[LOST] Noise at ISO 1600Moderator: Moderators
Forum rules
Please ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
[LOST] Noise at ISO 1600Just received the 5D today and boy am I going to love this beast
It's not as different to the Nikon system as I expected - already getting the hang of it But shame on you Canon for not providing LCD protectors So where's the noise at ISO 1600 I ask? Wayyyy off in the distant history now Link to 100% crop Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Re: [LOST] Noise at ISO 1600
It's down around the boots in that shot. Can't you see all that horrible colour noise? Oh yeah, maybe my standards are different as I've been with Canon for a while.
I don't get it, is this a Nikon or a Canon shot? There's plenty of noise visible in the 100% image.
Here's a full-size of a shot I took of my room back in January http://www.dotnet.org/dslrusers/flowstone-full.jpg D2H, ISO 1600, the only PP was WB adjust and a bit of sharpening. No Noise Ninja (in fact, this was "developed" in Aperture). Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
There is HEAP of noise in that? My understanding is that Nikon have alot of Luma noise/canon colour noise. That looks really bad
I'll be doing a comparison this weekend b/ween the D2Xs and the 5D - will be interesting to see what happens at the high ISO settings
One thing I've noticed about the 5D, there's less twiddling around with the options before you start shooting. Pretty much had the camera ready for me to use within half an hour. I kind of miss having heaps of options Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
being a noob still to DSLR's and having a D40 (which i would NOT replace for a D50)
i'm not sure if you were being sarcastic in your post. Personally i do see a lot of noise,
Sorry if the initial post was misunderstood - yes indeed it was a tad tongue in cheek
Here's the 100% crop of same settings for the D2Xs No I didn't manipulate the curves to bring out more noise. I did do curve manipulation on both shots to get a decent exposure and the 5D still came out with a lot less noise. I'll take a few shots under more favourable conditions at high ISO over the weekend and see how the shots go. Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
your lucky
now you have the best from both worlds the canon though does handle noise better this is realtive to exposure though but in direct comparisson to the d2x 5d is much better at noise handling enjoy the 5d
The noise in the d2x shot is terrible Wayne. I'd better stick with my d200.
Cheers John D3, D300, 14-24/2.8, 24-70/2.8, 85/1.4, 80-400VR, 18-200VR, 105/2.8 VR macro, Sigma 150/2.8 macro
http://www.johndarguephotography.com/
Wow, that D2x must be defective (you should have waited with this picture until the camera was sold ). I get better results from my webcam at dim lighting...
Or was the shot underexposed by two stops and then pulled back up? Cheers Steffen. lust for comfort suffocates the soul
Wow, massive difference between the D2X and 5D
Welcome to the 5D club - enjoy 5D | 16-35L | 35L | 85L | 135L | 70-200F2.8IS | 580EX
My Blog - http://www.allkris.com My Flickr - http://www.flickr.com/photos/dastrix My Website - http://www.kriskeen.com.au
Wayne,
Let me get this straight you have a D2X & a Canon 5D Have you won Lotto lately & can I have a loan if this is the case Enjoy your tinkering with both beasts How I wish I had money & time on my hands Mic
Mic - I wish I had won the lottery. Alas I'm giving up the Nikon gear to fund the switch over to Canon
Just to clarify and prevent any misintepretations, this post and pic comparisons are not there to bash Nikon. Nikon are a bloody awesome system but it does not meet my requirements anymore hence my move. It was a painful decision for me to make the switch especially after having worked so hard to get to the D2Xs, I likened it as to having to end a relationship. But it had to be done as I really felt I was being limited by the abilities of the Nikon cameras. I was already there with their top model and I still had the issue with high ISO noise and I couldn't go anywhere else. Indeed I could persevere and wait it out until they get it right, but in the process potentially missing out on a number of opportunities due to a technical limitation. There are many valid points to debate this point, however the choice has been made I really do appreciate Nikons and always will as it has led me to where I am today. I am not switching to Canon in bitterness but the experience has really shown me that there's a lot more to photography equipment than when I was solely concentrating on Nikon. I may pickup Nikon again in the future, who knows. There's no reason why someone can't have both Nikon and Canon gear to be able to use one or the other to suit different situations. Have fun shooting all and I look forward to posting more photos in the future. Will put some up from my Japan and Vanuatu trip soon. Cheers, Wayne Hassy, Leica, Nikon, iPhone
Come follow the rabbit hole...
Thats your call Wayne & a good one.
Very interesting, very interesting indeed ! Look forward to your new experience with Canon Mic.
Previous topic • Next topic
16 posts
• Page 1 of 1
|