NIKON D40........ real or hoax

Have your say on issues related to using a DSLR camera.

Moderator: Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

NIKON D40........ real or hoax

Postby big pix on Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:46 am

Cheers ....bp....
Difference between a good street photographer and a great street photographer....
Removing objects that do not belong...
happy for the comments, but
.....Please DO NOT edit my image.....
http://bigpix.smugmug.com Forever changing
User avatar
big pix
Senior Member
 
Posts: 4513
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 11:52 pm
Location: Lake Macquarie NSW.

Postby Yi-P on Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:56 am

An upgraded D50 with a downgraded D80 combined together, sounds interesting...

There were some more humour about Nikon making the announcement in Mid November, just before Christmas to make a big hit on market... Dunno how will this gonna be...
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby DaveB on Fri Nov 03, 2006 11:59 am

Since when has Nikon been known to announce a new DSLR and be able to ship appreciable numbers of units in under a month?
User avatar
DaveB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1850
Joined: Wed Aug 31, 2005 10:57 pm
Location: Box Hill, Vic

Postby Yi-P on Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:03 pm

DaveB wrote:Since when has Nikon been known to announce a new DSLR and be able to ship appreciable numbers of units in under a month?


:lol: They can never produce enough to meet the demands...
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield

Postby bwhinnen on Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:37 pm

Sounds just like the whole 40D (Canon) rumour and photokina that was just going around...
User avatar
bwhinnen
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2004 11:12 am
Location: Cornubia, Brisbane

Postby Glen on Fri Nov 03, 2006 12:48 pm

Bernie, interesting. There certainly would be a market for a camera which doesn't end up using anything more than the 1 or 2 kit lenses which came with it.


Dave B, how right you are :wink:
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Nnnnsic on Fri Nov 03, 2006 2:31 pm

If that's a fake, that Photoshopper knows what he's doing.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Killakoala on Fri Nov 03, 2006 2:41 pm

It makes sense to me.

Nikon have said time and again that it is trying to gain more market share in the low end market so a true entry-level camera with NIKON branding will fit very well in the entry-level stakes, with Pentax, Olympus and now Sony etc. I always felt the D50 was aimed a little bit too high for Nikon to be competitive with those cameras.

Still, it could also be another good fake. :)
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby gstark on Fri Nov 03, 2006 3:05 pm

DaveB wrote:Since when has Nikon been known to announce a new DSLR and be able to ship appreciable numbers of units in under a month?


Actually,

The D80 is suprisingly available. No shortages in HK, at any rate.
g.
Gary Stark
Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff
The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
User avatar
gstark
Site Admin
 
Posts: 22918
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2004 11:41 pm
Location: Bondi, NSW

Postby Underload on Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:34 pm

This is just a thought...happy for it to be found wrong or illogical :wink:

If the D40 exists, and does become a production model, have Nikon made a potential mistake in using a 6mp chip? I mean, it probably helps keep the manufacturing cost down (rather than sourcing a 7 or 8mp unit)- so that might ameliorate some of the disadvantage.

What I mean is, the D40 would be a camera pitched at people getting into photography, a cheaper alternative. However, some of the people upgrading to it from a p&s, or just buying it outright as their first camera have that real mentality about more mp=omg...better camera.

Maybe as a purchaser, they'd have a hard time justifying it when the p&s market moves on to higher mp counts? Some people might not 'get' the idea of a dslr.
User avatar
Underload
Member
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Sat Aug 26, 2006 12:32 am
Location: Brisbane Northside

Postby moz on Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:11 pm

It's that time of year... we're heading towards the Christmas spending spree and the beta test phase for the "spring" show hardware. I have the usual FOAF rumors coming in, one guy who swears he has actually seen a 1DsIII and some new glass to go with it. Whether that will turn out to be true I dunno, but 23.9MP full frame does sounds good (unless, of course, you're a PhaseOne victim. I mean, customer).

personally I'm just hoping it drives the price of the 1DII and 1DsII down in the second hand market to the point where I can afford to buy one. Or one of each if I trip over a $10k note ijn the street.
http://www.moz.net.nz
have bicycle, will go to Critical Mass
User avatar
moz
Senior Member
 
Posts: 937
Joined: Fri Mar 17, 2006 6:50 pm
Location: Coburg, Melbun.

Postby MCWB on Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:14 pm

Underload wrote:Some people might not 'get' the idea of a dslr.

I think that this is aimed at those who do get it (had film SLRs etc) but have been put off by the sheer $$$ in the past. Let's face it, you used to be able to buy entry-level film SLRs around $500 yeah? DSLRs haven't been in that ballpark yet; maybe the D40 is a push towards that sort of market.
User avatar
MCWB
Senior Member
 
Posts: 2121
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2004 10:55 pm
Location: Epping/CBD, Sydney-D200, D70

Postby Glen on Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:23 pm

Trent, spot on. I have given two F401 as gifts in the past, and would love to give my godson a DSLR, but when I bought him a camera the D70 was the lowest. I bought him a digital P&S instead. I would have jumped at a D40 for say $850 kit.
User avatar
Glen
Moderator
 
Posts: 11819
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 3:14 pm
Location: Sydney - Neutral Bay - Nikon

Postby Nnnnsic on Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:42 pm

moz wrote:Whether that will turn out to be true I dunno, but 23.9MP full frame does sounds good


I'd heard 22.

(unless, of course, you're a PhaseOne victim. I mean, customer)


You've obviously never had the pleasure of using one. :wink:
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby bumthology on Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:36 am

i have the d40
my first dslr camera
must say its pretty good
i mean having a dslr.
bumthology
Member
 
Posts: 77
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 4:16 am
Location: Adelaide CBD, SA

Postby Yi-P on Sat Mar 03, 2007 11:39 am

Its fun to read back posts from several months ago and compare to what really happened today. :lol:

Congrats on your new camera bumthology, you gonna love it :D
User avatar
Yi-P
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3579
Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 1:12 am
Location: Sydney -- Ashfield


Return to General Discussion