A collection of photos found on my computer...Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
A collection of photos found on my computer...For my first submission, instead of going out and taking photos (oh crap its hot) I thought I'd take the lazy option of posting a couple of photos taken long ago that I found on my computer.
On with the photos: #1 #2 A note on these two images. They were scanned from a F60 film (remember that stuff?) SLR. However, they look alot different from the developed versions. In gerneral, the scanner has made them alot flatter (particularly #1) and the colour and tone is different by some margin. I tried to correct this in PS but it only seemed to make it worse (read: artificial) #3 #4 These two are from a Nikon CP3700 P&S digital. Its almost completely auto controlled which leaves little for creativity. cont...
Am I right in assuming you can only include 4 images per post?
Finally, #5 http://users.bigpond.net.au/limau/b&w1jpg.jpg <- IMG tags won't work This was taken in a school photography class with god knows what equipment. I developed the film, photo myself. While an interesting learning experience, I don't think I'll ever develop another roll of film again. The laborious and repetitive nature would annoy me very quickly. All comments are welcome.
DiZZ. You're right, but I like a challenge (=I need a life ). Did a little experimenting. Seems the & isn't liked. Replaced it with %26 which in HTML speak (or hex ASCII - take your pick) is the same as a &. See your pic embedded below. Now I'll never use a & in a filename again. Edit: Forgot to mention. I also really like #3. Very creative. Cheers Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
DiZZ
One other point. Be mindfull of your audience. While I, like many here, have broadband there are a lot who still use modems. These files are way too large to be embedding (eg the last one weighs in around 1Mb). I try to keep my pics no more than 200K and resize them in PS to be at most 1000 pixels on the widest dimension plus I use jpg to compress. That way they'll load heaps faster and we get to see your work that little sooner. For more discussion on this see the poll & discussion inthis thread. Cheers Peter
Disclaimer: I know nothing about anything. *** smugmug galleries: http://www.stubbsy.smugmug.com ***
Thanks for the comments everyone.
Stubbsy, I'll try and be more wary of image sizes in the future. As I'm sure you know, theres a trade off between image size and quality against file sizes, the settings I chose were the best for each image while keeping sizes what I considered reasonable. I have no idea why the b&w one is more than a meg. I'm thinking I forgot to convert it to grey scale before saving.
Previous topic • Next topic
7 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|