piece in a heavy curtain will form an image of the sunlit outside world on the opposite side of a darkened room too.
I'm sure placing a pinhole over your camera body with no lens will show any dust spots... but I'd recommend using a lens and f/22 ;)

Gordon
D70, D200, CP5700
User avatar
Gordon
Member
 
Posts: 436
Joined: Fri Feb 18, 2005 11:04 pm
Location: Loomberah/Siding Spring Observatory

Postby Yi-P on Sat Sep 30, 2006 6:30 pm

Gordon wrote:
Not quite true- a pinhole or small aperture will form an image with no lens!

Gordon


Ah yes, this is another way to converge light into a point. ;)
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby Laurie on Sat Sep 30, 2006 6:37 pm

i was right. *gasp* shocking
User avatar
Laurie
Senior Member
 
Posts: 679
Joined: Mon Apr 17, 2006 9:46 pm
Location: Mortdale.Sydney/NSW.AU

Postby Link on Sat Sep 30, 2006 6:56 pm

Because of its shape, it certainly looks like dust to me. A careful blow should take care of the long oneat the top, and then you'd be sure it was only dust.

Link.
User avatar
Link
Member
 
Posts: 296
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 6:07 pm
Location: Nowra


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions