All forum members should have a crack at this.Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. All forum members should have a crack at this.Regards
Matt. K
I find this clause interesting:
22 - In consideration of Moran accepting the entry into the MCPP, the entrant consents, and Moran reserves the right, to reproduce all entries received in all publications and publicity for the MCPP, inclusive of all electronic/digital or print media. Moran is not liable to pay the entrant any fee, royalty or other form of remuneration for this right. They can use your image(s) even if you don't win.
Thanks Matt, I will.
Beetleboy - I guess for some this would seem a bit rude and imposing on behalf of the organisers, but I'm sure there are just as many others that would be delighted at the opportunity to have their photo used irrespective of winning a prize. Edit: I just noticed this I am going to let Sam, (my 8 year old son) have a go too. Mark
Wetlens
I understand your point of view Mark but at the end of the day these companies often build large photo libraries from these competitions. If they have $60,000 to give away as prize money, what's stopping them from hiring a pro and keeping us photog's employed?!
The AIPP and ACMP both agree that these kinds of clauses are detrimental to the photography industry. I'm all for this company running a competition, choosing some finalists and awarding them..why must they have the right to use ALL entries as they see fit? Sorry to take this thread but this is a hot topic!
Been collating my entries and trying to cut them back to 10 images as per the limit. Luckily for me I'll qualify for the "Secondary" competition muhaha; no entry fee.
For $17k they can have any of my shots, at a shot at $17k and the glory, granting them licensing doesn't sound that bad.
This must be a very tough challenge!!
So many photographers around and 10 per each for the Open season, that is thousands of great photographs to be rated.
There was an article in Capture mag a while ago (if I recall) that talked about the problems of comps which allow the organisers permanent and free use of entrants' photos. The basic argument was that these comps are basically a means of stocking libraries.
(Bear in mind I have no experience with any photo competitions whatsoever). P
I must admit, I'm now in the camp that has a problem with this sort of comp, due to what's already been mentioned here. Sure, someone wins but, in the final washup, it's photographers that are the ultimate losers, IMHO. It's like flooding the market with a cheap product that others are trying to sell for a reasonable price. To me, it devalues the legitimate work of professional shooters. Cheap stock photo sites do the same thing. Just my thoughts.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
LOL, Manta, just like dumping in customs . Couldn't agree more, though... Alex
Of course, this may be intended as the limited proposition to use the images in promoting future competitions (not for any and all uses). Clause 10 specifies that more clearly for prize-winning entries, but the wording in clause 22 isn't as clear as I would like. It's not necessarily as evil as you might be assuming... Maybe it's evil intent, maybe it's just stupidity... If you don't like it, contact them and query them as to the intent of clause 22 (why have it when they already have clause 10?).
Liam - You have misinterpreted this clause. This clause relates to the use of images to promote the MCPP (Moran Contemporary Photographic Prize) only and as such should be considered fair play. You might like to read the terms & conditions of entry for The Archibald Prize which are not dissimilar in nature. There is no way you could interpret this to mean they will use the images to create a stock library, as they exclude this by stating
I'm more inclined to believe the reason for this prize is more related to the following quotes from their web pages.
$80,000 expenditure to create a stock library for a Health Care group with less than a dozen photos on their own web site, all of which look to have been taken by a professional photographer that they most likely paid for. I simply don't believe it and neither should you. Now back to the original topic, I couldn't agree more with Matt's Subject line.
Mark
Wetlens
You are correct Mark. I did misinterpret the clause as I wrongly assumed MCPP to be the coporate body and not the competition. Thank you for pointing that out.
So by what you're saying; they will only use images entered to promote the competition? I can't say I have a big issue with that since it's unlikely to be more than a handful of pic's. I'm reconsidering. I might enter now! And in future I'll attempt to make a better effort of interpreting the rules
Got me too Mark. I'll admit my cursory scan missed some salient points. Thanks for pointing out the differences.
