Nikon "5D" Full FrameModerator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Nikon "5D" Full Framereading dpreview, I see the Canon 5D is a fullframe, 1.0FOV crop. Surely Nikon are not far away???
I'm looking to upgrade from my D70, to a D200, or D2, and wondering if another is on the horizon (I know there always is with technology, but wanted to ask this group, as I'd hate to spend coin and then a D3-full-frame come out the next month). I'm thinking 10+MP. Large Pro / Vertical Grip as I have big mitts, and primarily shoot in portrait. Anyone bear news on the Nikon full frame front? thanks, Oz
Hi Oz,
Nikon have been claiming for quite a while that they are not planning a full frame sensor camera. Go the D200 with the MB-D200 verticle grip, you won't regret it. That's what I upgraded to from the D70. It's such a pleasure of a camera to use. Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Oz
The full frame Nikon question pops up here frequently from time to time. Here are a two recent ones from a quick search (I used Nikon AND full AND frame) http://www.dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php?t=22271 http://www.dslrusers.com/viewtopic.php?t=21439 Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
The D2X (or d200 for that matter) is a camera used by many very good (and for that matter very well paid) photographers...
Until I am equal or better than them I will not be concerned about having a full frame system... At the d70 suits my needs but as soon as I can afford it I will be upgrading to a d200 and then it will be the fleshware behind the camera that will need an upgrade! New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
if you want FF, jump to canon otherwise you'll forever be waiting. If you just shoot portraits and bugger all landscapes, there's not much advantage b/ween FF and 1.5x. Heck be thankful that the Nikon cameras don't have 1.67x
Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
You're not alone Oz. Many of us wait patiently for a Nikon FF.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
They will work, but with severe vignetting in some cases. Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 | Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
It's not a "catch", but a design constraint. DX cameras don't require as large an image circle be projected by the lens when compared with FF bodies. Consequently, DX cameras have been designed to be smaller, lighter, and to only project that smaller image circle. You buy a DX lens with the knowledge (or you should) that it is designed to not work on a FF camera. In the Canon world, the euivalent lenses don't even work on FF bodies because, again, of certain design issues. If you believe that you will be using lenses on both FF and DX cameras, then your buying choices should be limited to those lenses that work on FF cameras only. g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
Previous topic • Next topic
11 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|