The Full Frame Wars....

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

The Full Frame Wars....

Postby anubis on Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:00 pm

Have a look at this article guys, well worth a look.

http://www.digitalsecrets.net/secrets/FullFrameWars.html

As you can imagine some forums have imploded or declared war on the "unbelievers" after reading this.

In the end its just someones opinion.
Nikon D300, Nikkors 70-200 VR, 17-55, 50 1.4,18-200 VR etc
User avatar
anubis
Member
 
Posts: 248
Joined: Sat Apr 16, 2005 9:05 pm
Location: Rose Bay

Postby Hybrid on Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:15 pm

I read this yesterday - very interesting indeed. I've always wondered why people were so fantatical about full-frame. :?

Like you say, just opinions...
User avatar
Hybrid
Member
 
Posts: 115
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 11:44 pm
Location: Bundaberg, Queensland

Postby sirhc55 on Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:16 pm

Peter is one of the more sensible gurus around - a very interesting read :)
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Alpha_7 on Sun Oct 22, 2006 2:25 pm

Very entertaining!
User avatar
Alpha_7
Senior Member
 
Posts: 7259
Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2005 6:19 pm
Location: Mortdale - Sydney - Nikon D700, x-D200, Leica, G9

Postby Steffen on Sun Oct 22, 2006 10:33 pm

Anubis, you should have posted this in the Nikon forum. What if Sheila sees this...? :shock: :wink:

Cheers
Steffen.
lust for comfort suffocates the soul
User avatar
Steffen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1931
Joined: Mon Oct 31, 2005 4:52 pm
Location: Toongabbie, NSW

Postby adam on Sun Oct 22, 2006 11:48 pm

Entertaining, yes!
I agree! haha
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
User avatar
adam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: New Caledonia

Postby cyanide on Mon Oct 23, 2006 2:42 am

It's not *quite* the same, but still reminds me of this:

http://www.geocities.com/Buddychai/Misc ... Guage.html


4 Feet, 8 and 1/2 Inches? … A Strange Number; Why?

The U.S. standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That is an exceedingly odd number. Why was that gauge used?

Because that's the way they built them in England, and the U.S. railroads were built by English expatriates. Why did the English build them that way?

Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the pre-railroad tramways, and that's the gauge they used. Why did "they" use that gauge then?

Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they used for building wagons, which used that wheel spacing. So why did the wagons have that particular odd spacing?

Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break on some of the old, long distance roads in England, because that's the spacing of the wheel ruts. So who built those old rutted roads?

The first long distance roads in Europe (and England) were built by Imperial Rome for their legions. The roads have been used ever since. And the ruts in the roads?

Roman war chariots first formed the ruts in the roads, which everyone had to match for fear of destroying their wagon wheels. Since the chariots were made for (or by) Imperial Rome, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing.

The U.S. standard railroad gauge of 4 feet-8.5 inches derives from the original specification for an Imperial Roman war chariot. Specifications and bureaucracies live forever.

So the next time you are handed a specification and wonder what horse's ass came up with it, you may be exactly right, because the Imperial Roman war chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the back end of two war horses.

Thus we have the answer to the original question. Now the twist to the story:

When we see a space shuttle sitting on it's launching pad, there are two booster rockets attached to the side of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRB's. The SRB's are made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah.

The engineers who designed the SRB's might have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRB's had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site. The railroad line from the factory had to run through a tunnel in the mountains.

The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track is about as wide as two horses' behinds.

So, the major design feature of what is arguably the worlds most advanced transportation system was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse's ass!!!

Don't you just love engineering?


Apologies if this is a bit too OT...
Last edited by cyanide on Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:32 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rae
.
All the gear and no idea.
PPOK / Others' pics in my threads OK
cyanide
Member
 
Posts: 426
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2005 4:35 pm
Location: Cairns, QLD

Postby adam on Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:03 am

hahaha I remember that one:) Love it!
---
Equipment: camera body, wide lens, standard lens, telephoto lens, flash
Wish list: skill
User avatar
adam
Senior Member
 
Posts: 633
Joined: Sat Aug 19, 2006 5:27 pm
Location: New Caledonia

Postby Killakoala on Wed Oct 25, 2006 8:43 am

For the facts on the horse's ass-railway story.

http://www.snopes.com/history/american/gauge.htm

I would still like a full-frame DSLR. :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ


Return to General Discussion

cron