Simon
D300 l MB-D10 l D70 l SB-800 l 70-200 VR l TC 17-E l 18-70 f3.5-4.5 l 70-300 f4-5.6 l 50 f1.4 l 90 Macro f2.8 l 12-24 f4 http://www.redbubble.com/people/manta
I refuse to enter the competitions that conduct business like this. Its a rort. Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
I hope many did. BTW, and not wanting to influence anyone one way or another, but do you know anything about Doug Moran and the Moran Group?
Doug Moran is one of those characters, like Lang Hancock and Kerry Packer, where it's hard to know where truth ends and fiction starts. Just Google him and read. It's an eye-opener. TFF (Trevor)
My History Blog: Your Brisbane: Past & Present My Photo Blog: The Foto Fanatic Nikon stuff!
Had a quick read after your suggestion cricketfan - very interesting; seems there was an Australian Story about him in 2003..
http://www.abc.net.au/austory/content/2003/s932900.htm
Yep - I submitted my 10 Photos into the Secondary Category. Actually spoke to the organiser Danielle Nolan (IT issues). Two interesting points cropped up in conversation a) The Moran portrait prize has been running for ages; the photography prize however is in its inaugural year. Might explain the lack of photography on the site and the lack of "past winner". b) In relation to the copyright concerns - the point mark picked up on was confirmed by Danielle. If the image becomes a finalist it will be used only to promote the MCPP and the competition. The finalist are announced later next week (around the 8th) so hopefully my $17 000 cheque will be on its way by the 15th
You lucky bugger Ronnie! I wanted to enter 8 images but the open section costs $25 per entry so I only entered 1!!
I also spoke to Danielle cos my credit card transaction failed and the site had no means of me attempting it again! Hoping my $40,000 cheque will be in the mail soon
Received a call today from Danielle; 3 of my shots were selected as finalists for the secondary division Absolutely stoked with that, scrambling now to get the stuff printed and delivered in time to the Moran group.
Err, the photos that they ended up choosing.
The Usual Suspects; Sydney, NSW. October 2006 Palm Beach, NSW. December 2006 Anonymous Consumerism; Melbourne, VIC. December 2006
Good luck mate - that is great for you that you have been selected as a finalist!
Steve (Nikon D200/D700)
My photography website http://wwphoto.redbubble.com/ My photo blog http://www.redbubble.com/people/wwphoto Please feel free to offer any constructive criticism on my works
Excellent Stuff Ronnie, I had a feeling you'd do well, but 3 IS OUTSTANDING!!!!
Got my fingers and toes crossed for you... hmmm any thoughts on what you'd spend the prize money on if you won ?
:O; just an update - the first image at Town Hall Station has been shortlisted to the Top 5 by the judges. Received a call from the Moran Group yesterday and they'll be flying me into Sydney next week for the gallery opening and press conference on the 13th!
1/5 shot at the big money, pretty stoked Hopefully if I spend the (Adelaide) long weekend there, I'll try and meetup with some of the Sydney dSLRUsers folk
Congratulations Ronza, whether you win or lose at this point Top 5, is massive and very well deserved. Congratulations!
So I've just come downstairs from the State Library - the press conference just took place to announce the winners. While the official results are "media embargo'ed" until 6PM, tune into the 7.30 Report or the ABC News this evening and you might see me
Im at the opening now - ducked out of the gallery from boredom and tension (no one knows the results and we can't say anything).
Amazing result Ronza,
congrats on winning, just caught you on the ABC News, bloody fantastic, André Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
34k, Nice work Ronza well done, I really liked that shot the first time you posted it, nice little earner for you, well done!
It's actually only $17k to Ronza and $17k to his school.
Didn't Canon announce a new camera recently Photography, as a powerful medium of expression and communications, offers an infinite variety of perception, interpretation and execution. Ansel Adams
(misc Nikon stuff)
Mate well done....a great image..well deserved and as the old saying goes.."you gotta be in it to win it..." Again well done...
I hadn't been following this thread, so I was surprised to see you on the ABC news. Well done. Fantastic result. Well deserved. Daniel Nikon D4, D2Xs, D70, Nikkors and Sigmas lenses from 10 to 400mm
www.DSAimages.com
|