Portrait from the other dayModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Portrait from the other dayI took this semi candid shot the other day whilst at a friends place...I liked how it turned out. Critique welcomed
Taken on the kit lens, 1/500th second (manual mode), focal length 70mm, appeture F5, auto white balance. ISO 200.
Geoff,
Very good, but I'd like to have seen the flash toned down a tad - look at the shadow under the subject's chin. Maybe -0.7 ?? Also - and I'd be interested in hearing the comments of others on this - for shooting kids, I'd always been taught that you should include their hands, and I think that in this image the inclusion of the hands may have made for a more complete image. Perhaps a part of this may also be the angle that you've shot this on? It looks to me as if you're a little bit above (certainly no lower than) the child's eye level, and thus you seem to be looking down. So perhaps a slightly lower angle of view? g.
Gary Stark Nikon, Canon, Bronica .... stuff The people who want English to be the official language of the United States are uncomfortable with their leaders being fluent in it - US Pres. Bartlet
mmm... agree with Gary regarding the flash... reducing the underchinshadow would be an improvement (not that I think it's really that bad).
Including hands is a little more complicated... without the subject raising his hands you would have to expand the frame, presenting an entirely different photo, and maybe a less desirable background in the bargain. As for the angle... many articles I have read suggest that shot from up high presents an image of vunerability for kids and is desirable... on the other hand an angle of view more at their level can be quite interesting I think. At the end of the day, these kind of photos are often heavily dictated by what the subject is doing and what their surrounds are. Michael.
Hi Geoff
I agree with Gary and Mj on this especially the lower angle. In the old days (notice I did not say ’good’) the art of photographing children was to use a wide angle lens with pre-set distance and stop and get low. This was generally for groups of kids. On you portrait the exposure looks good and focussing - it’s just the angle Chris Chris
-------------------------------- I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
I really like this shot. I am drawn to his eyes and didn't even notice the shadow under the chin until Gary pointed it out (I have so much to learn!). I agree that the colour picture is better. He has such gorgeous coloured hair.
Marvin... can't agree with you re the learning comment... if you didn't notice the shadow then it's probably not so much of a flaw... sometimes we can over evaluate a picture and you can just about find something to pick on in every shot.
Michael.
All of the above points are useful and can enhance an image. I think eye contact can also increas the power in an image. Ask the model to look directly into the lens and "click". Also...a good practice is to avoid photographing a subject from the position in which it is usually seen. In this sense a lower point of view would add some interest to an already nice shot. Not rules....just tools.
Regards
Matt. K
Catch lights are great!
I also dont really like the B&W... [/url] New page
http://www.potofgrass.com Portfolio... http://images.potofgrass.com Comments and money always welcome
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|