Egret - Mangrove StalkerModerators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators
Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent. Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature. Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread. Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Egret - Mangrove StalkerSnapped this guy wandering around the foreshore at Wynnum.
http://www.pixspot.com/displayimage.php?album=random&cat=10038&pos=-901 Nikkor 70-300 G 1/320 @ f/5.3 ISO200 WB: Cloudy Exp Comp: +0.3EV Spot Metering No PP apart from cropping and cloning out an ugly piece of rubbish floating just in front of his beak. Any comments or advice? Simon. Last edited by Manta on Thu Jan 27, 2005 8:46 am, edited 1 time in total.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Thanks Dee, I was lucky - but I'd like another crack at it to at least have a chance to focus!
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
G'day,
I find white birds like this are really hard to expose for, I always seem to struggle with them... Looks like the lighting would have made it difficult too, was it shot raw? I'd be tempted to try a little less exposure on the bird to try and get more feather detail and lightening the darker areas to bring the beak out a bit more (PS curves?)... Like the Rosella(?) shot, the two on the side seem to be keeping an eye on you, while the other has taken off... Good timing... Cheers, Mudder Aka Andrew
Thanks Mudder, I'll take your points on board.
At this stage, all of my bird shots are pretty haphazard affairs as I'm basically just doing some VERY quick adjustments before firing off the shutter. I'm sure things will become more intuitive with time and experience. The rainbow lorikeets are a subject I can work on, as they turn up every afternoon at the home of a friend, but the egret was only there for such a fleeting instant before he took off o I had to act fast. Unfortunately, there were too many branches around to get a clear in-flight shot. Yes, it was shot in RAW, but I'm thinking of going back to JPEG Fine until I hone my technique some more. Thanks for taking the time to look at the photos; it IS appreciated. Simon. Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
G'day, One of the reasons I shoot raw is so I can fix up my stuff-ups later in PP, especially using what seems like additional exposure latitude raw seems to offer (edit: ) when doing the PP afterwards... Maybe other members could correct me (as I certainly aint experienced or skilled at this stuff) but I thought shooting jpeg would actually make getting the exposure etc spot-on more critical when taking the pic as there wasn't as much "recover-ability" with JPEG (edit: ) when doing PP later... Experienced dudes please????????? Cheers, Mudder Aka Andrew
Manta
It's a very good shot but it's a bit small for critical viewing. Could I suggest a little less frame and a little more image? It will give your images more impact. Regards
Matt. K
You may certainly suggest that Matt and I'll keep it in mind. Got a bit carried away with the razzle-dazzle and forgot about the substance... Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
Previous topic • Next topic
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|