70-300 or 80-200

Newer members often state that they think their question is too basic, or stupid, or whatever, to be posted. Nothing could be further further from the truth in any section at DSLRUsers.com, but especially here. Don't feel intimidated. The only stupid question is the one that remains unasked. We were all beginners at one stage, and even the most experienced amongst us will admit to learning new stuff on a daily basis. Ask away! Please also refer to the forum rules and the portal page

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is. Please also check the portal page for more information on this.

70-300 or 80-200

Postby Slaggie on Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:07 am

When the great day comes; the 70-300 4.5-5.6 OR the 80-200 4.5-5.6 plus teleconverter.
Mostley scenery, maybe birding, grandkids at stage shows etc, tractor musiums etc.
Because I use Photoshop, A smallish 200 mm or so telephoto with a converter to get it out there is another possibility
Price is a factor, must be <700 and I wont carry around a big heavy bag. (been there done that)
Are there other options out there with Nikon lenses that I havent thought of? Leaning to 70-300, but could use input.
Geo. :)
Slaggie
Newbie
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 5:40 am
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada

Re: 70-300 or 80-200

Postby birddog114 on Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:14 am

Slaggie wrote:When the great day comes; the 70-300 4.5-5.6 OR the 80-200 4.5-5.6 plus teleconverter.
Mostley scenery, maybe birding, grandkids at stage shows etc, tractor musiums etc.
Because I use Photoshop, A smallish 200 mm or so telephoto with a converter to get it out there is another possibility
Price is a factor, must be <700 and I wont carry around a big heavy bag. (been there done that)
Are there other options out there with Nikon lenses that I havent thought of? Leaning to 70-300, but could use input.
Geo. :)


Slaggie,
If this is your wish then the only lens you can achieve is the 70-300.
The 80-200 is 2.8 not 4.5 or the 80-400VR is 4.5, you only can use the Tamron TC on the 80-400VR but it won't give you any benefit in doing this same as for the 70-300.
You have to do more research on using lenses with TC.
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby Slaggie on Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:49 am

The full handle of the len I was referring to is
AF Nikkor 80-200 mm F 4.5-5.6 D see on website
http://www.bythom.com/80200ens.htm
Light weight, smallish in size, not too expensive. And your right, I have not even thought to ask if it will go on a teleconverter, I thought all lenses would go on the converters.
Geo. :)
Slaggie
Newbie
 
Posts: 16
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2005 5:40 am
Location: Victoria B.C. Canada

Postby birddog114 on Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:06 am

Slaggie wrote:The full handle of the len I was referring to is
AF Nikkor 80-200 mm F 4.5-5.6 D see on website
http://www.bythom.com/80200ens.htm
Light weight, smallish in size, not too expensive. And your right, I have not even thought to ask if it will go on a teleconverter, I thought all lenses would go on the converters.
Geo. :)


:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
You find one of them brand new/ never used "Nikon AF Nikkor 80-200 mm F 4.5-5.6 D" I'll pay you good dollars CASH fresh green bills :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney

Postby birddog114 on Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:20 am

The 80-200 f/4.5 was released in 1995 / filter size 52mm.
I have all information of this lens, if you need, pls. PM
Birddog114
VNAF, My Beloved Country and Airspace
User avatar
birddog114
Senior Member
 
Posts: 15881
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 8:18 pm
Location: Belmore,Sydney


Return to Absolute Beginners Questions