DSLRUsers.com

A discussion forum - and more - for users of Digital Single Lens Reflex cameras.

Skip to content

Adobe new RAW file format

Forum rules and nettiquette, along with other items of general interest.

Important information about this forum is contained here, and members MUST familiarise themselves with the posts here, as well as what is contained within the FAQ.

Please do not complain if you ask a question regarding a topic covered here or in the FAQ and in response you get a rather brusque, obtuse or sarcastic response. We get sick and tired of answering the same questions, day in, day out, when the answers are clearly published, in plain view, and all that is required is for you to open your eyes and read them!

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Write comments

Adobe new RAW file format

Postby birddog114 on Tue Sep 28, 2004 6:53 am

http://www.dpreview.com/news/0409/04092711adobe_dng.asp
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney
Top

NDG vs NEF

Postby birddog114 on Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:01 am

I just tried the Adobe NDG and converted some NEFs. Interesting, the final size of the NDG is actually close to 8MB instead of 4 or close..

I am sure I enabled the loseless compression on in NDG converter software..

Am I right on this?
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney
Top

Postby gstark on Tue Sep 28, 2004 7:34 am

I'm seeing file sizes slightly smaller. - 5MB downsizes to 4MB
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW
Top

Postby Onyx on Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:17 am

Maybe it's time I switch back to shooting raw... the only reason I don't is because of this limited compatibility issue. If this new standard takes off - photo printing places would surely be able to read DNG files and won't insist on TIF or JPGs.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au
Top

Postby birddog114 on Tue Sep 28, 2004 8:21 am

Onyx wrote:Maybe it's time I switch back to shooting raw... the only reason I don't is because of this limited compatibility issue. If this new standard takes off - photo printing places would surely be able to read DNG files and won't insist on TIF or JPGs.


Onyx,
Yes, it's new standard and all the cam makers will be heading this way.
I tried few sets early this morning and like it, perhaps will be more good for archiving and storage. Then the storage device's makers will be on full steam mood.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney
Top

Postby sirhc55 on Fri Oct 01, 2004 1:49 pm

An interesting point about the new DNG format.

Downloaded RAW and converted to DNG. Went into browser in Photoshop CS and opened both a DNG and NEF file of the same photo.

On screen the NEF file was a lot cleaner than the DNG without any post processing!
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10
Top
Write comments

Return to Information
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
Copyright © 2005 - 2022 Gary Stark


Portal XL 5.0 ~ Plain 0.2