pbase test - dialup warning / oversize images

Had a play with something interesting? Got something that we all covet? Found a real lemon? Write a few lines about it, and share your experiences.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Pbase - which looks best

Small
0
No votes
Medium
2
15%
Large
8
62%
Very Large
3
23%
 
Total votes : 13

pbase test - dialup warning / oversize images

Postby Justin on Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:06 pm

Four sizes from pbase - please vote to which renders best in your opinion.

Edit: If you are going to trouble yourself to look at this, pleeeez cast a vote or this is a waste of time!!!

Exactly the same photo as the zenfolio test

Image

Image

Image

Image
Last edited by Justin on Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby stubbsy on Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:24 pm

Justin

A comment - I chose large because it fit vertically on my Dell 24" widescreen LCD at work.

I'll also point out that the very large exceeds the forums max 800 pixels guidelines (refer the FAQ)
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Justin on Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:26 pm

Hi Peter, I was aware I would be breaking the rules but thought I could get away with it for the equipment test... I did put in a dialup warning, I'll re-edit to state oversize images as well.
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby stubbsy on Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:31 pm

Justin wrote:Hi Peter, I was aware I would be breaking the rules but thought I could get away with it for the equipment test... I did put in a dialup warning, I'll re-edit to state oversize images as well.

I understood that Justin hence why I didn't say this post was in breach. I was just pointing out that it would be unsuitbale for ongoing use.

Rules are meant to be broken (mostly) where there is a strong case. It makes sense because of what you are doing here to exceed the guidelines (it is a test FFS). Likewise if there were 8 sizes I'd have no problems despite the 4 images guideline. I rpobably should have been less succinct :wink:
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby Justin on Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:37 pm

Yeah absolutely and there-in lyeth the lesson - If Large goes Large in the polling then the next test is to process the picture differently so that the image is true to your personal vision, which is what comes out of your processing, rather than a picture service algorithms interpretation.

Sorry - succinct is fine I did read it that way but just thought I could have done more to highlight this was a break-the-rules post .

Group hug time :lol: :lol: :lol:
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby Sheila Smart on Fri Oct 06, 2006 5:45 pm

A tip: Its not a good idea to have images of the latter size on PBase because they are easily nicked - but I am sure you already knew that :)

Cheers
Sheila
Sheila Smart
Canon 5D and various Ls
Black and White Spider Award 2005 - Photographer of the Year - amateur
On-line Gallery here
Sheila Smart
Member
 
Posts: 477
Joined: Sun Jan 15, 2006 10:20 am
Location: Avalon Beach, NSW

Postby Justin on Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:01 pm

Hi Sheila yes I understand and have recently started uploading at max length 800 and at a slightly lower jpg quality (not enough to affect CRT / LCD viewing).

I do need to get into the habit of sticking a frame and copyright or even just a copyright on my images though.

something like DXO automatically adding a frame and sig would be a good thing
D3 | 18-200VR | 50:1.4 | 28:2.8 | 35-70 2.8 | 12-24 f4
picasaweb.google.com/JustinPhotoGallery
"We don't know and we don't care"
User avatar
Justin
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1089
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 9:32 pm
Location: Newtown, Sydeny

Postby stubbsy on Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:04 pm

Justin wrote:something like DXO automatically adding a frame and sig would be a good thing

You can do that with iMatch - in a batch resize, downsample, create a frame, add a caption & copyright. It will be in my next Chimp article
Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything.
*** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
User avatar
stubbsy
Moderator
 
Posts: 10748
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2004 7:44 pm
Location: Newcastle NSW - D700

Postby mark on Fri Oct 06, 2006 8:13 pm

stubbsy wrote:
Justin wrote:something like DXO automatically adding a frame and sig would be a good thing

You can do that with iMatch - in a batch resize, downsample, create a frame, add a caption & copyright. It will be in my next Chimp article

Looking forward to reading that. :)
User avatar
mark
Member
 
Posts: 410
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2006 3:56 am
Location: Byron Bay | Northern NSW


Return to Equipment Reviews