Wedding shots finally processed...

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Wedding shots finally processed...

Postby xerubus on Sat Jan 22, 2005 7:43 pm

Good evening all,

As some of you know I shot a wedding a couple of weeks ago... well... i've finally finished processing...

I would love to hear some critique or thoughts about these shots.... the day made me respect what professional wedding photographers actually go through.... Here's a select couple of shots... they have obviously all been resized and quality reduced for easy browsing,
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
kind regards and thanks for comments in advance...
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby ajo43 on Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:24 pm

my favs:

1. The last one on the train tracks. Very original and great composition. Fantastic pp.
2. The second last one. Just a classic well framed and exposed wedding shop.

I'm sure the b&g were very happy with your work. Congrats.
Regards

Jonesy
User avatar
ajo43
Member
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 1:55 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby xerubus on Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:32 pm

Thanks Jonesy..... my favourites are #1 & #8....

the b&g seemed very happy... but their minds are still clouded with romance and the belief that nothing could be bad.. :)
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby redline on Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:44 pm

some great work there,
i don't really shot weddings or people but here what i have to say:
i liked the last shot(reminds me of the cover to swordfish dvd) but the girl to the far right seems out of place, shes not looking the same direction.
was this intendtion?

shots 4+5 kinda lacked emotion maybe a pondering look from the bride in 4?
shot 7, the ladies sign is too much of as distraction.

but i think you still did a good job.
Last edited by redline on Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Life's pretty straight without drifting
http://www.puredrift.com
redline
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1370
Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby xerubus on Sat Jan 22, 2005 8:47 pm

this was at the end of the day and my patience was quite stretched :) i asked for an attitude shot and to be relaxed and just to do their own thing.... everyone looked at the camera apart from the one....
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby johndec on Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:16 pm

Although my abilities pale into insignificance compared to you Mark, I have been through the marriage thing twice :lol: and if I was the client:

1. Lovely use of focus, she'll love it.

2. To me technically excellent, but she'll hate it. Too many chins :)

3. Every bride wants a nice pic of their bouquet.

4,5 & 6. The wall.... They may love them and I know at least one member here has a brickwork fetish :shock: but not to my taste.

7. I can see the artistic point of leaving the "ladies" sign in the pic and I'm sure they are ladies, but everyone who looks at it will know it's a dunny sign... I'd crop it out.

8. Textbook wedding pic, they'll love it. The way the light breaks through under her chin is very flattering.

9. My favourite. Imagination plus!!! Subtitle? "Jesse James gets Married"?.
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby xerubus on Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:22 pm

Thankyou John... i appreciate the time you have taken to give some feedback..... i'm with you... i think the first one is going to be the winner of the shots....

there's something about brickwalls :)

oh dear... i hadn't even noticed the multiple chins.... time to do a little editing :wink:

cheers
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby MHD on Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:28 pm

Love them Mark, Brick wall not exactly to my taste but I love numbers 1 and 8!!!

If you dont mind sharing what proccessing and shooting did you do for those two... they just seem to shine!
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby xerubus on Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:32 pm

thanks mhd....

with number 8 i did the greg gorman b&w conversion with a strong brown tone.... i posted a topic http://forum.d70users.com/viewtopic.php?t=1957 which explains the process....

for number one... it's a secret... let me make a couple of quid first and then i'll post my technique... :)

cheers mate...
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby johndec on Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:37 pm

No probs. If you want a practice run,I'll send you a pic of me, I've got plenty of surplus chins you can practice on :!: :!: :!:
User avatar
johndec
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1327
Joined: Mon Dec 06, 2004 11:24 pm
Location: Sans Souci, Sydney...D200....

Postby JordanP on Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:45 pm

You captured some great images there Xerubus. Like the masses I particularly like 1 and 8. The roses are also presented wonderfully - possibly a nice wedding album cover camo.

The soft look has served well in the images like 1 & 8 but some of the others look like they could be a little sharper.

Brick walls ... always a risk. You did well be didn't quite pull it off IMHO.

The way you have captured the bride and groom rarley looking at the camera has given way to some very high quality shots (again not having seen your entire coverage) you could also mix in a few more shots where they are looking at the camera. Eye contact can be powerful and doesn't need to look cheesy and set up.

Your use of profiles has worked well with this couple (eg No.8 ) - but finding sujects like this can be rare and profile shots are usually unflattering.

Brilliant effort for your first wedding!!!! (this was your first wedding shoot wasn't it?)
Last edited by JordanP on Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:55 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby JordanP on Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:49 pm

xerubus wrote:thanks mhd....

with number 8 i did the greg gorman b&w conversion with a strong brown tone.... i posted a topic http://forum.d70users.com/viewtopic.php?t=1957 which explains the process....

for number one... it's a secret... let me make a couple of quid first and then i'll post my technique... :)

cheers mate...


Are you refering to no.8 - the classic back-lit profile of B&G or no.9 the railway shot when you talk about the B&W conversion?
Craig
User avatar
JordanP
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1050
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Lismore, NSW

Postby xerubus on Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:52 pm

JordanP wrote:
xerubus wrote:thanks mhd....

with number 8 i did the greg gorman b&w conversion with a strong brown tone.... i posted a topic http://forum.d70users.com/viewtopic.php?t=1957 which explains the process....

for number one... it's a secret... let me make a couple of quid first and then i'll post my technique... :)

cheers mate...


Are you refering to no.8 - the classic back-lit profile of B&G or no.9 the railway shot when you talk about the B&W conversion?


ahhh... sorry about that... yes... the railway shot was with the greg gorman process...

no. 8 was done with the same process as no. 1.... :wink:

Craig... thankyou, once again, for your valuable info....

i agree with you on the brick wall... the idea was there, but unfortunately the contrast between the subject and the background was too much....

yes... first wedding shoot.... next one coming up in 4 weeks.. so plenty more planning on my part to come....
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby MHD on Sat Jan 22, 2005 9:57 pm

heheh.. not a prob... Worked well! (vaseline on the filter?) :)
New page
http://www.potofgrass.com
Portfolio...
http://images.potofgrass.com
Comments and money always welcome
User avatar
MHD
Moderator
 
Posts: 5829
Joined: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:51 pm
Location: Chicago Burbs

Postby meicw on Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:09 am

Jee I wish that I could take pictures of people as good as these. I rate them as excellent. They are very refreshing from the normal everyday pics that some photographers produce. My fav is the last one, although I would have placed the bride in front of the points rodding so that one could see the dress fully. And the second last captures the day and the moment beautifully.
Well done
Meic
meicw
Member
 
Posts: 389
Joined: Mon Dec 27, 2004 2:12 pm
Location: Melbourne (Reservoir), Canon 5D

Postby xerubus on Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:25 am

Thankyou meic...
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane

Postby sirhc55 on Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:29 am

xerubus you can be justifiably proud of this shoot. Some very original shots and in particular I like the shot of the bride and two bridsmaids outside the toilet.

Be interesting to clone out women and replace with men!!!

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby xerubus on Sun Jan 23, 2005 10:39 am

thanks Chris... much appreciated....

i can think of a few other things i would like to clone that sign into... :twisted:
http://www.markcrossphotography.com - A camera, glass, and some light.
User avatar
xerubus
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2740
Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 3:33 pm
Location: Nth Brisbane


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques