Warning - You may not like what you see!

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

Warning - You may not like what you see!

Postby yeocsa on Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:47 pm

Extreme macro. Subject is approx. 3mm by 1mm.

First attempt. I have no idea what is the magnification.

D70 + Ext. tube 25 + TC1.4X + reverse 50mm + SB800

Exposure: 1/500 at f8, Flash manual 1/16. ASA 400

Manual focus and handheld.

1. What you see thru viewfinder.
Image

2. Picture at 100%. Cropped to fit 800 by 600.
Image

I am sorry if it cause any unpleasant ...
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby mudder on Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:53 pm

I have no idea what the heck it is, but it still looks creepy anyway!

Amazing macro given the thing's size... Wow... If the bug is only 3mm long, the DOF is incredibly short/narrow, must be tricky trying to get focus on the right "bit".

Cheers,
Mudder
Aka Andrew
User avatar
mudder
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3020
Joined: Fri Oct 29, 2004 5:58 pm
Location: Melbourne - Burwood East

Postby Nnnnsic on Mon Jan 31, 2005 7:54 pm

I like it, it's just the lack of DOF that's annoying about it... looking from the head to the abdomen is slightly confusing as the eye sees something completely detailed and in focus to something blurry and hard to interpret.
Producer & Editor @ GadgetGuy.com.au
Contributor for fine magazines such as PC Authority and Popular Science.
User avatar
Nnnnsic
I'm a jazz singer... so I know what I'm doing
 
Posts: 7770
Joined: Sun Aug 08, 2004 12:29 am
Location: Cubicle No. 42... somewhere in Bondi, NSW

Postby Matt. K on Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:02 pm

yeocsa
Not bad. But whenever you do this sort of macro...you have to use f/22 or the smallest f/stop you've got. That's priority no 1.
Great attempt and I know we are going to see some great macros from you....because not many people use a lens reversed. In fact, not many people even know about reversed lenses.
Regards

Matt. K
User avatar
Matt. K
Former Outstanding Member Of The Year and KM
 
Posts: 9981
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 7:12 pm
Location: North Nowra

Thanks.

Postby yeocsa on Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:13 pm

Thanks for the encouragement. I need to use an older lens that is easy to turn the apeture ring. I could see the subject at f8. The moment i try to stop down, i moved focus point and it is so dark thru the viewfinder that it is impossible to focus. I did try at f11 but could not get the focus. Maybe the solution would be to use a tripod.

cheers,

Arthur
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby Killakoala on Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:06 pm

I am warned, i look, i like.

Sensational.

It's a beautiful bug. I see you focussed on its eyes too, a job i would expect to be quite difficult with the lens reveresed process too. Is your second lens a 50mm?
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ

Postby Greg B on Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:53 pm

Great work Arthur. I would love to see the reversed lens in action - I have a couple of lenses from other cameras which would reverse nicely, and although my main lens lust thrust is currently the 105 macro (or 150 but it is a lot dearer), I would still be interested in the more arcane techniques.

Maybe a Melbourne meet with emphasis on some macro action (in addition to the reds of course - mudder, are you there mudder?)
Greg - - - - D200 etc

Talent hits a target no one else can hit; Genius hits a target no one else can see.
- Arthur Schopenhauer
User avatar
Greg B
Moderator
 
Posts: 5938
Joined: Fri Sep 03, 2004 7:14 pm
Location: Surrey Hills, Melbourne

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:04 am

Nikon 200m Micro or Tamron 180 are the 2 best macro lens around - better than Sigma.
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne

Re: Hi

Postby sirhc55 on Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:27 am

yeocsa wrote:Nikon 200m Micro or Tamron 180 are the 2 best macro lens around - better than Sigma.


Ahem - I use the Sigma 105 and like very much what it can do - but that aside your pics are great but had to chuckle when I saw your specs. Arthur, you must be an old film guy - 400ASA :wink:

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Nicole on Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:02 pm

Maybe a Melbourne meet with emphasis on some macro action (in addition to the reds of course - mudder, are you there mudder?)


What about checking out the botanical gardens one weekend...

Flowers, insects etc.
Nicole
Web Site
Nicole
Senior Member
 
Posts: 569
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:54 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby bago100 on Wed Feb 02, 2005 9:07 pm

Excellent shot of the whatyamacallit but considering it is handheld
Well done Yeocsa
The cropped shot is much better because you have eliminated much of the DOF foreground problems
Cheers and well done
Graham
User avatar
bago100
Senior Member
 
Posts: 862
Joined: Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:42 pm
Location: Shanghai China until Feb 2010

Hi

Postby yeocsa on Thu Feb 03, 2005 9:55 am

Thanks everyone. Yeah, I would like to go Botanical Garden for macro and bird photography.
yeocsa
Senior Member
 
Posts: 966
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 12:04 pm
Location: Melbourne


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques