test 50mm 1.8

Got a thin skin? Then look elsewhere. Post a link to an image that you've made, and invite others to offer their critiques. Honesty is encouraged, but please be positive in your constructive criticism. Flaming and just plain nastiness will not be tolerated. Please note that this is not an area for you to showcase your images, nor is this a place for you to show-off where you have been. This is an area for you to post images so that you may share with us a technique that you have mastered, or are trying to master. Typically, no more than about four images should be posted in any one post or thread, and the maximum size of any side of any image should not exceed 950 px.

Moderators: Greg B, Nnnnsic, Geoff, Glen, gstark, Moderators

Forum rules
Please note that image critiquing is a matter of give and take: if you post images for critique, and you then expect to receive criticism, then it is also reasonable, fair and appropriate that, in return, you post your critique of the images of other members here as a matter of courtesy. So please do offer your critique of the images of others; your opinion is important, and will help everyone here enjoy their visit to far greater extent.

Also please note that, unless you state something to the contrary, other members might attempt to repost your image with their own post processing applied. We see this as an acceptable form of critique, but should you prefer that others not modify your work, this is perfectly ok, and you should state this, either within your post, or within your signature.

Images posted here should conform with the general forum guidelines. Image sizes should not exceed 950 pixels along the largest side (height or width) and typically no more than four images per post or thread.

Please also ensure that you have a meaningful location included in your profile. Please refer to the FAQ for details of what "meaningful" is.

test 50mm 1.8

Postby aprilfool on Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:37 pm

here you go with one of my photo taken with nikkor 50mm 1.8

Image

I waiting for your constructive comments.
Nikon D70
AF-S DX 18-70mm f3.5-4.5G IF ED
Sigma 70-300 f 4-5.6 Apo Macro super II
Nikkor 50mm f1.8 AFD
CF 512+128
monopod manfrotto 679B
aprilfool
Newbie
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:51 pm
Location: Paris, FRANCE

Postby aprilfool on Mon Jan 31, 2005 9:52 pm

just a bit of correction "its not my photo" but "a photo taken by me"
Nikon D70
AF-S DX 18-70mm f3.5-4.5G IF ED
Sigma 70-300 f 4-5.6 Apo Macro super II
Nikkor 50mm f1.8 AFD
CF 512+128
monopod manfrotto 679B
aprilfool
Newbie
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:51 pm
Location: Paris, FRANCE

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:14 pm

aprilfool - a nice looking lady but IMO you are just a little too close and maybe not such a full face shot would have been better. I am sure you will show us a lot more of shots, hopefully of the same lady

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby aprilfool on Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:25 pm

here you go with an other one

Image

Can you please explain me what does IMO stands for since I am not familiar with abriviations of this forum(or either english photographic terms).
Nikon D70
AF-S DX 18-70mm f3.5-4.5G IF ED
Sigma 70-300 f 4-5.6 Apo Macro super II
Nikkor 50mm f1.8 AFD
CF 512+128
monopod manfrotto 679B
aprilfool
Newbie
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Mon Jan 31, 2005 8:51 pm
Location: Paris, FRANCE

Postby sirhc55 on Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:33 pm

IMO stands for in my opinion - in other words it may not be the opinion of others. You will see in this forum a thread where certain people will love a certain pic and others will not. That is the beauty of free speech and in particular on this forum the friendliness we try to maintain.

Now to your 2nd pic aprilfool - with any portrait shot one should try and have as few distractions from the subject as possible. I feel that the background is too much of a distraction. I would like to have seen this shot in portrait mode with the young ladies eyes not looking towards the ceiling IMO.

Don’t be put off by my critique we are only here to help

Chris
Chris
--------------------------------
I started my life with nothing and I’ve still got most of it left
User avatar
sirhc55
Key Member
 
Posts: 12930
Joined: Fri Sep 17, 2004 6:57 pm
Location: Port Macquarie - Olympus EM-10

Postby Onyx on Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:37 pm

G'day Aprilfool, looks like you're putting that 50/1.8 to good use. I tend to like the "too close" look.
User avatar
Onyx
Senior Member
 
Posts: 3631
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2004 6:51 pm
Location: westsyd.nsw.au

Postby Mj on Mon Jan 31, 2005 10:55 pm

Hi Aprilfool... I think the first pic is the best option where the background will detract from the shot (as it does in shot two). However you need to be careful with lighting in any portrait pic, closeups even more so... this one suffers a little too much reflection. Also you could play around a little in PS to flatter the skin tones a little, as the 50/1.8 can be a harsh critic.

Composition of the second shot is all wrong... the subject isn't looking at anything we can determine, away from the lens so we lose the glitter of her eyes, and the lighting is casting unflattering shadows on her rightside.
Finally, as Chris mentioned, the background detracts from the shot.

Keep at it though and you're sure to capture a gem with this subject !!!
User avatar
Mj
Senior Member
 
Posts: 1048
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2004 3:37 pm
Location: Breakfast Point, Sydney {Australia}

Postby AlistairF on Tue Feb 01, 2005 1:45 am

Hi Aprilfool, I hope you dont mind but I did a little correction. Skin tones will be natural when you correctly White Balance. Have a look in the tutorials section. I also softened the skin a little.

Image

Alistair
User avatar
AlistairF
Member
 
Posts: 148
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 1:56 pm
Location: Melbourne

Postby atencati on Tue Feb 01, 2005 4:41 am

My first impression of the close up is the background color is blah, detracting from the overall image. Maybe a change in setting, but the coposition is great. Keep it up!

ANdy
D70, 70-200VR, 18-70, 50 1.8, SB800
Blackberry PIN: 2029497E
User avatar
atencati
Member
 
Posts: 386
Joined: Thu Oct 14, 2004 2:37 pm
Location: Sacramento, California, USA -D70

Postby ajo43 on Tue Feb 01, 2005 8:40 am

I like the 'close' look of the first one. If I have to make a suggestion it is that in both your pics the lighting is not quite right.

The first one looks like you used on board flash and this makes the image a little flat.

In the second one I think you had the WB on your camera set to Auto and you took the picture indoors with incandescent light. Try taking the picture during the day with daylight coming through a window instead.

Keen to see more of your pictures... bring em on...
Regards

Jonesy
User avatar
ajo43
Member
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2004 1:55 pm
Location: Sydney

Postby Killakoala on Tue Feb 01, 2005 10:03 am

I like the composition of the first pic, although not a technically perfect photo, the subject is well presented in the framing.

The second is not a good shot but i really like the pose the young lady has. It shows she is thinking about something and i am wondering 'what?'
There is some distracting clothing item stuck in the top of the wardrobe. Be mindful of your background, however i think you shot this one 'for fun', rather than taking time to compose it. :) (Very candid)

I think you have the making of a good photographer and you should practise, practise, practise to sharpen your skills.

Thanks for showing us your pics.
Steve.
|D700| D2H | F5 | 70-200VR | 85 1.4 | 50 1.4 | 28-70 | 10.5 | 12-24 | SB800 |
Website-> http://www.stevekilburn.com
Leeds United for promotion in 2014 - Hurrah!!!
User avatar
Killakoala
Senior Member
 
Posts: 5398
Joined: Fri Aug 13, 2004 3:31 pm
Location: Southland NZ


Return to Image Reviews and Critiques